Gold closed down $4.40 to $1666.00 while silver held up pretty good rising by 4 cents to $31.43. The closing access market for our two precious metals were as follows:
gold: $1667.20
silver: $31.43
Early Friday morning, the boys showed up at their regular time bashing gold down. It then rose up to the comex opening where it was hit again. However silver held firm rising at one point to 20 cents above par. However it too fell when gold remained below par for the rest of the comex session. Both gold and silver are manipulated constantly by our bankers as the supply/demand relationship of these two precious metals are thrown out the window. Thus technical analysis on the trading patterns of gold and silver are really worthless.
In physical news, the Chinese announced that their production in 2013 is 403 tonnes of gold. They keep every oz of production. China announced this week that their importation of gold amounted to 835 tonnes.
Together, these two sums of gold have the following purpose:
1) is used by Chinese citizens for jewellery and for hoarding (as inflation is certainly present here)
2) for official reserves.
The last official reserves for China was issued in 2009 at 1054 tonnes. It is expected that another revising of its official reserves will be either late this year or next.
The annual production of gold for all nations was reported on last week. It totaled 2800 tonnes of which Russia's production was 200 tonnes and now China is 403 tonnes. Both Russia and China keep all of their gold production and thus only 2197 tonnes is available to the world for jewellry and hoarding purposes.
India has imported over 800 tonnes of gold on an annual basis but produces a very tiny 2.8 tonnes of gold.
The Indian citizens appetite for gold continues to rise unabated despite opposition from the government as they are witnessing a huge current account deficit of which the gold importation had a major effect. The government is trying to raise duties and taxes trying to quell gold's demand.
Together, China and India import 1635 tonnes of gold, leaving very little gold for the rest of the world for jewellery and hoarding. (562 tonnes).
The COT report released in gold showed a huge drop in commercial longs. Are they losing their "hedging" vehicle?
Friday night saw another 3.01 tonnes of gold leave the GLD vaults.
In paper news, the 3rd LTRO repayment only amounted to 5 million euros. We will have to wait until the end of February to see what happens when the 2nd LTRO schedule is allowed to be repaid for the first time.
Venezuela devalued its currency by a huge 46% due to a shortage of USA dollars. Inflation will run rampant in that country.
In USA news, the trade deficit narrowed to 38 billion dollars. And finally Dan Norcini points out that the USA bought this year more debt than what the treasury issued. Very strange!!
We will discuss these and many other stories but first let us head over to the comex and assess trading today............
The total comex gold open interest fell by 2628 contracts falling from 432,394 down to 420,766. The active February gold contract delivery month saw it's OI fall by 73 contracts from 2135 down to 2062. We had 0 delivery notices filed on Thursday so we lost 73 contracts or 7300 oz of gold standing for the February contract month. The non active March gold month gained 160 contracts up to 1324. The next active gold contract month (April) saw it's OI fall by 3,433 contracts from 253,813 down to 250,380. The estimated volume on Friday was poor at 93,731. The confirmed volume on Thursday was much better at 181,184.
The total silver comex OI remains at high lofty levels, coming to rest this weekend at 150,111 although it fell 1451 contracts from Thursday. The non active front February contract month saw it's OI rise by 17 up to 34 contracts. We had 4 delivery notices on Thursday, so in essence we gained 21 contracts or 105,000 oz of additional silver standing for February. We are 3 weeks away from first day notice. The active silver March contract month saw it's OI fall from 70,865 down to 66,757 for a loss of 4108 contracts. The estimated volume was fair on Friday as it came in at 40,445 contracts, compared to a huge volume on Thursday at 67,807.
Comex gold/February contract month:
Feb 8.2013
Ounces
Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory in oz
96.45 (HSBC)
Withdrawals from Customer Inventory in oz
nil
Deposits to the Dealer Inventory in oz
nil
Deposits to the Customer Inventory, in oz
3375.75 (HSBC)
No of oz served (contracts) today
0 (nil oz)
No of oz to be served (notices)
2062 (206,200) oz
Total monthly oz gold served (contracts) so far this month
10,322 (1,032,200 oz)
Total accumulative withdrawal of gold from the Dealers inventory this month
96.45
Total accumulative withdrawal of gold from the Customer inventory this month
75,941.547
We had little activity at the gold vaults.
The dealer had no deposits but did have one withdrawal.
i) out of HSBC dealer vault: 96.45 oz.
We had 1 customer deposit:
i) Into HSBC: 3375.75 oz
total deposit: 3375.75 oz
We had 0 customer withdrawal:
total withdrawal: nil oz
We had 1 big adjustments:
i) from the JPM vaults: 255,756.56 oz of gold leaves the dealer and enters the customer. This equates to 7.9 tonnes of gold. This is probably a settlement.
Thus the dealer inventory rests tonight at 2.669 million oz (83.04) tonnes of gold.
The CME reported that we had 0 notices filed for nil oz of gold today. The total number of notices so far this month is thus 10,322 contracts x 100 oz per contract or 1,032,200 oz of gold. To determine how much will stand for February, I take the OI standing for February (2062) and subtract out today's notices (0) which leaves me with 2062 notices or 206,200 oz left to be served upon our longs.
Thus the total number of gold ounces standing in this active month of February is as follows:
1,032,200 oz (served ) + 206,200 oz (to be served upon) = 1,238,400 oz or 38.51 Tonnes.
we lost 73 contracts or 7300 oz of gold.
Silver:
February 8.2013: The February silver contract month
Silver
Ounces
Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory 801,018.56 (Brinks)
Withdrawals from Customer Inventory 629,415.01 (Brinks, scotia)
Deposits to the Dealer Inventory nil
Deposits to the Customer Inventory 311,160.91
No of oz served (contracts) 0 (nil oz)
No of oz to be served (notices) 34 (170,000 oz)
Total monthly oz silver served (contracts) 76 (380,000 oz)
Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Dealers inventory this month 984,015.06
Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Customer inventory this month 1,542,444.01
Today, we had huge activity inside the silver vaults.
we had no dealer deposit and one dealer withdrawal.
i) Out of Brinks: 801,018.56 oz
We had 3 customer deposits of silver:
1) Into Delaware: 982.80 oz
ii) Into HSBC: 305,200.91
iii) Into Scotia: 4977.20
total customer deposit: 311,160.91 oz
we had 2 customer withdrawals:
i) out of Scotia: 626,412.71 oz
ii) Out of Delaware: 3002.30
total customer withdrawal: 629,415.01 oz
we had 2 adjustments:
i) a counting error where 10,327.000 is added to Brinks
ii) from CNT vault, 20,002.6 oz is removed from the customer and added to the dealer.
When you see massive deposits and withdrawals you know that there is turmoil inside the silver vaults.
Registered silver remains today at : 36.261 million oz
total of all silver: 157.3910 million oz.
The CME reported that we had 0 notices filed for nil oz of silver for the February contract month. To obtain what is left to be served upon our longs, I take the OI standing for February (34) and subtract out Friday's notices (0) which leaves us with 34 notices or 170,000 oz left to be served upon our longs.
Thus the total number of silver ounces standing for delivery in silver is as follows:
380,000 oz (served) + 170,000 oz (to be served upon) = 550,000 oz
We gained 105,000 oz of silver standing for February.
Ounces
| |
Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory in oz
|
96.45 (HSBC)
|
Withdrawals from Customer Inventory in oz
|
nil
|
Deposits to the Dealer Inventory in oz
|
nil
|
Deposits to the Customer Inventory, in oz
| 3375.75 (HSBC) |
No of oz served (contracts) today
|
0 (nil oz)
|
No of oz to be served (notices)
|
2062 (206,200) oz
|
Total monthly oz gold served (contracts) so far this month
|
10,322 (1,032,200 oz)
|
Total accumulative withdrawal of gold from the Dealers inventory this month
|
96.45
|
Total accumulative withdrawal of gold from the Customer inventory this month
| 75,941.547 |
We had little activity at the gold vaults.
The dealer had no deposits but did have one withdrawal.
i) out of HSBC dealer vault: 96.45 oz.
i) out of HSBC dealer vault: 96.45 oz.
We had 1 customer deposit:
i) Into HSBC: 3375.75 oz
total deposit: 3375.75 oz
We had 0 customer withdrawal:
total withdrawal: nil oz
i) Into HSBC: 3375.75 oz
total deposit: 3375.75 oz
We had 0 customer withdrawal:
total withdrawal: nil oz
We had 1 big adjustments:
i) from the JPM vaults: 255,756.56 oz of gold leaves the dealer and enters the customer. This equates to 7.9 tonnes of gold. This is probably a settlement.
Thus the dealer inventory rests tonight at 2.669 million oz (83.04) tonnes of gold.
The CME reported that we had 0 notices filed for nil oz of gold today. The total number of notices so far this month is thus 10,322 contracts x 100 oz per contract or 1,032,200 oz of gold. To determine how much will stand for February, I take the OI standing for February (2062) and subtract out today's notices (0) which leaves me with 2062 notices or 206,200 oz left to be served upon our longs.
Thus the total number of gold ounces standing in this active month of February is as follows:
1,032,200 oz (served ) + 206,200 oz (to be served upon) = 1,238,400 oz or 38.51 Tonnes.
we lost 73 contracts or 7300 oz of gold.
Thus the total number of gold ounces standing in this active month of February is as follows:
1,032,200 oz (served ) + 206,200 oz (to be served upon) = 1,238,400 oz or 38.51 Tonnes.
we lost 73 contracts or 7300 oz of gold.
