Gold closed the week up $1.00 by to $1585.00. Silver after being whacked early, regained its composure and actually finished up on the day by 4 cents to $27.35. The big news of the day came from Spain where it's 3rd largest city asked for funds as it was basically broke. The Spanish Ibex immediately proceeded to fall close to 6% and the Spanish 10 yr bond yield skyrocketed to 6.27%. Not to be undone, the Italian 10 yr bond yield finished the day at 6.16%. All bourses were in the red but it was Europe that had the deeper red ink. Conditions continue to deteriorate in Europe and this was manifested with a huge fall in the Eur/USA cross finishing the day in the USA at:
1.2154
The German DAX finished its session down 1.9%. Both Paris and Lisbon both had their stock exchanges down 2.14%. The Dow finished down 120 points or .93%. Egan Jones lowered the boom on Spain as they lowered its credit rating to CC plus from CCC-.
Let us now head over to the comex and assess trading on Friday.
The total gold comex OI fell by 5731 contracts as gold rose on Thursday by 10.00 dollars. The bankers were probably frightened a bit by a turn of events in Europe so they thought it was best to lighten up on their shortfall. The non official delivery month of July saw its OI fall from 17 contracts to 9 contracts for a loss of 8 . We had 10 delivery notices filed on Thursday so in essence we gained 2 contracts or 200 oz of additional gold standing. The next big delivery month of August is a little over 1 week away with first day notice on Tuesday, July 31.2012. On Monday night, we will get first day notices filed and on Tuesday night, I will bring to your attention the number of gold ounces that intend to stand. However as we are witnessing lately that in official delivery months, the number of ounces standing will decline due to the antics of our bankers. The August delivery month saw its OI fall from 165,994 to 155,776 as many rolled into October and December and some just vacated the paper arena altogether. The world is catching on pretty fast that the comex is nothing but a rigged game. The estimated volume on Friday was very anemic at 126,092 especially with the rollovers. The confirmed volume on Thursday was a touch higher at 156,178.
The total silver comex OI fell by a tiny 264 contracts falling from 122,590 to Friday's level of 122,326. The front delivery month of July saw its OI fall from 127 to 126 for a loss of 1 contract. We had exactly one notice filed for Thursday so we neither gained nor lost any silver. The August silver month saw a slight decrease of 2 contracts down to 261. The next big delivery month for silver is the September month and here the OI fell slightly from 61,726 down to 61,601. The estimated volume on Friday was mediocre at 37,419. The confirmed volume on Thursday was a touch lower at 36,257.
July 21-.2012
gold:
Gold
|
Ounces
|
Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory in oz
|
nil
|
Withdrawals from Customer Inventory in oz
|
64.30 (Manfra)
|
Deposits to the Dealer Inventory in oz
|
nil
|
Deposits to the Customer Inventory, in
| nil |
No of oz served (contracts) today
|
(0) nil oz
|
No of oz to be served (notices)
|
9 (900)
|
Total monthly oz gold served (contracts) so far this month
|
(722) 72,200
|
Total accumulative withdrawal of gold from the Dealers inventory this month
|
59,824.745
|
Total accumulative withdrawal of gold from the Customer inventory this month
|
36,936.56
|
Not much activity on Friday in the gold vaults.
We only had one transaction and that was another tiny withdrawal from Manfra of 64.3 oz
out of the customer. we had no adjustments.
Thus the dealer inventory rests this weekend at 2.580 million oz or 80.24 tonnes of gold.
The CME notified us that we had zero notices filed for today and thus the total number of notices remain at 722 for 72200 oz. To obtain what is left to be served upon, I take the OI standing for July (9) and subtract out Friday's notices (0) which leaves us with 9 notices or 900 oz of gold left to be served upon our longs.
Thus the total number of gold oz standing in this non official delivery month of July is as follows;
72,200 oz (served) + 900 oz (served) = 73,100 oz
we gained 200 oz of additional gold standing.
and now for silver:
July 21.2012
| Silver |
Ounces
|
| Withdrawals from Dealers Inventory | 107,639.05 (Scotia) |
| Withdrawals from Customer Inventory | 971,834.78 (JPM, Scotia Delaware, HSBC,) |
| Deposits to the Dealer Inventory | nil |
| Deposits to the Customer Inventory | 304,097.00 ( Brinks,Delaware) |
| No of oz served (contracts) | 2 (10,000) |
| No of oz to be served (notices) | 124 (620,000) |
| Total monthly oz silver served (contracts) | 1706 (8,530,000) |
| Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Dealers inventory this month | 107,639.05 |
| Total accumulative withdrawal of silver from the Customer inventory this month | 6,226,348.1 |
July 21.2012
Violent activity inside the silver vaults today.
i) Into Brinks: 300,279.3oz
ii) into Delaware: 3817.70 oz
total deposit: 304,097.00 oz
we had one withdrawal from the dealer side at Scotia:
i) 107,639.05 oz
we had massive withdrawals from the customer side:
i) Out of Scotia: 54,089.13 oz
ii) Out of Delaware: 5079.37 oz
iii) Out of HSBC, 318,126.36 oz
iv) out of JPMorgan: 594,539.90 oz
total customer withdrawal: 971,834.78 oz
the dealer or registered inventory rests this weekend at 40.275 million oz
the total of all silver rests at 142.624 million oz
The CME notified us that we had only 2 notices filed for a total of 10,000 oz. The total number of notices
filed so far this month total 1706 for 8,530,000 oz. To obtain what is left to be served upon, I take the OI standing for July (126) and subtract out Friday's notices (2) which leaves us with 124 notices or 620,000 oz left to be served upon our longs.
Thus the total number of silver ounces standing in this official delivery month of July is as follows;
8,530,000 oz (served) + 620,000 oz (to be served ) = 9,150,000 oz
exactly the same as on Thursday.
end
Sprott and Central Fund of Canada.
The two ETF's that I follow are the GLD and SLV. You must be very careful in trading these vehicles as these funds do not have any beneficial gold or silver behind them. They probably have only paper claims and when the dust settles, on a collapse, there will be countless class action lawsuits trying to recover your lost investment.
There is now evidence that the GLD and SLV are paper settling on the comex.
Thus a default at either of the LBMA, or Comex will trigger a catastrophic event.
Jul21/2012:
July 17.2012:
July 16.2012:
Total Gold in Trust
Tonnes:1,254.64
Ounces:40,337,942.74
Value US$:63,565,972,463.21
July 19.2012:
TOTAL GOLD IN TRUST
Tonnes:1,257.05
Ounces:40,415,551.30
Value US$:64,002,219,520.48
JULY 18.2012:
TOTAL GOLD IN TRUST
Tonnes:1,266.11
Ounces:40,706,586.88
Value US$:64,107,741,767.80
July 17.2012:
TOTAL GOLD IN TRUST
Tonnes:1,266.11
Ounces:40,706,586.88
Value US$:64,515,508,275.28
July 16.2012:
TOTAL GOLD IN TRUST
Tonnes:1,266.11
Ounces:40,706,586.88
Value US$:64,699,393,011.45
another 2.41 tonnes of gold were removed from the GLD vaults. It looks to me like the LBMA is robbing GLD as China is loading its boat of gold and shipping it off to Beijing. If I was a shareholder of GLD I would be voicing my concerns to the SEC. But then again, everything reported to them falls on deaf ears.
And now for silver:
July 21.2012:
July 19.2012
July 18.2012:
July 17.2012:
| Ounces of Silver in Trust | 311,756,579.900 |
| Tonnes of Silver in Trust | 9,696.71 |
July 19.2012
| Ounces of Silver in Trust | 311,756,579.900 |
| Tonnes of Silver in Trust | 9,696.71 |
July 18.2012:
| Ounces of Silver in Trust | 311,756,579.900 |
| Tonnes of Silver in Trust | 9,696.71 |
July 17.2012:
| Ounces of Silver in Trust | 311,756,579.900 |
| Tonnes of Silver in Trust | 9,696.71 |
July 16.2012:
| Ounces of Silver in Trust | 311,756,579.900 |
| Tonnes of Silver in Trust | 9,696.71 |
we neither gained nor lost any silver at the SLV today. Notice the difference between silver and gold.
And now for our premiums to NAV for the funds I follow:
(both of these funds have 100% physical metal behind them and unencumbered and I can vouch for that)
And now for our premiums to NAV for the funds I follow:
(both of these funds have 100% physical metal behind them and unencumbered and I can vouch for that)
And now for our premiums to NAV for the funds I follow:
(both of these funds have 100% physical metal behind them and unencumbered and I can vouch for that)
(both of these funds have 100% physical metal behind them and unencumbered and I can vouch for that)
1. Central Fund of Canada: traded to a positive 2.1percent to NAV in usa funds and a positive 2.4% to NAV for Cdn funds. ( July 21-.2012)
2. Sprott silver fund (PSLV): Premium to NAV rose to 3.26% to NAV July 21 2012 :
3. Sprott gold fund (PHYS): premium to NAV rose to 2.91% positive to NAV July 19.2012). .
Finally, we are now starting to see premiums return to the Sprott silver fund. No doubt, in 3 to 4 weeks we will be back to previous premium levels as inventories around the world deplete in silver. The fact that Sprott removed 250 million dollars worth of silver is a dagger to our bankers.
end
Gold COT Report - Futures
Large Speculators
Commercial
Total
Long
Short
Spreading
Long
Short
Long
Short
180,474
51,515
32,493
162,570
321,389
375,537
405,397
Change from Prior Reporting Period
-1,682
-4,406
2,261
-829
5,224
-250
3,079
Traders
151
64
80
46
42
231
165
Small Speculators
Long
Short
Open Interest
55,780
25,920
431,317
1,713
-1,616
1,463
non reportable positions
Change from the previous reporting period
COT Gold Report - Positions as of
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
In our Gold COT report:
Our large speculators:
Those large speculators that have been long in gold pitched 1682 contracts from their long side.