Silver:
February 8.2013: The February silver contract month
| Silver |
Ounces
|
| Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory | 801,018.56 (Brinks) |
| Withdrawals from Customer Inventory | 629,415.01 (Brinks, scotia) |
| Deposits to the Dealer Inventory | nil |
| Deposits to the Customer Inventory | 311,160.91 |
| No of oz served (contracts) | 0 (nil oz) |
| No of oz to be served (notices) | 34 (170,000 oz) |
| Total monthly oz silver served (contracts) | 76 (380,000 oz) |
| Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Dealers inventory this month | 984,015.06 |
| Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Customer inventory this month | 1,542,444.01 |
Today, we had huge activity inside the silver vaults.
we had no dealer deposit and one dealer withdrawal.
i) Out of Brinks: 801,018.56 oz
i) Out of Brinks: 801,018.56 oz
We had 3 customer deposits of silver:
1) Into Delaware: 982.80 oz
ii) Into HSBC: 305,200.91
iii) Into Scotia: 4977.20
total customer deposit: 311,160.91 oz
we had 2 customer withdrawals:
i) out of Scotia: 626,412.71 oz
ii) Out of Delaware: 3002.30
total customer withdrawal: 629,415.01 oz
1) Into Delaware: 982.80 oz
ii) Into HSBC: 305,200.91
iii) Into Scotia: 4977.20
total customer deposit: 311,160.91 oz
we had 2 customer withdrawals:
i) out of Scotia: 626,412.71 oz
ii) Out of Delaware: 3002.30
total customer withdrawal: 629,415.01 oz
we had 2 adjustments:
i) a counting error where 10,327.000 is added to Brinks
ii) from CNT vault, 20,002.6 oz is removed from the customer and added to the dealer.
i) a counting error where 10,327.000 is added to Brinks
ii) from CNT vault, 20,002.6 oz is removed from the customer and added to the dealer.
When you see massive deposits and withdrawals you know that there is turmoil inside the silver vaults.
Registered silver remains today at : 36.261 million oz
total of all silver: 157.3910 million oz.
The CME reported that we had 0 notices filed for nil oz of silver for the February contract month. To obtain what is left to be served upon our longs, I take the OI standing for February (34) and subtract out Friday's notices (0) which leaves us with 34 notices or 170,000 oz left to be served upon our longs.
Thus the total number of silver ounces standing for delivery in silver is as follows:
380,000 oz (served) + 170,000 oz (to be served upon) = 550,000 oz
We gained 105,000 oz of silver standing for February.
Thus the total number of silver ounces standing for delivery in silver is as follows:
380,000 oz (served) + 170,000 oz (to be served upon) = 550,000 oz
We gained 105,000 oz of silver standing for February.
The two ETF's that I follow are the GLD and SLV. You must be very careful in trading these vehicles as these funds do not have any beneficial gold or silver behind them. They probably have only paper claims and when the dust settles, on a collapse, there will be countless class action lawsuits trying to recover your lost investment.
There is now evidence that the GLD and SLV are paper settling on the comex.
Total Gold in Trust: Feb 8.2013:
feb 7.2013:
Feb 6.2013:
Feb 5.2013:
Feb 4.2013:
Feb 1.2013:
Tonnes1,326.89
Ounces42,660,782.25
Value US$71.133 billion
feb 7.2013:
Tonnes1,329.90
Ounces42,757,579.81
Value US$71.284 billion
Feb 6.2013:
Tonnes1,328.09
Ounces42,699,500.65
Value US$71,455 billion
Feb 5.2013:
Tonnes1,328.09
Ounces42,699,500.65
Value US$71.424 billion.
Feb 4.2013:
Tonnes1,328.09
Ounces42,699,500.65
Value US$71.104 billion
Feb 1.2013:
Tonnes1,328.09
Ounces42,699,500.65
Value US$71.235 billion
we lost a monstrous 3.01 tonnes of gold at the GLD Friday.
and now for silver:
Feb 8:2013:
feb 6.2013:
Feb 5.2013
feb 4.2013:
we gained 822,000 oz of silver at the SLV Friday.
Feb 8:2013:
| Ounces of Silver in Trust | 335,858,876.200 |
| Tonnes of Silver in Trust | 10,446.38 |
| Ounces of Silver in Trust | 335,036,944.900 |
| Tonnes of Silver in Trust | 10,420.81 |
feb 6.2013:
| Ounces of Silver in Trust | 335,036,944.900 |
| Tonnes of Silver in Trust | 10,420.81 |
Feb 5.2013
| Ounces of Silver in Trust | 335,175,993.900 |
| Tonnes of Silver in Trust | 10,425.14 |
feb 4.2013:
| Ounces of Silver in Trust | 335,175,993.900 |
| Tonnes of Silver in Trust | 10,425.14 |
we gained 822,000 oz of silver at the SLV Friday.
end
And now for our premiums to NAV for the funds I follow:
Sprott and Central Fund of Canada.
(both of these funds have 100% physical metal behind them and unencumbered and I can vouch for that)
Sprott and Central Fund of Canada.
(both of these funds have 100% physical metal behind them and unencumbered and I can vouch for that)
(both of these funds have 100% physical metal behind them and unencumbered and I can vouch for that)
1. Central Fund of Canada: traded to a positive 3.1 percent to NAV in usa funds and a positive 3.3% to NAV for Cdn funds. ( Feb 8 2013)
1. Central Fund of Canada: traded to a positive 3.1 percent to NAV in usa funds and a positive 3.3% to NAV for Cdn funds. ( Feb 8 2013)
2. Sprott silver fund (PSLV): Premium to NAV rose to 2.50% NAV Feb 8./2013
3. Sprott gold fund (PHYS): premium to NAV fell to 2.55% positive to NAV Feb 8/ 2013..
Now we witness the Central fund of Canada gaining big time in its positive to NAV, as we now see CEF at a positive 3.1% in usa and 3.3% in Canadian.This fund is back in premiums to it's former self with respect to premiums per NAV.
The silver Sprott fund announced a big silver purchase and this reduces the premium to NAV temporarily.
It looks like England may have trouble in finding gold and silver for its clients.
It is worth watching the premium for gold at the Sprott funds which is a good indicator of shortage as investors bid up the premiums.
2. Sprott silver fund (PSLV): Premium to NAV rose to 2.50% NAV Feb 8./2013
3. Sprott gold fund (PHYS): premium to NAV fell to 2.55% positive to NAV Feb 8/ 2013..
3. Sprott gold fund (PHYS): premium to NAV fell to 2.55% positive to NAV Feb 8/ 2013..
The silver Sprott fund announced a big silver purchase and this reduces the premium to NAV temporarily.
It looks like England may have trouble in finding gold and silver for its clients.
It is worth watching the premium for gold at the Sprott funds which is a good indicator of shortage as investors bid up the premiums.
end
Friday night saw the release of the COT report where we get to see position levels of our major players. The report is always based on a Tuesday to Tuesday week.
Let us now head over to the gold COT: ( levels ending Feb 5)
Gold COT Report - Futures
| ||||||
Large Speculators
|
Commercial
|
Total
| ||||
Long
|
Short
|
Spreading
|
Long
|
Short
|
Long
|
Short
|
192,806
|
55,341
|
24,811
|
145,291
|
319,898
|
362,908
|
400,050
|
Change from Prior Reporting Period
| ||||||
11,703
|
1,186
|
-1,224
|
-14,485
|
-6,975
|
-4,006
|
-7,013
|
Traders
| ||||||
184
|
74
|
66
|
60
|
44
|
276
|
159
|
Small Speculators
| ||||||
Long
|
Short
|
Open Interest
| ||||
61,074
|
23,932
|
423,982
| ||||
-2,730
|
277
|
-6,736
| ||||
non reportable positions
|
Change from the previous reporting period
| |||||
COT Gold Report - Positions as of
|
Tuesday, February 05, 2013
| |||||
Our large speculators:
Those large speculators who are long in gold, loved the lay of the land and these guys poured it on by adding a massive 11,703 contracts to their long side.
Those large speculators who are short in gold, added 1186 contracts to their short side.
Our commercials:
Those commercials who are long in gold and are close to the physical scene, dumped a massive 14,485 contracts from their long side. Very unusual.
Those commercials who have been short in gold, covered a rather large 6975 contracts.
Our small specs:
Our small specs:
Those small specs that are long in gold, pitched 2730 contracts from their long side
Those small specs that are short in gold added a tiny 277 contracts to their short side.
Conclusion;
The commercials went net short by a rather large 7,510 contracts. This has to be construed as bearish. (However keep in mind that the commercials are engaging in collusive criminal activity.)
And now for our silver COT:
Silver COT Report: Futures
| |||||
Large Speculators
|
Commercial
| ||||
Long
|
Short
|
Spreading
|
Long
|
Short
| |
42,449
|
6,588
|
35,724
|
46,293
|
98,239
| |
-640
|
-1,697
|
2,094
|
889
|
2,568
| |
Traders
| |||||
80
|
26
|
50
|
35
|
41
| |
Small Speculators
|
Open Interest
|
Total
| |||
Long
|
Short
|
151,512
|
Long
|
Short
| |
27,046
|
10,961
|
124,466
|
140,551
| ||
637
|
15
|
2,980
|
2,343
|
2,965
| |
non reportable positions
|
Positions as of:
|
138
|
101
| ||
Tuesday, February 05, 2013
|
© SilverSeek.com
| ||||
Please note the difference between the gold COT report and the silver COT:
Those large speculators that are long in silver, pitched a tiny 640 contracts from their long side
Those large speculators that are short in silver, covered 1697 contracts from their short side.
Our commercials;
Those commercials that are long in silver and are close to the physical scene added (in total contrast to gold) 889 contracts to their long side.
Those commercials that are short in silver, added a huge 2568 contracts from their short side as nobody else could supply the paper.
Small specs:
Those small specs that have been long in silver added 637 contracts to their short side.
Those small specs that have been short in silver added a tiny 15 contracts to their short side.
Conclusion;
The bankers were trying to convince some of the speculators to go short and this was to no avail. The only guys supplying the short paper are the commercials and on Friday they went net short another 1679 contracts. They did this with silver price on the low side. However because of the added net short position of the bankers in silver we must say that a bearish tone is still present.
end
And now for the major physical stories we faced today:
First gold trading from Europe and Asia courtesy of Goldcore.
1. Gold in euros surges 1.8%. This is closely watched by European traders.
2. Soros thinks that we may have an EU collapse just like we witnessed in the uSSR
3. Chinese production soars again and now has surpassed 400 tonnes at 403 tonnes per year.
The Chinese keep every single oz of production. China has already reported an increase of imports of gold into China at 835 tonnes. Thus production and importation of gold in China comes to 1238 tonnes of gold. The world produces on an annual basis 2197 tonnes of gold (ex China ex Russia which keeps all production).
4. Goldcore asks the question as to why the silver manipulation probe has not been resolved in the same manner as the libor scandal with the huge fines to our bankers. They are asking are the banks making huge profits by manipulating silver (and of course gold)?
(courtesy goldcore)
-- Posted Friday, 8 February 2013 | | Source: GoldSeek.com
Today’s AM fix was USD 1,669.75, EUR 1,245.15 and GBP 1,059.55 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,675.75, EUR 1,235.99 and GBP 1,065.86 per ounce. ![]()
Cross Currency and Precious Metal Table – (Bloomberg)
While gold fell in dollar terms yesterday, it surged 1.8% in euro terms from €1,235/oz, soon after the ECB interest rate decision, to €1,258/oz soon after. Some of the gains were quickly given up as determined selling was again seen but gold in euros closed nearly 1% higher on the day.
![]()
Gold in EUR, 10 Day - (Bloomberg)
The price gains came as Draghi warned about slowing economic growth and complacency regarding declaring an end to the financial crisis. He also warned that the euro dollar exchange rates rise could derail the recovery in Europe and signaled that an interest rate cut may even be necessary. Continuing ultra loose monetary policies in the Eurozone will support gold and should lead to higher prices in 2013. In dollar terms, gold fell $5.70 or 0.34% yesterday closing at $1,671.80/oz. Silver slid to a low of $31.28 and finished with a loss of 1.16%. ![]()
Gold in USD, 10 Day - (Bloomberg)
Gold is flat in most currencies today despite concerns over the health of the eurozone economy but gold is on course for a second week of gains which would be bullish from a technical perspective. Trading action was again peculiar yesterday with determined sellers capping the price at certain levels. There is a distinct feel that influential players are getting long and into position for the long awaited upward price move.
China's gold production increased for a sixth year in a row and hit a record 403 tonnes in 2012, keeping its ranking as the world's largest bullion producer, reported the Shanghai Securities News.
Silver continues to see determined selling at the $32/oz level.
On Wednesday, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) fined Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) $612 million for fixing the Libor interest rate. Given the significant delay in concluding the CFTC’s investigations of price manipulation in the silver market, many investors continue to ask the question as to whether certain banks are manipulating and capping the silver price thereby pocketing millions in profits at the expense of traders and investors. Bart Chilton, commissioner at the CFTC, said as long ago as October 2010 that “members of the public “and” publicly available documents convinced him the silver markets are tainted by violations of federal commodities law.
"I do believe that there have been repeated attempts to influence prices in the silver markets," Mr Chilton said. "There have been fraudulent efforts to persuade and what I consider deviously control the price."
The Financial Times recently acknowledged the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee’s (GATA) important contribution regarding establishing transparency in the gold market. GATA has also called for transparency in the silver market and it is not before time that the CFTC fulfills their duty and announces the findings of their investigations into whether Wall Street banks have been manipulating the silver market.
Manipulation or not, silver buyers will again be rewarded if they remain patient and fade out the considerable noise that emanates from the silver market.
![]()
Gold in GBP, 10 Day - (Bloomberg)The EU may suffer the fate of the USSR and “collapse” according to billionaire investor George Soros.
Soros said that incorrect economic and monetary policies and the monetary union itself may lead to currency wars and the collapse of the European Union. In saving the euro, the continent’s financial powers have damaged the economy of the euro zone and created dangerous new political imbalances. As a result, “we have quite a turbulent time ahead for 2013.”
“I am rather concerned that the euro is in danger of destroying the European Union”. There is a real threat when the possible resolution of financial difficulties of eurozone might cause a political issue,” Soros told Dutch TV in an interview.
The attempts of the European leadership to keep the common European currency are leading to the escalation of political and social issues in the EU which may eventually destroy it.
Recent SEC filings show that Soros’ hedge fund had again increased allocations to gold. NEWS Gold heads for 2nd weekly rise, PGMs off 17-month peak - Reuters Gold Sideways in Asia as Outlook Unclear; Precious Metals Lower – The Wall Street Journal Gold Volatility Squeeze Means Rise to $1,900: Technical Analysis - Bloomberg 250 tonnes of gold smuggled into India in 2012: Jewellery body – Business Standard COMMENTARYCME Cuts Gold, Silver Margins – Zero Hedge Mark Mobius Bullish On Commodities - Gold, Platinum and Palladium – Business Insider Protect your wealth as the Bank of England goes for broke – Money Morning The US Monetary Base and Gold! - GoldSeek GOLDCORE Ireland: 14 Fitzwilliam Square Dublin United Kingdom: No. 1 Cornhill EC3V 3ND UK |
end
Dr Lewis advises us to watch for premiums on silver bullion coins and this will be the ultimate
price indicator as the paper silver price deviates from the physical silver price:
(courtesy Dr Jeffry Lewis)
Dr Lewis advises us to watch for premiums on silver bullion coins and this will be the ultimate
price indicator as the paper silver price deviates from the physical silver price:
(courtesy Dr Jeffry Lewis)
The local silver coin dealer may prove to be the ultimate silver price indicator.
The lower the managed paper price of silver, the more physical metal is reduced due to increased demand. Furthermore, the higher the demand for silver, the higher the physical premium moves.
This is typically the case in true price discovery, but who really wins in this unprecedented dichotomy— the buyer, the seller, or the dealer?
Higher physical prices tend to beget renewed speculative interest, and yet higher miner valuation is limited because of higher input costs.
The Silver Mining Sector and Government Finance
No one can know where or when the next bubble will form, but one looks already close to bursting in government finance, so it seems almost inevitable that commodity prices will rise significantly in the near and medium term as more and more stimulus is needed to fuel this giant Ponzi.
Scrap silver flows will likely continue to flow back into industry, where it is needed more and more as the developed world continues to play catch up. At the same time, consumer income and growth, fueled by the government-sanctioned build up in credit and mortgage finance will compete with that demand.
Furthermore, the current financial era allows the U.S. central bank to set benchmark interest rates at artificially low levels, while monetizing trillions of Federal and mortgage-related debt. Also, the vast majority of government spending actually
This policy induced spending feeds through directly to greater income and spending levels throughout the economy, leading to higher prices.
While demand will be there, because of higher input costs, it therefore appears less likely that new exploration, new mines or an overall rehab of the silver mining sector will occur anytime soon. Remember that at least two thirds of physical silver is mined as a byproduct of other mining activities.
A Governor on Demand
Paradoxically, marginal physical demand from new silver buyers may be quelled somewhat in this situation. This state of affairs could even have the effect of fueling more investment demand toward silver derivatives that will only further distort the pricing relationship between paper and physical silver assets.
The last frontier would be a replay of the troubling double digit inflation of the 1970’s leading up to the fabled "Hunt Brothers induced" blow off top in 1980. The difference being that the seventies was a time when ‘everyone’ knew about inflation and where inflation was high enough to curb profits from investing in equities.
Price Discovery, Coin Dealing, And the Return to Sound Money
The irony here is that the return of true physical price discovery where silver prices are forced to align with or be expressed by real supply and demand factors could be the ultimate signal of a U.S. Dollar confidence failure, especially if the premium moves visibly and with velocity.
As U.S. investors increasingly lose confidence in their country’s paper currency, this situation marks the time when the local silver coin dealer breaks through to the modern age.
Coin dealers, like farmers to a certain extent seem to have become a dying, if not significantly aging breed. The growth in competition from Internet coin dealers has made it difficult to be profitable as a local coin dealer.
There simply is not much margin in bullion coins or for the customer looking to get the most from their metal. This may well change when true price discovery returns to the silver market.
end
Adrian Ash from England gives his perspective on events this week:
(courtesy Adrian Ash /Bullion vault)
by Adrian Ash
Adrian Ash from England gives his perspective on events this week:
(courtesy Adrian Ash /Bullion vault)
by Adrian Ash
Bullion vault
end
Where money was tight, suddenly it's all arrived at once. Just like trouble does...
EVERYWHERE we look, investors suddenly see nothing but blue skies, plain sailing ahead. Their change of heart makes us nervous.
New York's S&P index is back where it stood in July 2007 – right before the global credit crunch first bit, eating more than half the stock market's value inside 2 years...
Japan's Nikkei index has jumped by one third since mid-Nov., thanks to export companies getting a 20% drop in the Yen – the currency's fastest drop since right before the Asian Crisis of 1997...
And here in the UK – where the FTSE-100 stock index just enjoyed its strongest January since 1989, when house prices then suffered their biggest post-war drop – average house prices are rising year-on-year, even as the economy shrinks...
The common factor? Zero interest rates and money creation on a scale never tried outside Weimar Germany or Mugabe's Zimbabwe. Only the Eurozone has stood aside so far, and even then only a little. And yet gold and silver – the most sensitive assets to money inflation – are worse than becalmed.