Those large speculators that have been short in gold covered a rather large 4406 contracts.
Our commercials:
Those commercials that have been long in gold pitched a very small 829 contracts.
Those commercials that have been short in gold added a very large 5224 contracts to their short side.
Our small specs:
Those small specs that have been long in gold added another 1713 contracts to their long side
Those small specs that have been short in gold covered 1616 contracts from their short side.
Conclusion:
slightly more bearish and thus an explanation as to why the bankers were trying to whack gold on Wednesday, Thursday and yesterday but failed.
Silver COT Report: Futures
Large Speculators
Commercial
Long
Short
Spreading
Long
Short
28,431
20,775
24,156
48,214
63,349
-3
1,123
-2,128
-157
871
Traders
58
47
46
38
34
Small Speculators
Open Interest
Total
Long
Short
121,819
Long
Short
21,018
13,539
100,801
108,280
-2
-2,156
-2,290
-2,288
-134
non reportable positions
Positions as of:
123
107
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
© SilverSeek.com
And now for our silver COT:
It seems that the players have vacated the silver arena:
Those large specs that have been long in silver pitched a minuscule 3 contracts from their long side.
Those large specs that have been short in silver added a tiny 1123 contracts to their short side.
Those commercials that are long in silver and close to the physical scene pitched a tiny 157 contracts from their long side.
Those commercials that have been perennially short in silver and subject to the silver CFTC probe, added another 871 contracts to their short side.
Small specs:
Those small specs that have long in silver pitched a very tiny 2 contracts from their long side.
Those small specs that have been short in silver covered 2156 contracts from their short side.
Conclusion:
it looks like the rats are leaving the ship!!
The following is a review of gold trading Thursday night from Europe and Asia with commentaries
from Goldcore.
(courtesy Goldcore)
Gold Q2, 2012 - Investment Statistics And Commentary
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 12:09 -0400
- Bridgewater
- British Pound
- Budget Deficit
- China
- Debt Ceiling
- Dubai
- Eurozone
- Global Economy
- Hong Kong
- India
- International Monetary Fund
- Monetary Policy
- Precious Metals
- Recession
- Reuters
- Ron Paul
- Swiss Franc
- Twitter
- United Kingdom
- Volatility
- World Gold Council
- Yen
Submitted by GoldCore
Gold Q2, 2012 - Investment Statistics And Commentary
Today's AM fix was USD 1,583.00, EUR 1,291.30, and GBP 1,007.83 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,580.00, EUR 1,287.06 and GBP 1,009.33 per ounce.
Silver is trading at $27.07/oz, €22.22/oz and £17.32/oz. Platinum is trading at $1,418.25/oz, palladium at $577.80/oz and rhodium at $1,190/oz.
Gold rose $3.70 or 0.23% in New York yesterday and closed at $1,581.00/oz. It rose as high as $1,590/oz prior to determined selling which saw gold fall. Gold ticked higher in Asia prior to falling soon after the European open.
Gold has been trading in a range between $1,530/oz and $1,630/oz for nearly 2 months despite the Eurozone debt crisis entering its 3rd year and looking set to escalate and despite signs that the US economy is on the verge of a sharp recession.
These two factors alone mean that gold will likely resume its upward march due to continuing safe haven demand. The likelihood of further QE from the Fed will be icing on the cake for gold and silver.
US data yesterday showed factory activity shrunk in July for a 3rd consecutive month and the jobless claims rose last week.
Those who continue to put “lipstick on the pig” that is the US economy are lulling themselves and other unfortunates into another false sense of security.
“Blue skies thinking” regarding individual economies and the global economy got us into this mess and it will not get us out.
The World Gold Council have just published their commentary on gold’s price performance in various currencies, its volatility statistics and correlation to other assets in the quarter -
It provides macroeconomic context to the investment statistics published at the end of each quarter and highlights emerging themes relevant to gold’s future development.
One of their key findings is that gold will act as hedge against possible coming dollar weakness and gold will act as a "currency hedge in the international monetary system."
Key findings of the World Gold Council’s report:
Review: Key Macroeconomic Themes During Q2 2012
Gold prices declined in most currencies during the second quarter with the exception of the euro, Swiss franc and Indian rupee, in part due to a strong US dollar. Despite a 3.8% decline in Q2 to US$1,598.50/oz on the London PM fix, gold was up 4.4% during the first half of the year. Volatility remained elevated amidst a busy event-risk period. However, gold generally outperformed risk assets.
Global inflation eases but underlying trends supportive for gold: A substantial drop in energy and some agricultural commodities during the period has eased inflation pressures in many parts of the world and put downward pressure on gold prices.
Reassessing “risk-free” assets: Even assets traditionally considered safe are under pressure. German Bunds interest rates climbed in June. The Swiss franc, yen and US Treasuries are also facing issues – challenging their role as assets of last resort. Despite pressures on the price of gold, its lack of credit risk, its liquidity and hedging characteristics has made gold an attractive vehicle for long-term wealth preservation.
Correlation between gold and risk assets approaches long-term averages: Gold’s correlation to equities and other risk assets fell towards long-run average levels in Q2 helping portfolio diversification. Gold’s increased correlation to equities in Q1 was an indirect effect related to a weaker global economy coupled with a stronger US dollar.
Outlook: Emerging Macroeconomic Themes In H2 2012
Deflationary concerns in some countries provide room for further fiscal and monetary stimulus. This may lead to a further debasement of currencies through unconventional monetary policy and an increased risk of future inflation. These factors should provide support for future gold investment.
The underlying structural issues that affect the euro zone remain unresolved, despite advances in the formation of more comprehensive burden-sharing mechanisms. In such an environment of uncertainty and higher market volatility, gold will continue to be an asset that investors use to diversify risk and preserve capital.
The flight to the US dollar as a safe-haven in the first half of 2012 could be reversed. The US debt ceiling debate in Q3 and federal elections in November, followed by the necessity to confront a US$1.3tn budget deficit will prove challenging to the US dollar. With most currencies under pressure in one form or another, gold is likely to provide a hedging mechanism for investors
Dr. Constantin Gurdgiev, a non Executive member of theGoldCore Investment Committee, has analysed the Q2, 2012 World Gold Council data and has written a blog post that can be read here or see commentary.
He finds that the report is worth a read as it shows how gold generally outperformed risk assets and helped portfolio diversification.
He warns that safe haven government debt markets have all the hallmarks of “return-free risks” rather than “risk-free returns.”
The World Gold Council’s ‘Quarterly statistics commentary Q2 2012’ can be read here.
(Bloomberg) -- China Plans to Start Interbank Gold Trading on Local Market
China is preparing to introduce an interbank gold-trading system, a move that may enable domestic banks to treat the precious metal as a more liquid asset and increase holdings.
The Shanghai Gold Exchange, the country’s biggest spot market, has been working with the China Foreign Exchange Trade System since the start of the year, Gu Wenshuo, an exchange spokesman, said today. The original plan was for the new system to be running at the end of August, Gu said by phone, adding that details are unavailable as banks are giving feedback.
China has been the largest producer since 2007, and was the biggest user after India last year. An interbank gold-trading system is part of broader reforms that Beijing aims to introduce to make the financial sector more market-driven, according to Jiang Shu, a senior analyst at Industrial Bank Co. Ltd.
“China is already very important in terms of gold production and consumption,” said Jeffrey Rhodes, global head of precious metals in Dubai at INTL FCStone Inc., a New York- based trading and brokerage firm. “If a new interbank market really does flourish, it could put the Chinese market in the mainstream and become world-class.”
Spot gold was 0.2 percent higher at $1,584.65 an ounce at 3:38 p.m. in Shanghai. The metal, which reached a record $1,921.15 in September, has rallied for 11 years on emerging- market and investment demand, as well as central-bank purchases.
Gold imports by mainland China from Hong Kong reached 314,810 kilograms in the first five months, compared with 39,607.4 kilograms a year ago, according to Bloomberg calculations based on data from the Hong Kong government.
For breaking news and commentary on financial markets and gold, follow us on Twitter.
NEWS
Gold steady on weak U.S. data; dollar weighs – Reuters
Gold advances for second day - MarketWatch
UK housing slump will deepen, warns IMF – The Telegraph
COMMENTARY
Dr Gurdgiev: Q2 Report From The World Gold Council – True Economics
China’s Coming Assault on the Western Financial System – The Daily Reckoning
World economy now effectively a multitrillion-dollar game of chicken – Resource Clips
LBMA's gold price fixing scheme about to collapse, London trader tells KWN
Submitted by cpowell on Fri, 2012-07-20 19:07. Section: Daily Dispatches
3p ET Friday, July 20, 2012
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
The London trader source of King World News reports today that the nakedness of unallocated and even some supposedly allocated positions in the London bullion market now is being discussed openly and he expects defaults resulting in cash settlement as the prices of gold and silver vault higher. He adds that demand from China is steady and that China has accumulated far more metal than is being reported. An excerpt from the interview is headlined "The LBMA Gold Price Fixing Scheme Is Over" and it's posted at the King World News blog here:
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
end
Jim Sinclair launches operation: Investor's Spring Freedom against our crooked bankers.