Daily swings in the silver price haven't been this small since spring 2007. Volatility in the gold price has only been lower than Thursday this week on 15 days since the doldrums of mid-2005. Back then the Dollar also steadied and rose after multi-year falls. Industrial commodities outperfomed 'safe haven' gold too – a pattern echoed here in early 2013 by the surge in the price of useful platinum over industrially 'useless' gold. Perhaps the flat-lining points to better times ahead. Gold after all is where retained capital hides when things are bad – a store of value to weather the storm. Or it may signal itchy feet in the 'hot money' crowd, now moving back into stocks and shares instead. But we can't shake the feeling that something awful is afoot. Gold and silver aren't making headlines today. Just like they didn't before the financial crisis began. "Japan is on an unsustainable path of a strong Yen and deflation," wrote Andy Xie – once of Morgan Stanley, now director of Rosetta Stone Advisors – back in March 2012. "The unprofitability of Japan's major exporters and emerging trade deficits suggest that the end of this path is in sight. The transition from a strong to weak Yen will likely be abrupt, involving a sudden and big devaluation of 30 to 40 percent." Already since the Abe-nomic revolution announced in November the Yen has dropped more than 20% versus the Dollar. But "there is plenty of liquidity still parked in the Yen," Xie noted this week. Quite apart from the shock toAmerica's trade deficit which surging shale-oil supplies deliver, "The Dollar bull is due less to the United States' strengths than the weaknesses in other major economies," he adds. And reviewing the last two major counter-trend rallies in the Dollar's otherwise permanent decline, "The first dollar bull market in the 1980s triggered the Latin American debt crisis, the second the Asian Financial Crisis. Neither was a coincidence." Neither of those crises coincided with a bull market in gold or silver. Savers worldwide chose Dollars instead as the hottest emerging-market investments collapsed. But then neither of those slumps saw emerging-market central banks so stuffed with money, nor gold and silver so freely available to their citizens. China's gold imports almost doubled last year, with net demand overtaking India for the world's #1 spot at last. This week the People's Bank of China pumped a record CNY860bn into the money markets ($140bn), crashing Shanghai's interbank interest rates by almost the whole one-percent point they had earlier spiked ahead of the coming New Year's long holidays. The disparity, meantime, between the doldrums in precious metals and the bull market in Dollar-Yen trading can be seen by glancing at the US derivatives market. Yesterday the CME Group cut margin requirements on gold and silver futures. It raised the margin payments needed to play the Yen's lightening drop. One of those moves is likely bullish, short-term. But you'd to borrow money to choose. Western pension funds are meanwhile pulling out of commodities, and just as liquidity floods back into the market. Both the Wall Street Journal and theFinancial Times report how big institutions have quite hard assets "after finding they did little to protect their portfolios against inflation risk and the unpredictable returns of stocks." One of the biggest commodity hedge funds, Clive Capital has shrunk from $5 billion under management two years ago to less than $2bn today. And yet European banks – the major source of credit to commodities traders – are now reviving their commodities lending. "The sector came close to panic 18 months ago," says the FT. But now "The banks want to be again my best friend," says a Swiss executive. "Funding concerns have now substantially dissipated," says SocGen's head of natural resources and energy finance, Federico Turegano. There's plenty of money around to borrow, in short. Whether in Chinese banking, currency betting or commodities trading, where there was very little at all, suddenly it's all turned up at once. Which is just how trouble arrives. All that central-bank liquidity and quantitative easing has so far left consumer-price inflation unmoved, too.
Adrian Ash
Adrian Ash is head of research at BullionVault – the secure, low-cost gold and silver market for private investors online, where you can buy gold and silver vaulted in Zurich on just 0.5% dealing fees.
(c) BullionVault 2013
|
And now for your important paper stories which will certainly have an influence on gold and silver.
First, overnight sentiment
Important points:
1 Chinese growth at 25% for the year but had 5 more days in the calender year. If you believe their figures exports came in at 12.5% but imports only 3.4%
2. The yen soared over night (trading at 8 am at 92.441 yen per dollar) as Japanese official Aso stated the yen has depreciated too much
3. the big news, only 5 billion euros were repaid from the LTRO (estimated repayment being 7 billion euros)
4, Early Spanish, Italian bond yields and other data
5. Deutsche banks provides the details
(courtesy zero hedge/Deutsche Bank)
1 Chinese growth at 25% for the year but had 5 more days in the calender year. If you believe their figures exports came in at 12.5% but imports only 3.4%
2. The yen soared over night (trading at 8 am at 92.441 yen per dollar) as Japanese official Aso stated the yen has depreciated too much
3. the big news, only 5 billion euros were repaid from the LTRO (estimated repayment being 7 billion euros)
4, Early Spanish, Italian bond yields and other data
5. Deutsche banks provides the details
(courtesy zero hedge/Deutsche Bank)
Sentiment Muted As Northeast Braces For "Historic" Blizzard
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/08/2013 07:15 -0500
- Bank of England
- BOE
- Bond
- China
- European Central Bank
- headlines
- High Yield
- Initial Jobless Claims
- Japan
- Jim Reid
- LTRO
- Monetary Policy
- Nikkei
- Price Action
- Reuters
- SocGen
- United Kingdom
- Yen
It was a busy session for Chinese "data" (more on the laughable validity of Chinese economic releases shortly), after China released January export and import data, which rose 25% and 28.8% from a year ago respectively. Futures were delighted by the data, until someone pointed out that January 2013 had some five more working days than 2012 due to the calendar shift of the Chinese new year, and that adjusted for this effect exports were a far more modest 12.5% while imports rose only 3.4%. Credit growth in January also rose to a record, with aggregate financing of 2.54 trillion, including new local-currency loans of 1.07 trillion, exceeding forecasts, as China dumped gobs of money into the economy, while somehow quite mysteriously inflation came right on top of the expected 2.0%. The Yen soared overnight following comments from Taro Aso who said that the Yen had depreciated too fast. Heading to Europe, the biggest news so far was the latest ECB LTRO repayment which saw some 21 banks repay €4.992 billion, less than the estimated €7.0 billion, and far less than the first announcement repayment of €137 billion.
Contrary to Draghi's promises that as a result of LTRO repayments, excess liquidity is still abundant, the excess cash in the Eurosystem is now in line with the market operation reduction, and any incremental balance sheet tightening as a result of LTRO shrinkage is priced in by now, and is offset by Draghi's inflation-cautionary words from yesterday.
Perhaps the key development that Europe is waking up to is that the upcoming Italian vote will likely be inconclusive and the risk of a second ballot is rapidly growing as Berlusconi cuts Bersani's lead (more on that shortly as well).
Finally, trading today will be slower than usual as Nemo is finally found in the shape of some 12 inches of snow blanketing the Northeast.
A quick recap of European key markets as US traders trickle in on this Nemo-shortened day:
MARKETS
- Spanish 10Y yield down 11bps to 5.31%
- Italian 10Y yield down 5bps to 4.53%
- U.K. 10Y yield down 1bp to 2.1%
- German 10Y yield little changed at 1.61%
- Bund future up 0.04% to 142.87
- BTP future up 0.28% to 110.92
- EUR/USD up 0.1% to $1.3412
- Dollar Index down 0.25% to 79.99
- Sterling spot up 0.32% to $1.5766
- 1Y euro cross currency basis swap little changed at -21bps
- Stoxx 600 up 0.64% to 285.69
Key events on the calendar today as summarized by SocGen:
The EUR was offered across the board yesterday as ECB president Draghi conveyed his latest views on the economy and bank liquidity. In so far as the message on the exchange rate went, Draghi never tried to deliberately stop the currency's ascent, but the assertion that the currency appreciation could alter the inflation outlook was enough to send bulls scrambling. In practice, the ECB will now mull over its inflation forecast and any changes that the appreciation may have caused will be communicated in March. That does not necessarily make the EUR a sell in the short-run, but the resistance above 1.3500 in EUR/USD, after yesterday, will have become more congested. Note the rally too in euribor and bunds and a corresponding fall in yields and narrowing in yield differentials as the EBC reasserted its commitment to tenders with full allotment. The ECB stated that excess liquidity will stay over EUR200bn after the2nd LTRO payment later this month, which caused yield differentials to compress and EUR/G10 to deflate. Unless we observe a sudden worsening in incoming macro data over the coming weeks, there should still be enough pockets of support for the EUR to stop the corrective price action from morphing into a deeper pullback. Technically, a weekly close below 1.3375 would initiate a deeper move towards 1.3250. Watch euribor futures for price leadership.
A fairly busy calendar today will see the ECB announce the weekly LTRO repayment amounts. A potentially big day for the CAD lies ahead as employment data for January are published. For the EUR/CAD, a strong jobs report would squeeze down towards 1.3200 with a return to 1.30 not an unrealistic short-term target.
Finally, the full recap of overnight events comes from DB's Jim Reid:
It was a busy day for policy makers across the globe with Draghi and Carney – as well as the Fed and the BoJ – making headlines over the last 24 hours.
Starting with Draghi whose overall message at the post-ECB press conference seemed to be that monetary policy will remain accommodative. Like last month, Draghi talked about the remaining market fragility and reiterated that credit is yet to flow to the real economy. The ECB President didn’t appear too concerned about LTRO payments, but his comments that the euro’s strength was creating downside risk to inflation and an implicit downside risk to growth was taken to be “dovish” enough to send EURUSD down 0.92%.
Interestingly, Draghi mentioned that the ECB had “taken note” of the Irish government’s proposal to liquidate the Irish Bank Resolution Corporation and swap promissory notes for longer-term Irish government bonds. The move was seen by some as a form of monetary financing, but Draghi stopped short of offering an opinion, commenting instead that “this is not the last word on Ireland”.
In the UK, BoE governor-elect Mark Carney played down suggestions that he would rapidly press for changes in the monetary policy framework at the BoE. Regarding the inflation-targeting regime, he said that the “bar for alteration is very high” but he did hint at a potential change in the BoE’s communication policy to something more akin to that of the Fed.
Turning to the Fed, Board governor Jeremy Stein made an interesting speech warning on potential overheating in some parts of the credit market including high yield bonds and mortgages. Stein made a number of observations including the fact that the annualised pace of pay-in-kind bond issuance in the fourth quarter of 2012 was comparable to the highs from 2007. Stein also mentioned that the past year had set a new record in the use of loans for dividend recapitalizations.
In Japan, the PM’s push for a new governor to lead a policy shake-up at the BoJ has run into resistance from his own cabinet, according to Reuters. The report suggests that members of Abe’s government prefer former deputy BoJ governor Toshiro Muto, who advocates more asset purchases but has also warned that excessive financing of public debt could backfire through a rise in bond yields. Meanwhile, PM Abe prefers Asian Development Bank President Haruhiko Huroda who has been a sharp critic of the outgoing BoJ governor’s policies (Reuters). The article cites a source close to Abe as saying that the final choice of BoJ governor “will be a close call with a lot of complexities involved”.
Returning to the markets, it was a rather mixed day for European equities which saw a small bounce as Draghi spoke. The Stoxx600 (-0.22%) was unable to hold into gains however, with a weak tone in US equities (S&P500 -0.2%) weighing on the European close.
Italian stocks underperformed again (MIB -1.22%) as one of the final updates before the polling blackout is due to kick in on Saturday showed that Berlusconi had pulled to within 3.6% of the pro-reform centre-left (vs a 3.7% gap on Wednesday). The ECB and BoE remained on hold as widely expected. Datawise it was a relatively quiet day. German industrial production rose 0.3% in December (vs +0.1% expected). In the US, initial jobless claims fell 5k to 366k, leaving our US economists calling for a 180k rise in non-farm payrolls this month.
Turning briefly to the overnight session where the focus has been on Chinese and Japanese trade reports. Starting with the Chinese data, December exports grew 25.0%yoy (vs 17.5% expected). Import growth also surprised to the upside (28.8% vs 23.5%) as the trade surplus grew to $29.15bn (vs $24.7bn expected). In Japan, the December current account deteriorated to JPY264bn (vs JPY144bn expected) with Bloomberg reporting that this is the first consecutive monthly current account deficit since 1981. In terms of markets, Asian equities are enjoying solid gains ahead of the Lunar New Year break with the Hang Seng, KOSPI and Shanghai Composite up 0.3%, 0.8% and 0.8% respectively, helped by the stronger Chinese trade data. The Nikkei (-1.5%) is the notable underperformer overnight weighed by the abovementioned BoJ headlines and with USDJPY 0.30% lower overnight (93.35).
Looking at the day’s data docket, the highlights include German and US trade reports. The EU leader’s summit will continue today with a goal of agreeing a medium-term budget.
end
Great commentary on whether Japan's need to reflate, will bring on a full fledged currency war:
(courtesy zero hedge)
Great commentary on whether Japan's need to reflate, will bring on a full fledged currency war:
(courtesy zero hedge)
Will Japan's "Attempted" Reflation Succeed And Will It Spill Over Into Full-Fledged Currency War?
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/07/2013 21:36 -0500
- Bank of Japan
- Bond
- Central Banks
- China
- ETC
- Fail
- Federal Reserve
- Global Economy
- Goldman Sachs
- goldman sachs
- Gross Domestic Product
- Japan
- Monetary Policy
- Nominal GDP
- Real Interest Rates
- REITs
- Sovereign Debt
- Swiss Franc
- Swiss National Bank
- Trade Balance
- Yen
Yesterday we presented a simplistic analysis of why for Japan "This Time Won't Be Different", a preliminary observation so far validated by the just announced Japanese December current account deficit which was not only nearly double the expected 144.2 billion yen, printing at some 264.1 billion yen, but was only the first back-to-back monthly current account deficit since 1985.
In short - at least in the first month of Abe's great reflation attempt, not only did trade post another whopper of a deficit, but so did the broader current account implying that much more Yen weakness will be needed to generate the structural reforms sought by the new Prime Minister.
But perhaps we are wrong and this time Abe will succeed where he, and so many others, have failed before. And, as is now widely understood, perhaps Japan will succeed in finally launching the necessary and sufficient currency war that would be part and parcel of Japans great reflation, as even various G-8 members have recently acknowledged.
The question is will it, and when?
One attempt at an answer comes from the fine folks at Bienville Capital who have compiled the definitive pros and cons presentation on what Japan must do, and how it will play out, at least if all goes according to plan.
What not even this presentation addresses is what happens if Japan is, in the end, successful in reflating, in the process beggaring all its neighbors, radically shifting the economic lay of the globe, and launching full blown currency war - far worse than anything seen to date, including the dark days of the 1930s.
Below are the highlights:
- Monetary policy in Japan is undergoing a monumental change. For the first time in Japan’s post-bubble era beginning in 1990, it appears policymakers intend to drive real interest rates into negative territory. As a result, we believe the yen could continue to weaken and that Japanese equities could be in the early stages of a powerful rally
- On October 30, 2012 the Bank of Japan and Ministry of Finance issued a joint statement entitled “Measures Aimed at Overcoming Deflation,” setting the stage for “powerful easing,” including what seems to be an explicit attempt to weaken the yen. On December 16th, 2012, Shinzo Abe was elected Prime Minister with a mandate to end deflation (i.e. to reflate the Japanese economy)
- Although Japan has struggled with a deflating economy for nearly two decades, the timing of these actions is not random. For a variety of idiosyncratic, macro and geopolitical reasons, the Japanese economy is faltering. Partly as a result of a strong yen, industrial production and business surveys have deteriorated, and the revenues of several national export champions have collapsed
- Due to negligible growth and deflation, the level of nominal GDP in Japan remains well below previous highs (Slide 4), a dangerous circumstance for an economy carrying the world’s largest sovereign debt burden. As history has proven, debt and deflation cannot coexist
- In return for failing to reflate the Japanese economy, the Bank of Japan is on the verge of losing its independence. At the behest of Abe, it seems likely the BOJ will confirm a new 2.0% inflation target on January 22nd. In April 2013, the BOJ’s ‘hawkish’ Governor, Masaaki Shirakawa, is set to retire, likely to be replaced with a far more ‘dovish’ candidate (Slide 5)
- In implementing monetary policy, the Bank of Japan is authorized to buy domestic and foreign assets, including equities and REITs (Slide 6). Achieving the 2% inflation target will prove difficult as domestic deflationary pressures remain. Wages, specifically, are contracting (Slide 7). Hence policy will need to be highly aggressive
- In recent years, although the BOJ has expanded its balance sheet (Slide 8), it has risen far less than other central banks since the financial crisis began (Slide 9)
- Regardless of whether the BOJ proves successful in achieving their inflation target, the expectation of aggressive policy can have a meaningful impact on the yen and Japanese equities, which remain at low levels compared to previous highs (Slide 10 & 11). Recently, equities have rallied and the yen has begun to weaken (Slide 12). But on a “real, trade-weighted basis,” the yen could fall another 20% before reaching the levels of 2007
- To be clear, the intention of the additional policy measures in Japan is to enlist the “portfolio balance channel”—that is, to drive “real” interest rates negative, forcing Japanese savers out of cash and bonds and into riskier assets (i.e. equities). The Federal Reserve has attempted this process twice recently: in 2003 and 2009 (Slide 13), both of which resulted in higher asset prices. By contrast, real interest rates in Japan have remained positive, benefitting bondholders (Slide 14). High real rates also encourages saving over consumption
- The 2003-2005 analog in Japan is interesting: monetary policy was aggressive, the BOJ’s balance sheet expanded by 25%, the yen weakened by 15% and Japanese equities rallied 125%. Of course this occurred during a period of global easing and reflation. In order to achieve today’s stated goals, the BOJ will need to be far more aggressive. For instance, in order to peg and maintain the Swiss Franc to the Euro at 1.20, the Swiss National Bank has expanded its balance sheet by 100% since August 2011
- We believe the primary risk to this theme is lack of policy follow-through—that is, policymakers fail to act to the degree they are currently suggesting, as has occurred in the past. We currently believe this risk is minimal given the determined and coordinated communications from policymakers, as well as key upcoming events (e.g. Upper House elections, etc.). However, lack of policy follow-through would invalidate the theme
- However, on a valuation basis, Japanese equities are relatively cheap (1.2x Price/Book versus 1.5x for other global indices) and yield 2.7%, more than 3x the yield from Japanese government bonds
- International mutual funds are also currently underweight Japanese equities. Goldman Sachs believes international mutual funds’ allocation to Japan is 4% below benchmark (MSCI EAFE). If portfolio managers feel pressure to “get to benchmark, ” some $60 billion could flow into Japanese equities (in addition to the estimated $20 billion of recent inflows
- Japan’s debt-to-GDP ratio is above 200%. Therefore, higher interest rates in Japan could be highly destabilizing. Today policymakers are undergoing a delicate balancing act: attempting to increase inflation and inflation expectations so that investors reallocate savings to riskier assets without causing nominal bond yields to rise. We are unsure of whether they can achieve this and continue to expect significant stress in the JGB market at some point. However, at the moment our focus has been to attempt to profit from a weakening yen and rising Japanese equities
- To be sure, these events have significant implications for the global economy. To weaken the yen, the BOJ needs to buy foreign assets, and given the size of the purchases required, the likely candidates would be US Dollar and Euro-denominated assets. Neither the US, nor Europe prefer to see a meaningful appreciation of their currencies
- A materially weaker yen also complicates the necessary global rebalancing process: the US and parts of Europe—i.e. current account deficit countries—need to move towards trade balance to achieve sustainable growth (i.e. a weaker USD and euro relative to some peers). By contrast, the surplus countries, notably China, Japan and Germany—the world’s 2nd, 3rd, and 4th largest economies—need to engineer more domestic demand, relying less on exports, or external demand, for growth. A policy-induced shift back towards export-led growth by the surplus countries would only rekindle the global imbalances that erupted in 2008
- Having virtually exhausted its ability to grow through investment, China is unlikely to sit idle as Japan weakens the yen, stealing external demand in the process
- Recently, the yen has weakened by nearly 20% versus the Korean won, one of Japan’s primary competitors, threatening Korean exports, which represent 50% of its economy
- In sum, aggressive actions by the BOJ could escalate into a full-fledged currency war. Investors should be monitoring these events closely
Full presentation: see zero hedge for full presentation.
end
A summary of the tiny LTRO repayment and thus tiny liquidity tightening as the balance sheet of the ECB contracts. However on the 28th of February, the second LTRO begins its repayment and expect some of the core countries to repay.