He urges us to approach mining CEO's and tell them our concerns at what the big bankers are doing to our economy:
Investor’s Spring–Freedom!
My Dear Extended Family,
Investor’s Spring. Freedom at last!
You know that I have spent a good part of my life in an attempt to better understand the human experience looking for purpose. I would like to share with you a short conversation I had with Sai Baba in India in 1986. He said to me "What would you do if I made you a warrior?" The room was full of spiritually liberal people. I answered "make great war." There was a collective gasp by the attendees. Sai Baba said, "Right Answer, Sinclair."
Nobody wants war, but if it comes your way, and is your duty to pursue, it must be done, and done well. This war has been brought to us by those that would profit by destruction in clear violation of common commercial code.
These demons do not just short a situations based on a premise and await profit.
They pound mercilessly on the bids, seeking to depress the price.
They sell short the shares index and other funds buy as a means to get large numbers.
They immediately start dirty tricks.
They turn you in to regulatory bodies in the area of your trading and in the country of your operation on constructed nonsense.
They seek authors to write negative articles from their imagination to insult your integrity as a company not only where you work, but also where you trade.
They pay people to adopt a multitude of nicknames to post horrific lies about you personally and your company on chat boards.
They have a trading campaign to sell every instance of good news you have.
They have a trading campaign to sell your positive closes within the last 30 seconds of the trading day.
They enter orders with brokers who know what they want to happen in sizes larger than the total average daily trading to sell at the market on the close of Fridays.
They trade other exchange listed shares on the NASDAQ out of line with the listed close to skew the closing prices to the negative.
They actually paint the charts with their trading to make your situation less attractive technically.
These are only a few of the standard dirty tricks they execute in order to profit from these illegal acts to profit from the short which is the fruit of their crimes.
Their offense is violation of common commercial code. The short is simply the means of illicit profits. I do not intend to preach to you, but rather lead by example.
Your job is to get the attention first of those that are the management and directors of the companies you invest in that have been manipulated. You may have to be strong in order to accomplish this.
I am obligated in my corporate position to defend the company to the limit of my ability. I am obligated to say no, not on my watch. I am obligated to use all means, including litigation, to protect capital value on behalf of the investors. If I failed to do that I would be liable to you. This is true of every investment you have, not only precious metals shares.
Step one of "Investor’s Spring, Freedom" is to raise hell with the management and directors of your investments to take action to protect your interests from illegal and unethical activities. Tell them remedy exists in common commercial code moreso than securities laws.
I will let you know what I am doing as I do it. I will lead other companies to protect you by example.
It is up to you to do one simple thing. Wake up this bunch of brain dead office decorations, professional campers and rock hounds and get them to follow me in my march forward.
Respectfully,
Jim
end
Our friends over at the Silverdoctors.com web site has released the audio of the interview with Bill Murphy of GATA with respect to his London source. As a reminder, this London trader's views on what will happen have been 100% accurate over these past several years. The London trader believes that silver will explode in August.
Will it be because of the CFTC ruling that will be coming? Do not know, but something big is going to happen.
Listen...
10,276
end
Overnight in Europe we witnessed the risk is off trade with all Asian and European bourses in the red. The Euro/USA cross proceeded south and at 8 am est was trading at 1.2234. All eyes were on Spain with respect to the terms of what it will receive for its banking rescue. If you will recall, 30 billion euros was to come by the end of July. Markets were waiting for official news on this and on new terms. Loans will be forthcoming once stress tests on the banks in question commence.
The 10 yr Spanish bond yield again traded wider at 7.11%, with the Italian 10 year bond yield rising above the 6% level trading at 6.10%
(your overnight sentiment from Europe, courtesy zero hedge 8.am est Friday morning)
Overnight Sentiment: Europe Threatens Market Surreality Again
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 07:08 -0400
It is a quiet session so far with risk in the Off position (for now - we have yet to see the sinusoid HFT stop triggering function which rises stocks artificially as yesterday demonstrated so very well to nobody's surprise). All eyes are once again focusing to Europe, pushing the EURUSD lower for at least a few more hours until Europe closes and the repatriation resumes. In terms of key European events, today is the EU finance minister’s conference call on Spain today. As DB summarizes, officials are expected to approve the EU100 billion Spanish bank rescue plan however the exact size of the loan will probably only be determined in September pending the result of a bank-by-bank stress test. This will then pave way for restructuring plans for the sector in October which is broadly consistent with the timeline set out in the leaked draft MoU. At the previous meeting finance ministers agreed to first disburse EU30bn to Spain by the end of July so we will watch out for further confirmation of this today. We may also get the terms of the loan today. The conference call is expected to start at 10am GMT. What is odd is that unlike before when the mere possibility of a European catalyst was enough to push risk higher, this is no longer the case, and Spanish spreads to Bunds just hit another all time wide, with the Spanish 10 Year plunging to 7.11%, another post-summit high, this time dragging the Italian 10 Year which was at 6.10% at last check. And as explained before, the European uber pair trade means that as PIIGS yields soar, the core drops to new record, in most cases, negative nominal lows.
Will the world once again be able to ignore the once-again imploding European reality (and American: Of the 35 S&P 500 firms that reported results yesterday, about 74% of those came ahead of market consensus but only 57% of those topped sales forecasts.), and send the ES to a green close on the day? Or is today the day when reality comes back with a vengeance? Stay tuned and find out.
end
Opening Spanish 10 yr yield at 8 am est:
SPANISH GOVERNMENT GENERIC BONDS - 10 YR NOTE
Add to Portfolio
GSPG10YR:IND
7.100000.08900 1.27%
Your opening Italian 10 yr bond yield: (8 am est)
Italy Govt Bonds 10 Year Gross Yield
Add to Portfolio
GBTPGR10:IND
6.066000.06500 1.08%
As of 07:40:00 ET on 07/20/2012.
end
In the following video, Stratfor's Adrian Bosoni highlights the fundamental contradictions and the major flaw in the European financial crisis. We see that ECB board member Asmussen, and German minister Schaeuble both steadfastly state that there will be no money transfer without a sovereignty (fiscal) transfer. Bosoni states correctly that this is the proper way to proceed on a long term basis in order to have a robust and unified budgetary regime. The flaw: the length of time to ratify this. Spain, Portugal, and Greece all have very short time horizons due to their massive problems and all have asked for a delay in implementing a balancing of their budgetary deficits. In other words, the PIIGS nations are asking for continual bailouts with the hope that they will get their act together.
the video is a must see as it gives a terrific review of the problems facing Spain and other PIIGS nations. This was released a few hours before the Valencia announcement.The video is 3 1/2 minutes.
(courtesy, Bosoni/Stratfor/zero hedge)
Europe's Fundamental Flaw Resurfaces
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/19/2012 19:54 -0400
"Two weeks after a summit that promised to bring solutions to the European financial crisis, the European Union has once again revealed its fundamental contradictions" is how Stratfor's Adrian Bosoni introduces a succinct clip on the reality the European leaders faced once they arrived home after that strenuous weekend of blithering. Between Asmussen and Schaeuble who have steadfastly stuck to the no-monetary-transfer-without-sovereign-transfer tack - which actually make a fair amount of sense on a long-term basis - a robust and unified budgetary regime is precisely what Europe has lacked. Unfortunately, Bosoni notes, "even in a best case scenario this could not be achieved before 2015" thanks to treaties, referenda, and ratifications. In a little over 3 minutes, the analyst outlines exactly what is holding it back and why the short-term is all they have as budgetary discipline is proving particularly difficult for the EU members to maintain (see more Spanish riots tonight). Between Spain's delays in meeting targets, Greece's 'impossible' budgetary goals, Ireland's demands for concessions, and Finland's collateral agreement with Spain, unifying anything over there seems impractical and impossible.
A must watch for the quickest summary of the state of Europe - and the best explanation of the reality to which European credit markets are cracking as opposed to the nominal price of global equities leaking higher...
Valencia Announces SOS, Needs To Tap Government LIquidity Support Just Eurogroup Accepts Spanish Bailout Plan
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 07:58 -0400
Just as today's largely expected announcement that the Eurogroup has formally agreed to accept the Spanish bail out (details still lacking), the Spanish region of Valencia just became the second to officially demand a bailout following Catalunya's comparable announcement at the end of May, and has announced it will need to tap the government liquidity mechanism. Kneejerk reaction: EURUSD sharply lower and below 1.22 for the first time in days.
From Reuters:
Spain's heavily indebted eastern region of Valencia said on Friday it would apply for help under the government's 18 billion euro plan passed on Thursday aimed at helping regional finances.
The plan comes with strict conditionality that a region stick to its deficit cutting plans.
Concurrent with this announcement, Spain also announced an update to its deficit projections, whose details are meaningless as they will be revised adversely shortly, which confirmed that the Spanish economy continues to deteriorate at an accelerating pace.
Spanish Stocks Plunge Most In 12 Months As Egan-Jones Cuts Spain To CC+
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 10:50 -0400
With IBEX down 6%, 10Y yields over 7.30%, 10Y spread over 610bps, and EURJPY at 12 year lows; the hits just keep coming. From Ega-Jones:
Slipping - Spain's 10 year debt is now yielding 7.18%, which is a reflection of the weakening of the economy and the credit quality of Spain. In addition to the expected austerity riots, the latest news is that Valencia and other regions will need $15B of aid, the sen. debtholders of the weak banks will be forced to take losses, and there might be some sharing of losses among all banks. An estimated decline in GDP of 1.7% (per the Economy Ministry), the 25% unemployment, the IIF's recent estimate of addl bank loan losses up to EUR260B, and possible depositor withdrawals hurt. From 2008 to 2011, Spain's debt mushroomed from EUR436B to EUR735B while its GDP declined from EUR1.09T to EUR1.07T. Social benefits are a major problem; while pmts to the govt have been more or less flat over the past four years (up EUR 3B), payments from the government have been up EUR 45B. As a result, Spain is short about EUR50B per year for social payments, EUR20B per year for interest, and an additional EUR 20B for asset growth; hence the EUR90B per annum increase in debt.
Spain will inevitably be faced with addl pmts to support a portion its banking sector and for its weaker provinces. Assets of Spain's largest two banks exceed its GDP. We are slipping our rating to "CC+"; watch for more requests for support from the banks and money creation.
via Bloomberg.
Europe Ends In A Sea Of Red
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 11:47 -0400
Spain's broad equity index suffered its second largest single-day drop in almost 4 years and Italy also tumbled almost 5% as everything European was sold hard. EuroStoxx (the broad Dow equivalent) is down almost 3% as EURUSD dropped to two year lows, EURJPY to 12 year lows. AAA safe havens were massively bid with Germany, Denmark, and Switzerland all to new low (negative) rate closes. Core equity markets did suffer though with Germany down 2% but it was the periphery that saw the damage in credit-land with Spain 10Y closing at 7.27%, 610bps over Bunds (and 5Y CDS over 605bps). Spanish spreads are +130bps from post-Summit (and pre-Summit) and Italy +78bps, but it is the front-end of the curve that is most worrisome - Spain's 2Y is 132bps wider in the last week. Europe's VIX exploded by over 4 vols to 24%today and once again looks decidedly high relative to US VIX.
Spain and Italy surging to as bad a performance as Portugal...post Summit...
but it is the front-end that is a disaster! This is where all the LTRO debt is being held that was put on as part of the Sarkozy carry trade - ECB margin calls here we come!!
but while this is apples to apple-like things comparisons, the difference between credit and equity market reactions post Summit remain remarkable...(though today saw a pretty decent turnaround)...
and broadly European stocks were hammered today as hope fades...
charts: Bloomberg
end
From the USA side of things, Bruce Krasting weighs in on Schumer's choice of words to Bernanke this week: " get to work, Mr Bernanke"
The Fed will have another FOMB meeting on August 1.
It is there that they will decide on the following;
1. Do nothing
ii) Extend ZIRP to 2014
iii) Announce another QEIII of say 250- 600 billion dollars
iv) Cut the deposit rate from 1/4% to 1/8%
Krasting believes it will be the latter and he gives his reasons why.
Also the consequences of that action.
(a must read)
Bernanke - Post Schumer Gaffe
Submitted by Bruce Krasting on 07/20/2012 08:59 -0400
- Ben Bernanke
- Bond
- China
- Copper
- CRAP
- European Central Bank
- Fail
- Finland
- Germany
- India
- Monetary Policy
- Ron Paul
- Switzerland
- Yield Curve
I'm adding myself to the long list of folks who have commented on NY Senator Chuck Schumer's choice of words to Bernanke the other day:
.
.
.
Schumer is a political hack. He wants the Fed to do ‘something’ today that would give the economy a lift heading into the election. Chuck knows that the Legislative side can’t/won’t do a thing before November, so he begs Ben to light another monetary fire to help the Democratic cause. Chucky boy is an ass.
I doubt that Bernanke listens to the noise from Senators very often, but Chuck’s words got a lot of press. I'm wondering what Ben is thinking. Schumer has brought politics into the outcome of the August 1st Fed meeting. Whatever Ben decides to do, he will be accused of partisan politics.
There are many scenarios for the August Fed meeting:
.
I) Do nothing
.
Arguments For:
a) The economy stinks, but it is not in a crisis. More “crisis monetary measures” are not justified.
b) With the 10-year already at 1.5%, the Fed can’t accomplish anything by pushing rates a few basis points lower.
Arguments Against:
The election and related political considerations will absolutely tie the Feds hands after the August meeting. The next chance for the Fed to “do something” will be in late November. If Bernanke wants to buy some insurance, he has to do something in August.
.
II) Extend the ZIRP language past 2014
.
Arguments For:
I can’t think of any.
Arguments Against.
Because there is no substance to this, there is a very strong likely hood that the markets will take a few seconds, and then puke. Bernanke knows this. He doesn’t want to lay an egg.
.
III) QE3 – $600B LSAP targeted to Agency Mortgage Bonds
.
Arguments For:
a) This is what the market wants to see. Failure to do QE3 will disappoint, Ben does not want to disappoint.
b) This a is “populist” approach. Ben can say that he is doing his best to allow homeowners to ReFi and prospective buyers to get a record low rate.
Arguments Against:
a) This is an “all in bet”. Even Bernanke has been questioning the efficacy of additional QE of late.
b) Senator Shelby and Speaker Boehner will say, “The Fed is printing money to play politics!”
c) Bernanke’s critics will go wild.
d) There is absolutely no certainty that another big LSAP will do a damn thing.
.
IV) QE3 - $250B LSAP targeted to Agency Mortgage Bonds
Arguments For:
A small QE would create less political backlash. Ben could argue that he is being “moderate” and will, as always, be willing to do more if this modest monetary “bump” proves to be inadequate.
Arguments Against:
a) A “half a loaf” is going to fail miserably. Bernanke wants monetary policy to jack up stocks, as he thinks this creates jobs. Stocks would nose dive if this is the result. Bernanke understands this.
b) Both Blues and Reds would be upset. Schumer will be pointing at Bernanke and saying, “He didn’t do his job!” At the same time Ron Paul would be calling for Ben’s head on a platter.
.
V) Something Else – A cut in the deposit rate from a 1/4% to a 1/8%
.
Arguments For:
a) This appears to be a modest step. As such, it would be less susceptible to criticism.
b) The small change in the deposit rate would achieve something that Bernanke has been shooting for a long time.Returns on short-term money would go negative. Three and Six month Bills would certainly be negative. One-year paper would trade around flat.
c) Germany and Switzerland are already in negative territory. Other, smaller bond markets like Finland and Sweden are also in the red. For the US to follow suit would not be that big a surprise. Bernanke could blunt critics by saying he had done less than Europe - an 1/8th in the US versus 0% for the ECB.
d) The change to negative yields, (regardless of how small), will force money to move around. There are trillions in money market funds, Trillions in short term Treasury paper, and trillions more on corporate balance sheets. All of this is now going to be looking at negative returns.
e) With the first rungs of the yield curve in the bucket, the longer maturities would be dragged down. The Ten-year would move toward 1%. This result would be similar to the (hoped for) outcome of a large LSAP.
f) Bernanke could still say, “The Fed has more it could do”, as the deposit rate could be cut again (to zero) at some point.
.
Of these options, I believe that #V has the greatest probability of occurring.
I hope that the Fed sits tight, and does nothing. But that seems unlikely. Bernanke knows that the economy is now decelerating, and that his hands get tied after the August meeting. So“something” is more likely than “nothing”.
It’s hard to predict what might happen if Ben pushes rates into negative territory. It could end up resulting in an orderly market transition from cash, to high-risk securities like stocks and junk bonds. The virtuous cycle of higher stocks leading to higher spending and more jobs might be the result. But I doubt it.
Arguments Against:
a) The knee jerk reaction to negative rates might be positive, but in a short period of time the market will come to realize that negative rates are not going to force people (more) into dividend stocks. Quite the opposite, it will scare the crap out of them.
b) This is not good for the banks (who cares); but the financials are still a big chunk of the S&P.
c) This move will likely cause more “unwanted inflation”. If China or India is faced with negative returns on their reserves, they might be inclined to just buy commodities with the billions of cash they are sitting on. Prices of grains, beans, copper, coal and oil come to mind. Gold would be on the list as well.
d) If three-month bills went from +8bp to -7bp you might think that it wouldn't matter. The change is so small on a relative basis. I think of it as stepping off the edge of a cliff.
The entire global financial system is based on fiat money and the presumption that the money has “value” as a store of wealth. Nearly every action by the Fed over the past few years has led to the debasement of money. In the final stage, the issuers of money debase it to the point where it is no longer desirable to hold. I see the move to negative rates across the globe as a tipping point, one that will be damn hard to reverse once undertaken.
.
.
end
It seems that our Libor rate setters took "requests" from companies to alter their rate so that they could earn big money.
This is getting hotter by the minute:
(courtesy zero hedge)
The Hedge Fund Trail In Liborgate Gets Hotter: Mega Fund Brevan Howard Next?
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 12:55 -0400
- Barclays
- Brevan Howard
- British Bankers' Association
- Convexity
- Exchange Traded Fund
- fixed
- LIBOR
- RBS
- Reality
- Switzerland
Two days ago we made the "missing link" connection between traders in Libor manipulating banks (all of which curiously had a hub in Singapore: something else for the media that has been about 4 years too late on this topic to focus on) and hedge funds (most of which curiously centering on the otherwise sleepy bastion of banking: Geneva, Switzerland). The immediate aftermath was the loss of trading privileges of one Michael Zrihen. We are fairly certain this is just the beginning of the hedge fund bust: when all is said and done, many more funds will have terminated traders they hired for reasons (and kickbacks) unknown over the past 2 years as Lie-bor manipulators sought to put a clean firewalled break between their old employer and current one. Because apparently sometimes the regulators are that stupid and can be confused by a simple job change. And while many have assumed (and even calculated based on completely groundless assumptions) that only BBA member banks have benefited from Libor manipulation, the reality is that hedge funds were just as complicit and benefited just as much if not more. What is worse, they took advantage of their whale client status with manipulating banks, and courtesy of Total Return Swap and other leveraged gimmicks, made far more money when they co-opted two or more banks to do their bidding. Impossible you say: hedge funds would never be so stupid. Oh very possible: we present exhibit A - Brevan Howard, a "fund, with assets of $20.8 billion as of Dec. 31, has never had a losing year and returned 14.4 percent annualized from its April 2003 inception through the end of 2008" as Bloomberg said in a made to order profile of the funds recently. Perhaps there is a very simple reason for this trading perfection: "Brevan Howard telephoned on 20 Aug 2007 to ask the defendant to change the Libor rate," according to a paper filed with the Singapore High Court cited by Bloomberg."