(courtesy zero hedge)
end
A summary of the tiny LTRO repayment and thus tiny liquidity tightening as the balance sheet of the ECB contracts. However on the 28th of February, the second LTRO begins its repayment and expect some of the core countries to repay.
(courtesy zero hedge)
Third LTRO Put-Back Post-Mortem: €5 Billion Down, €873 Billion To Go
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/08/2013 08:01 -0500
As reported previously, today was the third weekly LTRO putback option for European banks. At just €5 billion it was a far cry from the first week's €137 billion whopper, which as we explained, marked the peak level for the Euro, as it is all liquidity tightening from here (especially once the obligatory dose of bank stigma is thrown in) at least until Draghi shifts from unlimited off-balance sheet guarantees to very limited on-balance sheet expansion once more, a move that will see the EUR plunge. But we'll cross that bridge when we get to it. For now - here is Goldman with a summary post-mortem of what has happened so far in LTROville.
LTRO put-back: Week 3: €5 bn (cumulative repayment €146 bn; €873 bn outstanding)
€5 bn in the third put-back, €873 bn left
Today (February 8) at 11:00 GMT, the ECB announced the LTRO funds returned to it through the (third) weekly put-back option. Banks repaid €5 bn, bringing the cumulative repayment to €146 bn or 14% of the initial take-up. The cumulative amount of LTRO cash left in the system now stands at €873 bn.
Weekly put-back tempo of <€5 bn base case
Banks used the initial repayment option to send a "health signal" and repaid €137 bn. Over the past two weeks, the repayment tempo has stabilised, and we see a “repayment corridor” of €0-5 bn per week as a base case expectation.
End February: Next large put-back?
Banks have the option to begin putting back LTRO-2 funds allocation on February 28. We see this as the date of a larger put-back amount, as the banks in the core – which have opted for full repayment of LTRO-1 – get the opportunity to repay the LTRO funds in full.
Signaling and maturity are crucial
Without time pressure, a put-back decision is driven by economics. We believe that for peripheral banks LTRO money continues to offer an attractive reinvestment proposition.
Moreover, we believe the banks will use 4Q2012 results to outline a longer term path of repayments, in order to signal their ‘resilience’.
Finally, with two years remaining, LTRO remains an attractive facility for the majority of banks, which cannot achieve comparable terms in the funding market. But in a year’s time, this is unlikely to be the case. We believe a longer term exit path will be the most likely outcome.
Top bank picks: Growth and self-help
Within the Eurozone, we have a long-standing preference for BBVA and Erste, to which we have recently added BNP and UCG. These banks offer growth options (BBVA, Erste) with restructuring potential (UCG), while they all share attractive valuation levels. Outside of the Eurozone, our preference is for UBS and HSBC.
end
Nigel Farage discusses that the European Union is on "troll patrol"
Our favourite politician from the UK
(courtesy zero hedge)
Nigel Farage discusses that the European Union is on "troll patrol"
Our favourite politician from the UK
(courtesy zero hedge)
Farage Demolishes Europe's "Troll Patrol"
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/08/2013 13:34 -0500
Whether it is Euro-Skeptic MEPs, tin-foil-hat-wearing bloggers, anarchic facebook-friends, or 'V-for-Vendetta'-atavar'd twitterati, the European Union is now engaging in a social media blast to "correct their misconceptions". In what appears to be a coordinated troll-patrol, Nigel Farage notes the "very very scared" leaders of the European Union are spending taxpayers money to counter growing skepticism at the unelected leaders dragging citizens into a United States of Europe. The outspoken British MEP makes it very clear he thinks this social media smear campaign is leading towards a 'mugabe-like' banana republic, as Europe's leaders, who he believes are the "most dangerous people in Europe in 70 years," are terrified at the citizenry's realization that none of this removal of sovereignty was ever voted for. Banana Republic indeed...
Venezuela devalues currency by 32%
Submitted by cpowell on Fri, 2013-02-08 21:43. Section: Daily Dispatches
By Eyanir Chinea
Reuters
Friday, February 8, 2013
Reuters
Friday, February 8, 2013
CARACAS -- Venezuela devalued its bolivar currency to 6.3 per dollar from 4.3 per dollar, the finance minister said today, in a widely expected move to shore up government finances after blowout government spending last year.
The measure will help ease a shortage of dollars that has crimped imports and left many supermarkets barren of staples such as flour or sugar. It is also seen pushing up consumer prices in the import-dependent OPEC nation that already has one of Latin America's highest inflation rates.
Venezuela has maintained exchange controls on the bolivar for a decade under which importers and travelers must seek dollars through a state currency board, or buy them on an illegal black market where greenbacks fetch nearly four times the official rate.
Central Bank President Nelson Merentes said on Friday the government was also eliminating a currency exchange system known as SITME, which functioned via bond swaps in parallel with the state currency control board.
The currency adjustment follows two months of silence from socialist President Hugo Chavez, who is in Havana and has not been seen in two months since a complex cancer surgery.
The inflationary impact over the coming months could dent Chavez's popularity at a time of ongoing uncertainty over whether his cancer will prevent him completing a third term in office.
The central bank said on Friday that consumer prices rose 3.3 percent in January, the country's second-highest rate since 2010, while product shortages reached their highest in close to five years.
end
And on the same topic:
( courtesyMathew Boesler/Businessinsider)
Venezuela just undertook a massive currency devaluation, re-pegging the bolivar to a value of 6.3 per U.S. dollar from its previous official exchange rate of 4.3 bolivars per dollar.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/venezuela-bolivar-currency-devaluation-2013-2#ixzz2KN5QkVYQ
And on the same topic:
( courtesyMathew Boesler/Businessinsider)
Venezuela Devalues Its Currency
The government also announced that it would shutter the Venezuelan currency exchange system known as SITME.
Given the currency devaluation underway in other economies around the world right now – perhaps most notably in Japan – a few are calling this Venezuela's foray into the global "currency war" between countries trying to devalue their currencies in order to increase export competitiveness.
However, Venezuela appears to be having a different sort of problem. The country is experiencing a shortage of U.S. dollars, which is making it hard for the country to pay for imports.
Bloomberg's Corina Pons & Nathan Crooks reported on Monday:
The government isn’t considering a devaluation at the moment given its strong balance of payments, the official said. The goal is to improve the supply of dollars while keeping in place existing currency controls, said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because no final decision has been made.
Last week the government took its first step to increase the supply of dollars in the economy by channeling more of its oil exports revenue to the central bank. South America’s biggest oil producer is facing shortages of goods ranging from diapers to cars as the lack of dollars crimps imports. In the black market, the bolivar has weakened 53 percent to 18.39 per U.S. dollar in the past year, according to Lechuga Verde, a website that tracks the rate.
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez spent a ton of money (fiscal stimulus-wise) getting re-elected, and it's left the government with a pretty serious budget deficit.
As Bloomberg's Charlie Devereuz and Jose Orozco explain, "The move can help narrow the budget deficit by increasing the amount of bolivars the government gets from taxes on oil exports."
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/venezuela-bolivar-currency-devaluation-2013-2#ixzz2KN5QkVYQ
Your early Friday morning currency crosses; (8 am)
Friday morning we see some euro strength against the dollar from the close on Thursday. The yen this the morning is very strong against on the dollar, at 92.441 yen to the dollar . The pound, this morning rose against the USA dollar, at 1.5777. The Canadian dollar remained against the dollar. We have a risk is off situation this morning with most European bourses in the green like England and the German DAX up. Gold and silver are down in the early morning, with gold trading at $1669.60 (down 1.60) and silver at $31.45 (down 1 cents)
The SA index is down 20 cents at 80.08
Euro/USA 1.3402 up .0020
USA/yen 92.441 down 1.181
GBP/USA 1.5777 up .0069
USA/Can .9978 flat
end
your closing 10 year bond yield from Spain:
...a slight decrease in yield.
SPANISH GOVERNMENT GENERIC BONDS - 10 YR NOTE
GSPG10YR:IND
5.360.06 1.03%
As of 02/08/2013.
Thursday's yield:
SPANISH GOVERNMENT GENERIC BONDS - 10 YR NOTE
GSPG10YR:IND
5.420.03 0.55%
As of 11:59:54 ET on 02/07/2013.
end.
The Italian 10 year bond yield:
slight decrease in yield.
Thursday's yield:
The Italian 10 year bond yield:
slight decrease in yield.
Italy Govt Bonds 10 Year Gross Yield
+ Add to WatchlistGBTPGR10:IND
4.550.03 0.68%Thursday's yield:
ITALY GOVT BONDS 10 YEAR GROSS YIELD
GBTPGR10:IND
4.580.000.00%
As of 11:59:46 ET on 02/07/2013.
end.