Here is The Telegraph with a smoking gun that was promptly buried in the avalanche of sudden media coverage in the aftermath of the Barclays Liborgate settlement.
Tan Chi Min, a former RBS trader who claims he was wrongfully dismissed by the bank after it fired him for allegedly trying to manipulate Libor - the average rate at which banks lend to each other - said he had received the request in 2007 from Brevan Howard.
"Brevan Howard telephoned on 20 Aug 2007 to ask the defendant to change the Libor rate," according to a paper filed with the Singapore High Court cited by Bloomberg.
Oops.
That one statement should be enough to send shivers into the heart of whoever may be General Counsel of Brevan Howard (and many other mega funds right now whose names will make front page appearances in the coming weeks), as it provides the banks with something that so far has been missing. Motive. Because while it may be difficult to prove that Barclays or RBS benefited from Libor manipulation, pandering to a mega client is very, very easy to prove - there is always a trace. It also makes it very easy for the prosecution to include hedge funds, which are just as hated by the general populace as big banks if not more, into what is shaping up as one perfect litigation storm (and distraction from the real culprit here: the global central bank cartel).
Telegraph goes on:
The court filing alleges RBS "received this request without objection". Brevan Howard is not a party to the lawsuit and is not being investigated or sued for any alleged wrongdoing. RBS and Brevan Howard both declined to comment.
Mr Tan claimed in his filing that Scott Nygaard, head of short-term markets finance at RBS, knew about the call from Brevan Howard. However, the filing contained no further details to support his allegations. However, he is reported to have said he would provide further evidence at a later stage.
The legal case follows Mr Tan's firing in December over allegations he had attempted to improperly influence RBS's Libor-setting staff between 2007 and 2011. Mr Tan, who worked for RBS in Singapore as head of delta trading, claims he was wrongfully dismissed by the bank.
Ah yes our old friends: the ubiquitous Delta Traders who somehow have a finger in everything from ETF trading, to gamma, to convexity trades, and now- serving as the nexus between Libor manipulation demanding clients and in house Libor fixers.
The plot just gets thicker and thicker.
Mr Tan is claiming $1.5m (£943,000) in bonuses and 3.3m RBS shares that he says the bank owes him in pay. He claims in his lawsuit that asking for changes in Libor was "common practice" among RBS traders and that the bank "took requests from clients" to alter the rate.
And there it is: "Took requests from clients" not just manipulated rates for its own interest. And this is where the universe of guilty parties explodes exponentially, and reaches not only Geneva Switzerland, but virtually every single hedge fund that had even a modest fixed income trading link over the past decade.
Watch this space closely: it will get very hot soon.
end
The mayor of Baltimore is taking on the Libor crooks and will sue for millions!!!
(courtesy the London Guardian) and special thanks to Don Jack for providing...
HEADLINE: 'We are not afraid' ... US mayor suing for millions over Libor
BYLINE: Dominic Rushe New York
BODY:
A little over two years ago Stephanie Rawlings-Blake had never heard of Libor. The mayor of Baltimore had other things to keep her occupied. Elected in 2010, she was dealing with the aftermath of a financial crisis that had left her city with a budget deficit of $120m (£76m) and the cost of cleaning up the worst two-day snow storm in the city's history. And then she found out the credit crunch had come back to take another bite out of the city's finances.
Baltimore is lead plaintiff in a class action suit which alleges that banks including Barclays, Bank of America, HSBC, JP Morgan and UBS conspired to fix a set of key interest rates - the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) - and cost the city millions in the process. So far the Libor scandal has played out mostly under the radar in the US. But now the affair is gaining traction in Washington and Baltimore's lawsuit is putting a human face on a scandal legal experts predict could end up being the most costly of the credit crisis. Rawlings-Blake claims firemen, services for the elderly, school programmes and more are being cut as a direct result of the bankers' actions.
According to the court documents Baltimore bought "tens of millions of dollars' worth of interest rate swaps" during the period when the alleged fixing took place. The suit alleges that between August 2007 and May 2010 the defendants conspired to suppress Libor below the levels at which it would have been set had they accurately reported their borrowing costs. Those manipulations had "severe adverse consequences" for Baltimore and others, according to the suit. Other US cities are watching carefully.
Baltimore had no choice but to fight, said Rawlings-Blake. "We are faced with closing fire companies, recreational centres, we have services that have been cut year after year, services that people depend on. Opportunities for young people, cleanliness of the city, everything is affected by the budget. We can't afford to leave money on the table."
The city has a reputation for taking on the banks. This month Wells Fargo settled a suit launched by the city four years ago that alleged it discriminated against black and Latino mortgage borrowers.
"It's certainly disappointing and I understand why a lot of people have lost a lot of trust and faith in the financial institutions. They are pretty much playing fast and loose with the people they are meant to protect," she said.
"We stand up for ourselves. One thing about Baltimore is that we are not afraid of a fight. There are too many needs we have in this city."
But this case looks set to put all others in the shade. Policymakers around the world are calling for an overhaul of the Libor system, which underpins $500trn of contracts globally - everything from home loans to arcane derivatives.
Stephen Bainbridge, a professor of law at the University of California, said the case was "one of the worst examples of abuse of trust that I can remember in 25 years of following corporate governance". Given the scale of Libor's influence, he said this could emerge as "the defining financial scandal of the meltdown".
Bainbridge believes the US justice department may build an anti-trust case against those involved that could ultimately lead to a settlement as large as that agreed in the US's massive suit against the tobacco industry. Anti-trust laws allow damages to be tripled for those convicted of collusion.
But he believes a suit such as Baltimore's may be harder to prove. The city's lawyers will have to prove direct "loss causation" - that bankers fixing rates in London directly hit Baltimore's account balance. "Proving that chain of events can be difficult," said Bainbridge.
Baltimore city solicitor George Nilson, however, said he was confident there was a good case to answer. He pointed out that the process of discovery - when the city gets hold of internal emails and documents from the bank - had not even started yet.
Nilson said his one fear was that just as some banks were too big to fail, this could be a case that was "too big to try".
Captions:
Stephanie Rawlings-Blake said services in Baltimore had closed because of the Libor scandal Photograph: Gail Burton/AP
LOAD-DATE: July 19, 2012.
(as an aside, I am sure the good folks over at Birmingham Alabama also have their sites fixated on our Libor crooks)
end
Yesterday, an Italian prosecutor is setting his eyes on the Euribor fixing:
(courtesy Dow Jones international news) and special thanks to Don Jack for providing this to me
HEADLINE: Italian Prosecutor Said to Open Probe Into Euribor Fixing
BODY:
ROME--An Italian court has begun a probe into possible manipulation of the Euribor, a benchmark interest rate for an array of financial products, two Italian consumer lobbies said Friday.
Michele Ruggiero, a prosecutor in the southern town of Trani, has opened a criminal probe into potential market-rigging and fraud through manipulation of the Euribor rate, Federconsumatori said on its website.
Federconsumatori and Adusbef recently filed a complaint to the Trani court. Adusbef, another consumer rights lobby, said Italian mortgage holders had suffered at least 3 billion euros ($3.7 billion) in losses due to manipulation of the Euribor rate.
Mr. Ruggiero has ordered Italy's tax police to gather relevant documents and has set up a team of experts to conduct the probe, Federconsumatori said.
Mr. Ruggiero is also leading a criminal probe into alleged misconduct by major rating agencies, all of which have downgraded Italy's sovereign credit rating in the past year.
Write to Christopher Emsden at chris.emsden@dowjones.com
Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires [ 20-07-12 0914GMT ]
NOTES:
PUBLISHER: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
LOAD-DATE: July 20, 2012
end
Now, Wall Street is set to attack its own as those who did not set the rates attack their fellow brethren.
(courtesy Ed Steer and Bloomberg)
Feeding Frenzy Seen If Wall Street Sues Itself Over Libor
Wall Street, grappling with mounting regulatory probes and investor claims over alleged interest-rate manipulation, may face yet another formidable foe: Itself.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley are among financial firms that may bring lawsuits against their biggest rivals as regulators on three continents examine whether other banks manipulated the London interbank offered rate, known as Libor, said Bradley Hintz, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. Even if Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley forgo claims on their own behalf, they oversee money-market funds that may be required to pursue restitution for injured clients, he said.
Because Libor is based on submissions from only some of the world’s largest banks, the probes threaten to pit firms uninvolved in setting the rate against any implicated in its manipulation, Hintz said. Libor serves as a benchmark for at least $360 trillion in securities.
Yes, it will certainly be interesting to watch this all unfold. This Bloomberg offering was posted on their website late yesterday afternoon...and I thank West Virginia reader Elliot Simon for bringing it to our attention. It's certainly worth reading...and the link is here.
end
There is another big Financial times article for you to red written by Patrick Jenkins and Caroline Binham of Bloomberg. It was published in the London Financial times where it was reported that the UK's FSA is stepping up its probe on the Libor scandal.
It seems that the key player is Barclay's Philip Moryoussef who was the centre of things as he received and manipulated the rates basically from the Singapore hub. The article suggests that the 3 other kingpins that we identified for you on Thursday were:
i) Michael Zrihen of Credit Agricole. he has been removed from trading by his new employer.
ii) Didier Sander of HSBC iii) Christian Bittar of Deutsche Bank.
you will recall that Deutsche Bank turned in state's evidence so that they are basically immune to prosecution.
I have the article and I will try to copy and paste this important article for you onto my commentary today.
end
The rats are fleeing a sinking ship!!
(courtesy zero hedge)
Scandal At The IMF: Senior Economist Resigns, Says "Ashamed To Have Had Any Association With Fund At All"
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 14:58 -0400
The rats everywhere are now jumping furiously off the titanic, but few had taken the time to write a letter explaining in detail just how broken the Titanic was just as it was sinking This has now changed, with the departure of Peter Doyle, formerly a division chief in the IMF’s European Department responsible for non-crisis countries and currently an adviser to the Fund. Not content with quietly slinking off the scandal ridden organization which has become the butt of all jokes in the international community, where humor about Lagarde's Louis Vuitton panhandling bag is as pervasive as punchlines about just how incompetent the organization is at actually doing its duty, Doyle has penned the following scathing letter which tears down every myth about the IMF: from its impartiality, to the selection process of its head, to its effectiveness. The letter also contains the following gem: "After twenty years of service, I am ashamed to have had any association with the Fund at all." Pretty much says it all. This is a scandal in the making, and one which may shake to the core the credibility of the IMF in the context of international organization.
Full letter (pdf)
European Department
Washington DC
June 18, 2012
To Mr. Shaalan, Dean of the IMF Executive Board
Today, I addressed the Executive Board for the last time—because I am leaving the Fund.
Accordingly, I wanted first to formally express my deep appreciation to the Swedish, Israeli, and Danish authorities with whom I have worked recently, as well as all others with whom I have worked earlier, for their extraordinary generosity towards me personally.
But I also wanted to take this opportunity to explain my departure.
After twenty years of service, I am ashamed to have had any association with the Fund at all.
This is not solely because of the incompetence that was partly chronicled by the OIA report into the global crisis and the TSR report on surveillance ahead of the Euro Area crisis. More so, it is because the substantive difficulties in these crises, as with others, were identified well in advance but were suppressed here. Given long gestation periods and protracted international decision-making processes to head off both these global challenges, timely sustained warnings were of the essence. So the failure of the Fund to issue them is a failing of the first order, even if such warnings may not have been heeded. The consequences include suffering (and risk of worse to come) for many including Greece, that the second global reserve currency is on the brink, and that the Fund for the past two years has been playing catch-up and reactive roles in the last-ditch efforts to save it.
Further, the proximate factors which produced these failings of IMF surveillance—analytical risk aversion, bilateral priority, and European bias—are, if anything, becoming more deeply entrenched, notwithstanding initiatives which purport to address them. This fact is most clear in regard to appointments for Managing Director which, over the past decade, have all-too-evidently been disastrous. Even the current incumbent is tainted, as neither her gender, integrity, or élan can make up for the fundamental illegitimacy of the selection process. In a hierarchical place like this, the implications of those choices filter directly to others in senior management, and via the appointments, fixed term contracts, and succession planning of senior staff, they go on to infuse the organization as a whole, overwhelming everything else. A handicapped Fund, subject to those proximate roots of surveillance failure, is what the Executive Board prefers. Would that I had understood twenty years ago that this would be the choice.
There are good salty people here. But this one is moving on. You might want to take care not to lose the others.
cc. Ms. Nemat Shafik
Mr. Stanley Fischer
Mr. Stephan Ingves
Mr. Benny Andersen
Mr. Alex Gibbs
Mr. Eric Meyer
Mr. Amit Friedman
Mr. Martin Holmberg
Mr. Reza Moghadam
Mr. Mark Plant
Mr. Brad McDonald
end
I will leave you today with this offering from Wolf Richter on the hopeless plight of Southern Europe:
(courtesy Wolf Richter)
“Southern Europe Does Almost Nothing—Except Complain”
Submitted by testosteronepit on 07/20/2012 19:55 -0400
- Bulgaria
- default
- Eastern Europe
- European Central Bank
- Eurozone
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
- International Monetary Fund
- National Debt
- Recession
- Reserve Currency
- Unemployment
- World Bank
Wolf Richter www.testosteronepit.com
“While Eastern Europe is largely implementing the necessary reforms, Southern Europe does almost nothing—except complain,” said Bulgarian Finance Minister Simeon Djankov in aninterview, a withering blast aimed at neighboring Greece.
And in Greece, “The risk of bankruptcy is still existent,” saidFotis Kouvelis, the leader of Democratic Left, smallest of the three parties in the coalition government. His way of reminding the bailout Troika—the EU, the European Central Bank (ECB), and the IMF—to open the money spigot all the way, or else! The Troika inspectors are scheduled to return to Athens next week to have another look [read.... Greece Flails About, Troika Inspectors Paint “Awful Picture,” Merkel Draws A Line, German Industry & Voters Back Her: It’s Almost Over For Greece].
In September, armed with the inspectors’ final report, the Troika will decide whether or not to make the next bailout payment to Greece. If the decision is no, Greece will default and most likely return to the drachma.
“We demand an extension,” Kouvelis said, summarizing eloquently the strategy since the June elections. Instead of implementing with fiendish dedication the reforms that the prior government had agreed to in exchange for the second bailout package, the new government insists on renegotiating those reforms and then delaying those renegotiated reforms, while insisting on the continuous flow of other people’s billions. He complained about the recession, and that therefore structural reforms couldn’t be implemented.
But neighboring Bulgaria is one of the EU’s fastest growing economies. It has the second lowest national debt of all EU countries and even sports a budget surplus. Individual and corporate income tax rates are 10%. And it’s one of only three EU countries in compliance with the financial stability criteria in the Maastricht treaty. The very criteria that were supposed to have prevented the debt crisis ravaging the Eurozone. So the fiscal union treaty, pushed through by Chancellor Angela Merkel but hung up in the German Constitutional Court, is supposed to accomplish the same thing that the Maastricht treaty already failed to accomplish: force countries to obey limits on deficits and debt.
But Bulgaria has been in compliance, in part due to Djankov, who became Finance Minister in 2009, after a 14-year stint at the World Bank. When asked if his country, still one of the poorest in the EU, wasn’t balancing its budget at the expense of the people, he said: “That is a false and dangerous contradiction that the Southern Europeans recently added to the debate. Countries like Germany, Finland, or also Bulgaria have growing economies and still adhere to the deficit rules. Balanced budgets and growth are not a contradiction. Prerequisite is that the necessary reforms are implemented.”
Spain has been trying to do that. But people resist. With unemployment at 24.4%, their government on the brink of financial doom, and their banks collapsing, Spaniards have turned to protests. Yesterday, firefighters were on the forefront. While some battled the police, others protested tongue in cheek, and with a good laugh, making their point with perfect visual clarity—and with a lot of bare skin. Read.... Naked Firefighters Protest Salary Cuts (VIDEO - they use their hands or helmets to cover up their equipment).
And in Greece, reforms just aren’t implemented. Even the privatization of bloated state-owned enterprises is bogged down. 28 projects by 2015: electricity provider DEI, the postal service, airports, railroads, ports, hospitals.... For €19 billion, an amount that keeps shrinking. But this year, only two projects are on the list: the national lottery and the former International Center of the Olympic Press, a mere building.
And so, Costas Mitropoulos, the frustrated CEO of the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund, which was put in place a year ago to implement the privatizations, resigned. “The newly elected government has not given the support needed,” Mitropoulos wrote in his letter of resignation. “Instead, they have indirectly yet systematically reduced the prestige and credibility in the eyes of potential investors.”
And the argument that Bulgaria has an advantage over Greece because it has its own currency doesn’t hold water. After losing value at an exponential rate, the lev was pegged to the Deutsche Mark in 1999 at 1:1 and then to the euro at the DM’s conversion rate. And the peg has held! Alas, Bulgaria was scheduled to adopt the euro by January 1, 2012. A deadline that came and went. So was Djankov hesitating to adopt the euro? “Hesitating?” he said. “More than that. We put the process on ice. We first want to see what the future rules of the Eurozone look like.”
If it sticks around. In December 2001, when I was in Germany on business, bank showcases were filled with feel-good euro agitprop. Euros would enter circulation on January 1, and this was part of the campaign to persuade Germans to surrender their Deutsche Marks. Some were apprehensive, but my business contacts were gleeful: the euro would become the dominant reserve currency, and oil would be priced in it! Read....Now Even Counterfeiters Are Giving up on the Euro.