Your 5:00 pm closing Friday currency crosses:
The Euro continued with its morning weakness finishing at the close at 1.3360.
The yen weakened this afternoon after gaining in strength during the overnight session falling to 92.66 to the dollar after rebounding to 92.44 late Thursday night/early Friday morning. . The pound rose slightly more against the dollar . The Canadian dollar fell a tiny fraction against the dollar. The USA index lost a bit to the tune of 7 cents to 80.21.
Euro/USA 1.3360 down .0022
USA/Yen 9266 down .96
GBP/USA 1.5791 up .0083
USA/Can 1.0025 up .0047
end.
Your closing figures from Europe and the USA:
everybody in the green today
everybody in the green today
i) England/FTSE up 35.51 or 0.57%
ii) Paris/CAC up 48.45 or 1.35%
iii) German DAX: up 61.29 or .81%
iv) Spanish ibex up 160.3 points or 2.00%
v) Italian bourse (MIB) down 229.94 points or 1.40%
v) Italian bourse (MIB) down 229.94 points or 1.40%
and the Dow: up 48.92 points or 0.35%
end.
end.
And now the major USA stories of the day:
You must take the data with a grain of salt. However what is clear is the world trade is slowing down.
Finally, one has to wonder with the data as zero hedge eloquently describes:
"Finally, we leave it up to readers to figure out how China can report a December trade surplus with the US of $18.7 billion, while the US just reported a Chinese trade deficit of $24.5 billion."
(courtesy zero hedge)
You must take the data with a grain of salt. However what is clear is the world trade is slowing down.
Finally, one has to wonder with the data as zero hedge eloquently describes:
"Finally, we leave it up to readers to figure out how China can report a December trade surplus with the US of $18.7 billion, while the US just reported a Chinese trade deficit of $24.5 billion."
(courtesy zero hedge)
US Trade Deficit Drops To Lowest Since January 2010 As Crude Imports Plunge To 1997 Levels
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/08/2013 08:54 -0500
Following November's massive trade deficit surge, when the final print of $48.7 billion was far worse than the $41.3 billion expected, it was only (il)logical that the December trade number would reverse this trend to the other extreme, which it did with the December trade balance plunging from a revised $48.6 billion to a tiny $38.5 billion - the lowest deficit since January 2010, and the biggest beat to expectations of $46 billion since February 2009.
The deficit was the result of December exports which were $3.9 billion more than the $182.5 billion in November, and imports some $6.2 billion less than November's total $231.1 billion. Broken down by category, the goods deficit decreased $9.4 billion from November to $56.2 billion, and the services surplus increased $0.7 billion from November to $17.7 billion. A key driver of this move was a spike in Petroleum exports which shrunk the Petroleum product trade gap to the smallest it has been since August 2009 as the US imported the least amount of crude oil since February 1997. Whether this is due to rising domestic production, or just the ongoing collapse in end demand (which is to the US economy as electricity is China's traditional "8%" GDP) remains unclear.
The immediate result of this second consecutive data outlier in a world which as we showed yesterday trade is imploding thus putting all trade data in a very questionable light, is that Q4 GDP will now have to be revised higher due to the bean counters plug of net export data into their GDP calculation. It also means that much of the expected boost to Q1 GDP exports will actually have taken place in December, in turn pushing Q1 GDP forecasts marginally lower.
Specifically, The November to December increase in exports of goods reflected increases in industrial supplies and materials ($3.8 billion); other goods ($0.3 billion); and foods, feeds, and beverages ($0.1 billion). Decreases occurred in capital goods ($0.4 billion); automotive vehicles, parts, and engines ($0.3 billion); and consumer goods ($0.2 billion). The November to December decrease in imports of goods reflected decreases in industrial supplies and materials ($4.2 billion); automotive vehicles, parts, and engines ($0.9 billion); other goods ($0.6 billion); capital goods ($0.3 billion); and foods, feeds, and beverages ($0.1 billion). Consumer goods were virtually unchanged.
Finally, we leave it up to readers to figure out how China can report a December trade surplus with the US of $18.7 billion, while the US just reported a Chinese trade deficit of $24.5 billion.
see zero hedge
end
and on the same theme:
So Who Is Lying (More)?
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 02/08/2013 09:53 -0500
Overnight China reported great trade data which saw exports and imports soar by more than 20% each compared to 2012. Of course, when one adjusts for January calendar effects the "rise" was virtually non-existent but that was too much work for the Shanghai Composite algos. A few hours later, the US did the same, reporting even better trade data which saw the trade deficit plunge the most in nearly three years. So far so good: we just have one question - who is lying more. Because unlike all other sole-sourced economic manipulated data which is solely a function of some excel goal seek model and various spreadsheets, bilateral trade has to foot. One country's net exports have to equal its countepart's net imports and vice versa.
Which is why we compiled the net trade data between the US and China, which was trumpeted earlier to have surpassed a $300 billion ($315 billion to be exact) deficit. At least as reported by the US side. The same "data", when reported from the perspective of China amounts to a surplus of some $219 billion, a difference of $96 billion!
The chart below shows the LTM net exports to the US from China's perspective (in blue) and the net imports from China from the US point of view (in red), with the black line the resulting net difference.
In other words, either China is massively underreporting its net exports to the US or the US is boosting its net imports figure.
Or, just as plausibly, both nations are simply pulling numbers out of thin air - numbers which have a massive impact on both nations' respective GDP prints, which is data that, at least in the Old Normal, used to matter.
end
That is all for today.
I will see you Monday night
Harvey
That is all for today.
I will see you Monday night
Harvey











18 comments:
Thank you harvey for all your efforts, you are appreciated!!
I just find it very indicative of Harvey's personality to see that he feels a need to delete comments from this section of the blog.
Not that the comments are rude, or offensive, contain foul language or even have factual errors.
No, Harvey deletes them because they prove him to be wrong about some of the very basic workings of the metals markets.
So if Harvey doesn't understand the basics, how can his conclusions be relied upon to represent sound thinking??
They can't.
That's why Harvey has to delete anything that shows him to be ignorant.
You can read Harvey's statements showing his complete ignorance of gold forward rates, leases and LIBOR rates in the section of this blog he deleted. The full transcript is here:
http://about.ag/temp/fred.htm
Time to pack it in Harvey. You've been shown to be too lacking in knowledge to have any credibility. Get another hobby.
Getting back to Kid Dynamite's Comment from His Article On "debunking the notion that Cartel's smash price to discourage physical delivery":
He said: "Thus, I’m long SepCheese at $2 – I have done the math on supply and demand and I think it’s worth $3.50."
Okay, at this point, your expectation is for higher prices.
However, Contrary To Your Expectation, You See That The Price Has Dropped in your example to $1.50.
Since Futures Are About Expectations And Not About What's Happening Now, I See This Situation Like Any Trader Would See It.
The Decision Was Based On An Expectation That Turned Out To Be Wrong. Thus, The Sensible "Trader's Options" Are The Following:
1. Get out of the trade and admit you're wrong.
2. Re-evaluate your original decision and conclude the only way to hold this position is to add to losses. Since this decision almost always turns out badly, you're best decision must still be to "cut you're losses".
3. Assuming you are either unaware of, or don't believe manipulation occurs, taking delivery now goes against what has become your new expectation--which is that future prices are expected to drop if you believe them to be falling for legitimate reasons such as some fundamental influence on their price, rather than as a result of pure end-of-the-month manipulation.
You say: "when the price of the asset underlying my futures contract is depressed, it makes standing for physical delivery of the underlying asset more desirable, not less desirable."
UNTRUE--All trading decisions are price expectation decisions unless the commodity is price elastic where you are a user and must have the physical form as part of your business. Otherwise, why have anything to do with cheeseburgers now if you know the price is falling?
--BTW, Cheeseburgers are not silver. Your analogy assumes you need it for some grillmasters convention where obviously, price is elastic. Silver users in industry NEEDING silver now don't respond to price YET. Price is inelastic as the quantities used are miniscule.
HOWEVER, THE CASE OF A MINT MAKING SILVER ROUNDS AND SUCH, IS DIFFERENT AT PRESENT. BECAUSE THEY TAKE DELIVERY OF SUCH LARGE QUANTITIES---YOU ARE CORRECT. THIS IS WHY WE ARE SEEING INCREASED DEMAND FOR SILVER BLANKS, ETC RECENTLY.
BUT THE SPECULATOR, WHO IS SIMPLY TRYING TO MAKE FIAT CURRENCY WITH QUICK TRADES IN AND OUT WITHIN A MONTH OR BY ROLLING TO THE NEXT MONTH IS ENTIRELY DIFFERENT. WOULD HIS DECISION, IF HE'S FOLLOWING THE BASIC TENETS OF TRADING, BE TO SUDDENLY SHIFT HIS STRATEGY AND PUT UP THE WHOLE VALUE OF THE CONTRACT TO TAKE DELIVERY?---I THINK THIS IS A VERY MINOR PORTION OF THE TRADE VOLUME.
Continuing With My Comment As It Was Too Large To Fit Into One Post:
The prudent thing for everyone except the industrial silver blank type manufacturer, (MINTS, etc,) is to cut losses and live to trade another time where you as a successful trader can reassess your reasons for a good entry at some other time when trade set-ups warrant it.
Why would I want to take delivery now at $1.50 when price expectations might reach $1.25 or even $1?---Besides, I can do this with another month to do it by setting up a trade that expires next month and not put up the whole contract value this month at $1.50. Instead, I take the quick loss and live to decide later.
I can't understand why you would not recognize that the nature of trading for the speculator is based on fear and greed---PERIOD.
When prices are going against you, your only logical recourse is to get out of the trade or face the eventual strategy that wipes most speculators from the game, which is generally, adding to losses or relying on HOPE to bail you out of a bad decision.