I wish you all to have a grand weekend. I will catch up with you Monday night.
all the best
Harvey
1. Central Fund of Canada: traded to a positive 2.1percent to NAV in usa funds and a positive 2.4% to NAV for Cdn funds. ( July 21-.2012)
2. Sprott silver fund (PSLV): Premium to NAV rose to 3.26% to NAV July 21 2012 :
3. Sprott gold fund (PHYS): premium to NAV rose to 2.91% positive to NAV July 19.2012). .
Finally, we are now starting to see premiums return to the Sprott silver fund. No doubt, in 3 to 4 weeks we will be back to previous premium levels as inventories around the world deplete in silver. The fact that Sprott removed 250 million dollars worth of silver is a dagger to our bankers.
end
Gold COT Report - Futures
Large Speculators
Commercial
Total
Long
Short
Spreading
Long
Short
Long
Short
180,474
51,515
32,493
162,570
321,389
375,537
405,397
Change from Prior Reporting Period
-1,682
-4,406
2,261
-829
5,224
-250
3,079
Traders
151
64
80
46
42
231
165
Small Speculators
Long
Short
Open Interest
55,780
25,920
431,317
1,713
-1,616
1,463
non reportable positions
Change from the previous reporting period
COT Gold Report - Positions as of
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
In our Gold COT report:
Our large speculators:
Those large speculators that have been long in gold pitched 1682 contracts from their long side.
Those large speculators that have been short in gold covered a rather large 4406 contracts.
Our commercials:
Those commercials that have been long in gold pitched a very small 829 contracts.
Those commercials that have been short in gold added a very large 5224 contracts to their short side.
Our small specs:
Those small specs that have been long in gold added another 1713 contracts to their long side
Those small specs that have been short in gold covered 1616 contracts from their short side.
Conclusion:
slightly more bearish and thus an explanation as to why the bankers were trying to whack gold on Wednesday, Thursday and yesterday but failed.
Silver COT Report: Futures
Large Speculators
Commercial
Long
Short
Spreading
Long
Short
28,431
20,775
24,156
48,214
63,349
-3
1,123
-2,128
-157
871
Traders
58
47
46
38
34
Small Speculators
Open Interest
Total
Long
Short
121,819
Long
Short
21,018
13,539
100,801
108,280
-2
-2,156
-2,290
-2,288
-134
non reportable positions
Positions as of:
123
107
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
© SilverSeek.com
And now for our silver COT:
It seems that the players have vacated the silver arena:
Those large specs that have been long in silver pitched a minuscule 3 contracts from their long side.
Those large specs that have been short in silver added a tiny 1123 contracts to their short side.
Those commercials that are long in silver and close to the physical scene pitched a tiny 157 contracts from their long side.
Those commercials that have been perennially short in silver and subject to the silver CFTC probe, added another 871 contracts to their short side.
Small specs:
Those small specs that have long in silver pitched a very tiny 2 contracts from their long side.
Those small specs that have been short in silver covered 2156 contracts from their short side.
Conclusion:
it looks like the rats are leaving the ship!!
The following is a review of gold trading Thursday night from Europe and Asia with commentaries
from Goldcore.
(courtesy Goldcore)
Gold Q2, 2012 - Investment Statistics And Commentary
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 12:09 -0400
- Bridgewater
- British Pound
- Budget Deficit
- China
- Debt Ceiling
- Dubai
- Eurozone
- Global Economy
- Hong Kong
- India
- International Monetary Fund
- Monetary Policy
- Precious Metals
- Recession
- Reuters
- Ron Paul
- Swiss Franc
- Twitter
- United Kingdom
- Volatility
- World Gold Council
- Yen
Submitted by GoldCore
Gold Q2, 2012 - Investment Statistics And Commentary
Today's AM fix was USD 1,583.00, EUR 1,291.30, and GBP 1,007.83 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,580.00, EUR 1,287.06 and GBP 1,009.33 per ounce.
Silver is trading at $27.07/oz, €22.22/oz and £17.32/oz. Platinum is trading at $1,418.25/oz, palladium at $577.80/oz and rhodium at $1,190/oz.
Gold rose $3.70 or 0.23% in New York yesterday and closed at $1,581.00/oz. It rose as high as $1,590/oz prior to determined selling which saw gold fall. Gold ticked higher in Asia prior to falling soon after the European open.
Gold has been trading in a range between $1,530/oz and $1,630/oz for nearly 2 months despite the Eurozone debt crisis entering its 3rd year and looking set to escalate and despite signs that the US economy is on the verge of a sharp recession.
These two factors alone mean that gold will likely resume its upward march due to continuing safe haven demand. The likelihood of further QE from the Fed will be icing on the cake for gold and silver.
US data yesterday showed factory activity shrunk in July for a 3rd consecutive month and the jobless claims rose last week.
Those who continue to put “lipstick on the pig” that is the US economy are lulling themselves and other unfortunates into another false sense of security.
“Blue skies thinking” regarding individual economies and the global economy got us into this mess and it will not get us out.
The World Gold Council have just published their commentary on gold’s price performance in various currencies, its volatility statistics and correlation to other assets in the quarter -
It provides macroeconomic context to the investment statistics published at the end of each quarter and highlights emerging themes relevant to gold’s future development.
One of their key findings is that gold will act as hedge against possible coming dollar weakness and gold will act as a "currency hedge in the international monetary system."
Key findings of the World Gold Council’s report:
Review: Key Macroeconomic Themes During Q2 2012
Gold prices declined in most currencies during the second quarter with the exception of the euro, Swiss franc and Indian rupee, in part due to a strong US dollar. Despite a 3.8% decline in Q2 to US$1,598.50/oz on the London PM fix, gold was up 4.4% during the first half of the year. Volatility remained elevated amidst a busy event-risk period. However, gold generally outperformed risk assets.
Global inflation eases but underlying trends supportive for gold: A substantial drop in energy and some agricultural commodities during the period has eased inflation pressures in many parts of the world and put downward pressure on gold prices.
Reassessing “risk-free” assets: Even assets traditionally considered safe are under pressure. German Bunds interest rates climbed in June. The Swiss franc, yen and US Treasuries are also facing issues – challenging their role as assets of last resort. Despite pressures on the price of gold, its lack of credit risk, its liquidity and hedging characteristics has made gold an attractive vehicle for long-term wealth preservation.
Correlation between gold and risk assets approaches long-term averages: Gold’s correlation to equities and other risk assets fell towards long-run average levels in Q2 helping portfolio diversification. Gold’s increased correlation to equities in Q1 was an indirect effect related to a weaker global economy coupled with a stronger US dollar.
Outlook: Emerging Macroeconomic Themes In H2 2012
Deflationary concerns in some countries provide room for further fiscal and monetary stimulus. This may lead to a further debasement of currencies through unconventional monetary policy and an increased risk of future inflation. These factors should provide support for future gold investment.
The underlying structural issues that affect the euro zone remain unresolved, despite advances in the formation of more comprehensive burden-sharing mechanisms. In such an environment of uncertainty and higher market volatility, gold will continue to be an asset that investors use to diversify risk and preserve capital.
The flight to the US dollar as a safe-haven in the first half of 2012 could be reversed. The US debt ceiling debate in Q3 and federal elections in November, followed by the necessity to confront a US$1.3tn budget deficit will prove challenging to the US dollar. With most currencies under pressure in one form or another, gold is likely to provide a hedging mechanism for investors
Dr. Constantin Gurdgiev, a non Executive member of theGoldCore Investment Committee, has analysed the Q2, 2012 World Gold Council data and has written a blog post that can be read here or see commentary.
He finds that the report is worth a read as it shows how gold generally outperformed risk assets and helped portfolio diversification.
He warns that safe haven government debt markets have all the hallmarks of “return-free risks” rather than “risk-free returns.”
The World Gold Council’s ‘Quarterly statistics commentary Q2 2012’ can be read here.
(Bloomberg) -- China Plans to Start Interbank Gold Trading on Local Market
China is preparing to introduce an interbank gold-trading system, a move that may enable domestic banks to treat the precious metal as a more liquid asset and increase holdings.
The Shanghai Gold Exchange, the country’s biggest spot market, has been working with the China Foreign Exchange Trade System since the start of the year, Gu Wenshuo, an exchange spokesman, said today. The original plan was for the new system to be running at the end of August, Gu said by phone, adding that details are unavailable as banks are giving feedback.
China has been the largest producer since 2007, and was the biggest user after India last year. An interbank gold-trading system is part of broader reforms that Beijing aims to introduce to make the financial sector more market-driven, according to Jiang Shu, a senior analyst at Industrial Bank Co. Ltd.
“China is already very important in terms of gold production and consumption,” said Jeffrey Rhodes, global head of precious metals in Dubai at INTL FCStone Inc., a New York- based trading and brokerage firm. “If a new interbank market really does flourish, it could put the Chinese market in the mainstream and become world-class.”
Spot gold was 0.2 percent higher at $1,584.65 an ounce at 3:38 p.m. in Shanghai. The metal, which reached a record $1,921.15 in September, has rallied for 11 years on emerging- market and investment demand, as well as central-bank purchases.
Gold imports by mainland China from Hong Kong reached 314,810 kilograms in the first five months, compared with 39,607.4 kilograms a year ago, according to Bloomberg calculations based on data from the Hong Kong government.
For breaking news and commentary on financial markets and gold, follow us on Twitter.
NEWS
Gold steady on weak U.S. data; dollar weighs – Reuters
Gold advances for second day - MarketWatch
UK housing slump will deepen, warns IMF – The Telegraph
COMMENTARY
Dr Gurdgiev: Q2 Report From The World Gold Council – True Economics
China’s Coming Assault on the Western Financial System – The Daily Reckoning
World economy now effectively a multitrillion-dollar game of chicken – Resource Clips
LBMA's gold price fixing scheme about to collapse, London trader tells KWN
Submitted by cpowell on Fri, 2012-07-20 19:07. Section: Daily Dispatches
3p ET Friday, July 20, 2012
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
The London trader source of King World News reports today that the nakedness of unallocated and even some supposedly allocated positions in the London bullion market now is being discussed openly and he expects defaults resulting in cash settlement as the prices of gold and silver vault higher. He adds that demand from China is steady and that China has accumulated far more metal than is being reported. An excerpt from the interview is headlined "The LBMA Gold Price Fixing Scheme Is Over" and it's posted at the King World News blog here:
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
end
Jim Sinclair launches operation: Investor's Spring Freedom against our crooked bankers.