Taking delivery at this point is definitely not more desirable, except in the case that the commodity that you have positioned yourself with a futures contract is price-elastic requiring you to USE IT BY A GIVEN TIME--COMPELLING YOU TO MAKE DELIVERY DECISIONS BASED ON NEED RATHER THAN PRICE.
Thus, those taking delivery now are not primarily speculators. However, when economic conditions warrant the future expectations of ever-higher prices coupled with perceived and real shortages, you can bet that the desire for talking delivery will overcome fundamental industrial needs or speculative price second-guessing.
To Fred: if you read Reg's comment
to me you would have seen that the lease rate for gold would be affected and it would be downward
Was gold ever in backwardation in any major currency: the answer is yes
in Japanese yen a few years ago.
Why?
the Japanese 6th month rate for money was basically zero.
However the cost of acquiring gold and selling the metal via a lease rate was 2%.
The Japanese had to pay the West's lease rate (2%) and thus in Japanese yen, gold went into backwardation and thus providing sure profits in yen for those selling at spot and buying the futures. Go check the data and you will see that I am correct.
It is interesting that the libor yen had no effect because the lease rate of gold (the cost component) originated in the west.
Today Japan and the West have interest rates at zero but also lease rates are now also zero. Gold is close to not quite in backwardation but that is due to manipulation by the bankers.
It is the lease rate of gold at zero which makes no sense and that was the point I was trying to make.
Harvey
Baltic Dry Index near it's lows for the year and within spitting distance of all time lows;
Baltic Dry Index + Add to Watchlist
BDIY:IND 748.00 -1.00 0.13%
Share
AsSnapshot for Baltic Dry Index (BDIY)
Open: 748.00 Day Range: 748.00 - 748.00 Year To Date: +7.01%
Previous Close: 749.00 52-Week Range: 661.00 - 1,165.00 1-Year: +4.62% of 08:18:52 ET on 02/08/2013.
OK, Harvey, then I guess you have to ask yourself the question...
what determines the lease rate???
What determines at what price a holder of metal will lend out his physical gold to a borrower??
It's NOT the short term interest rate, as you seem to think. The lease rate is determined by the supply and demand by lenders and borrowers of physical metal.
I'll use the housing analogy which I used the other day (before you deleted the comments):
Rates to finance home purchases are at historic lows, but rents in relation to the finance costs are very high. Some time it's the other way around. Sometimes it's more cost-effective to rent than to own.
Let's look at a snapshot in the gold lending market..let's try 1998 just to pick one..
On Jan 2 the 1 month LIBOR was 5.7188 and the 1 month lease rate for gold was 1.7888.
By August 25 the 1 month LIBOR was pretty steady at 5.6445 but the 1 month lease rate had dropped to
.5845.
Why the drop in the gold lending rate?? I'd guess there was a heck of a lot of physical looking for a home, with few takers.
That's the case now with lease rates so low. There's a lot of physical around, despite your conspiracy theories otherwise.
You have a lot of learning to do to figure out how all the pieces come together in the metals market, Harvey, and until you have a better understanding, you just make yourself look silly to those who know the facts.
To FMB---
And then Harvey DELETES the truth when it is posted in his comment section; the easily-provable-just-go-to-the-LBMA-website truth, because it's too embarrassing to him for his readers to find out he really doesn't know what he talking about.
"Why would I want to take delivery now at $1.50 when price expectations might reach $1.25 or even $1?-"
no, jake - why did you GO LONG if you think price expectations might reach 1.25 or even $1?
you went long because you thought prices would go higher - because you thought the asset was worth more than you paid for it. If you thought prices will go lower, you wouldn't be long. If you think the asset is worth more, an the price is currently artificially depressed (which is what harvey continues to allege, via "Raids"), then you won't puke and sell, you'll take delivery.
my important quote from the post was:
""when the price of the asset underlying my futures contract is
depressed, it makes standing for physical delivery of the underlying
asset more desirable, not less desirable."
perhaps for clarity I should have added the word "artificially" before "depressed," as you are contemplating the specific case of artificial downward manipulation, as was I. The statement is a tautology. it's true. it's factual.
also, re: speculators in your other comment: if a speculator never planned to take delivery anyway, he can't be dissuaded from taking delivery. irrelevant.
Trolls,
You ASSUME leasing is ALWAYS driven by a simple, short-term profit motive. This is a FATAL assumption. Of course, you probably know this - you are paid trolls after all.
Your simplistic arguments in how things work IN THEORY are exceedingly transparent. We all know how things are SUPPOSED to work. To rely on theory at this juncture is perilous. We currently exist in a global fiat finance system constantly on the brink of spectacular self-destruction. That is no conspiracy - that is FACT.
If you are anyone else in the exceedingly opaque PM market takes ANYTHING at face value while operating on simple assumptions, they are fools and soon to be very poor fools to boot.
The PM markets are a conflicting morass of spot price-fixing, physical delivery, physical non-delivery, physical holding, physical stealing, physical leverage, physical rehypothecation, paper price-fixing, paper substitution, paper misrepresentation, interest rate fixing, lease rate fixing, and continuous public perception management, surrounded in a murky pool of misreported official pm stores, misreported economic statistics, misreported debt levels, and misreported inflation rates.
Get a clue.
Harvey has every right to delete your pointless, misdirecting drek, at least in so much as it is totally counterproductive to the small trader's financial survival (and you KNOW this, and all the more shame on all of you for persisting in your evil task).
It's Harvey's blog - he can do with it as he wishes. And if you have such stellar pearls of wisdom to impart, then start your own blog.
Hey Harvey, not only do I condone your deletion of these folks(they're not here every single day to read this just to correct it as a courtesy to me and others, who are they kidding?)...
It's your blog, you delete whatever you deem best to delete.
Furthermore....you might consider shelling out just a tiny amount of fiat for a real website....where deleting messages, and more importantly BLOCKING isp #'s is a go.
-Cleburne61
Hey Cleburne61.
I have been a loyal reader of Harveys report for almost three years now but even I have to agree that it is pretty damn sad that Harvey deletes posts that correct his mistakes, his short-comings, lack of knowledge or worse yet made up shit. Harveys report has greatly influenced a lot of people over the years including me and I for one have learned - since Freds appearance - that Harvey is not quite the expert he had portrayed himself to be and I also find it disturbing that he is deleting a commentors post simply because the commentor is setting the record straight. Seems to reason that even a blind follower like you would want the true facts. Give me a fkkn break man!
Great idea cleburne61... I am going to try out replacing blogger comments with disqus.
Fred: I have no idea what you are trying to get it.
For several years, Japan went into gold backwardation in yen terms due to the fact that investors in Japan received yen from selling gold plus a tiny interest rate with a lease rate from the west that was a higher cost.
Backwardation occurs when the investment yield on selling the asset is lower than the cost of acquiring that asset.
And that was exactly what happened in Japan.
The manipulation of the lease rate is a cost and therefore what I stated was absolutely correct
The manipulation of gold libor in USA terms lowered the Lease rate and thus kept gold from entering backwardation
Fred: your argument does not make sense.
In my Japanese case, for a few years (around 2002-2005), gold went into backwardation because investors in Japan upon selling a gold would receive in yen less in yen due to the higher cost of acquiring the gold asset. Japanese investors could only borrow or lease gold from the west and thus backwardation. The Japanese libor had no effect on the leasing of gold nor on the investment dollars received upon selling gold.
Thus the manipulation of libor in the west which certainly influences the cost of leasing gold kept gold close to investment yield and thus preventing gold form entering backwardation.
I have no idea what you are claiming.
Fred: I have no idea what you are trying to get it.
For several years, Japan went into gold backwardation in yen terms due to the fact that investors in Japan received yen from selling gold plus a tiny interest rate with a lease rate from the west that was a higher cost.
Backwardation occurs when the investment yield on selling the asset is lower than the cost of acquiring that asset.
And that was exactly what happened in Japan.
The manipulation of the lease rate is a cost and therefore what I stated was absolutely correct
The manipulation of gold libor in USA terms lowered the Lease rate and thus kept gold from entering backwardation
test
First-ever spot gold trading on the DGCX planned for later this year, why not make it happen faster?
By: Peter Cooper, Arabian Money
-- Posted Monday, 11 February 2013 | Share this article | Source: GoldSeek.com
The Dubai Gold and Commodities Exchange will launch its first-ever spot gold contract later this year allowing UAE traders to buy and sell physical gold on a local exchange for the first time. Gold traders based in the City of Gold are ecstatic about this news reported in The National today.
It’s perhaps surprising that this has taken so long. Presently the DGCX only offers contracts based on the future price of gold, not the current or spot price.
Positive reaction
Traders are delighted by the news and they think it will do a lot to boost liquidity in the Dubai gold market by eliminating the need for offshore credit and collateral to trade in gold. The focus for Dubai is always on the physical trade in gold and the new spot gold contract hits that mark. Exchange traded gold products have not been as successful in Dubai as elsewhere in the world.
However, the DGCX still has a lot of work to do before the contract can be launched. Officials said the contract would need the support of local and international banks and the gold refiners.
‘We are still very much a cash settlement exchange, and in terms of the deliverability of the gold, we want to have the right infrastructure in place to enable us to do that,’ CEO Garry Anderson told The National.
Hot gold market
One can only speculate on how the gold market will look by the time the DGCX gets its spot trading up and running. A huge increase in demand for the yellow metal from China this year and continued global central bank money printing augurs well for gold prices.
It would be better if the DGCX could rap up its procedures in a few months in true Dubai style rather than drag this out for the rest of the year. Do such exchanges not work in real time?
If there is a demand in the marketplace for a spot gold trading contract then why not make it happen now and not wait while other exchanges abroad snap up this business?
Post a Comment