He urges us to approach mining CEO's and tell them our concerns at what the big bankers are doing to our economy:
Investor’s Spring–Freedom!
My Dear Extended Family,
Investor’s Spring. Freedom at last!
You know that I have spent a good part of my life in an attempt to better understand the human experience looking for purpose. I would like to share with you a short conversation I had with Sai Baba in India in 1986. He said to me "What would you do if I made you a warrior?" The room was full of spiritually liberal people. I answered "make great war." There was a collective gasp by the attendees. Sai Baba said, "Right Answer, Sinclair."
Nobody wants war, but if it comes your way, and is your duty to pursue, it must be done, and done well. This war has been brought to us by those that would profit by destruction in clear violation of common commercial code.
These demons do not just short a situations based on a premise and await profit.
They pound mercilessly on the bids, seeking to depress the price.
They sell short the shares index and other funds buy as a means to get large numbers.
They immediately start dirty tricks.
They turn you in to regulatory bodies in the area of your trading and in the country of your operation on constructed nonsense.
They seek authors to write negative articles from their imagination to insult your integrity as a company not only where you work, but also where you trade.
They pay people to adopt a multitude of nicknames to post horrific lies about you personally and your company on chat boards.
They have a trading campaign to sell every instance of good news you have.
They have a trading campaign to sell your positive closes within the last 30 seconds of the trading day.
They enter orders with brokers who know what they want to happen in sizes larger than the total average daily trading to sell at the market on the close of Fridays.
They trade other exchange listed shares on the NASDAQ out of line with the listed close to skew the closing prices to the negative.
They actually paint the charts with their trading to make your situation less attractive technically.
These are only a few of the standard dirty tricks they execute in order to profit from these illegal acts to profit from the short which is the fruit of their crimes.
Their offense is violation of common commercial code. The short is simply the means of illicit profits. I do not intend to preach to you, but rather lead by example.
Your job is to get the attention first of those that are the management and directors of the companies you invest in that have been manipulated. You may have to be strong in order to accomplish this.
I am obligated in my corporate position to defend the company to the limit of my ability. I am obligated to say no, not on my watch. I am obligated to use all means, including litigation, to protect capital value on behalf of the investors. If I failed to do that I would be liable to you. This is true of every investment you have, not only precious metals shares.
Step one of "Investor’s Spring, Freedom" is to raise hell with the management and directors of your investments to take action to protect your interests from illegal and unethical activities. Tell them remedy exists in common commercial code moreso than securities laws.
I will let you know what I am doing as I do it. I will lead other companies to protect you by example.
It is up to you to do one simple thing. Wake up this bunch of brain dead office decorations, professional campers and rock hounds and get them to follow me in my march forward.
Respectfully,
Jim
end
Our friends over at the Silverdoctors.com web site has released the audio of the interview with Bill Murphy of GATA with respect to his London source. As a reminder, this London trader's views on what will happen have been 100% accurate over these past several years. The London trader believes that silver will explode in August.
Will it be because of the CFTC ruling that will be coming? Do not know, but something big is going to happen.
Listen...
10,276
end
Overnight in Europe we witnessed the risk is off trade with all Asian and European bourses in the red. The Euro/USA cross proceeded south and at 8 am est was trading at 1.2234. All eyes were on Spain with respect to the terms of what it will receive for its banking rescue. If you will recall, 30 billion euros was to come by the end of July. Markets were waiting for official news on this and on new terms. Loans will be forthcoming once stress tests on the banks in question commence.
The 10 yr Spanish bond yield again traded wider at 7.11%, with the Italian 10 year bond yield rising above the 6% level trading at 6.10%
(your overnight sentiment from Europe, courtesy zero hedge 8.am est Friday morning)
Overnight Sentiment: Europe Threatens Market Surreality Again
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 07:08 -0400
It is a quiet session so far with risk in the Off position (for now - we have yet to see the sinusoid HFT stop triggering function which rises stocks artificially as yesterday demonstrated so very well to nobody's surprise). All eyes are once again focusing to Europe, pushing the EURUSD lower for at least a few more hours until Europe closes and the repatriation resumes. In terms of key European events, today is the EU finance minister’s conference call on Spain today. As DB summarizes, officials are expected to approve the EU100 billion Spanish bank rescue plan however the exact size of the loan will probably only be determined in September pending the result of a bank-by-bank stress test. This will then pave way for restructuring plans for the sector in October which is broadly consistent with the timeline set out in the leaked draft MoU. At the previous meeting finance ministers agreed to first disburse EU30bn to Spain by the end of July so we will watch out for further confirmation of this today. We may also get the terms of the loan today. The conference call is expected to start at 10am GMT. What is odd is that unlike before when the mere possibility of a European catalyst was enough to push risk higher, this is no longer the case, and Spanish spreads to Bunds just hit another all time wide, with the Spanish 10 Year plunging to 7.11%, another post-summit high, this time dragging the Italian 10 Year which was at 6.10% at last check. And as explained before, the European uber pair trade means that as PIIGS yields soar, the core drops to new record, in most cases, negative nominal lows.
Will the world once again be able to ignore the once-again imploding European reality (and American: Of the 35 S&P 500 firms that reported results yesterday, about 74% of those came ahead of market consensus but only 57% of those topped sales forecasts.), and send the ES to a green close on the day? Or is today the day when reality comes back with a vengeance? Stay tuned and find out.
end
Opening Spanish 10 yr yield at 8 am est:
SPANISH GOVERNMENT GENERIC BONDS - 10 YR NOTE
Add to Portfolio
GSPG10YR:IND
7.100000.08900 1.27%
Your opening Italian 10 yr bond yield: (8 am est)
Italy Govt Bonds 10 Year Gross Yield
Add to Portfolio
GBTPGR10:IND
6.066000.06500 1.08%
As of 07:40:00 ET on 07/20/2012.
end
In the following video, Stratfor's Adrian Bosoni highlights the fundamental contradictions and the major flaw in the European financial crisis. We see that ECB board member Asmussen, and German minister Schaeuble both steadfastly state that there will be no money transfer without a sovereignty (fiscal) transfer. Bosoni states correctly that this is the proper way to proceed on a long term basis in order to have a robust and unified budgetary regime. The flaw: the length of time to ratify this. Spain, Portugal, and Greece all have very short time horizons due to their massive problems and all have asked for a delay in implementing a balancing of their budgetary deficits. In other words, the PIIGS nations are asking for continual bailouts with the hope that they will get their act together.
the video is a must see as it gives a terrific review of the problems facing Spain and other PIIGS nations. This was released a few hours before the Valencia announcement.The video is 3 1/2 minutes.
(courtesy, Bosoni/Stratfor/zero hedge)
Europe's Fundamental Flaw Resurfaces
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/19/2012 19:54 -0400
"Two weeks after a summit that promised to bring solutions to the European financial crisis, the European Union has once again revealed its fundamental contradictions" is how Stratfor's Adrian Bosoni introduces a succinct clip on the reality the European leaders faced once they arrived home after that strenuous weekend of blithering. Between Asmussen and Schaeuble who have steadfastly stuck to the no-monetary-transfer-without-sovereign-transfer tack - which actually make a fair amount of sense on a long-term basis - a robust and unified budgetary regime is precisely what Europe has lacked. Unfortunately, Bosoni notes, "even in a best case scenario this could not be achieved before 2015" thanks to treaties, referenda, and ratifications. In a little over 3 minutes, the analyst outlines exactly what is holding it back and why the short-term is all they have as budgetary discipline is proving particularly difficult for the EU members to maintain (see more Spanish riots tonight). Between Spain's delays in meeting targets, Greece's 'impossible' budgetary goals, Ireland's demands for concessions, and Finland's collateral agreement with Spain, unifying anything over there seems impractical and impossible.
A must watch for the quickest summary of the state of Europe - and the best explanation of the reality to which European credit markets are cracking as opposed to the nominal price of global equities leaking higher...
Valencia Announces SOS, Needs To Tap Government LIquidity Support Just Eurogroup Accepts Spanish Bailout Plan
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 07:58 -0400
Just as today's largely expected announcement that the Eurogroup has formally agreed to accept the Spanish bail out (details still lacking), the Spanish region of Valencia just became the second to officially demand a bailout following Catalunya's comparable announcement at the end of May, and has announced it will need to tap the government liquidity mechanism. Kneejerk reaction: EURUSD sharply lower and below 1.22 for the first time in days.
From Reuters:
Spain's heavily indebted eastern region of Valencia said on Friday it would apply for help under the government's 18 billion euro plan passed on Thursday aimed at helping regional finances.
The plan comes with strict conditionality that a region stick to its deficit cutting plans.
Concurrent with this announcement, Spain also announced an update to its deficit projections, whose details are meaningless as they will be revised adversely shortly, which confirmed that the Spanish economy continues to deteriorate at an accelerating pace.
Spanish Stocks Plunge Most In 12 Months As Egan-Jones Cuts Spain To CC+
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 10:50 -0400
With IBEX down 6%, 10Y yields over 7.30%, 10Y spread over 610bps, and EURJPY at 12 year lows; the hits just keep coming. From Ega-Jones:
Slipping - Spain's 10 year debt is now yielding 7.18%, which is a reflection of the weakening of the economy and the credit quality of Spain. In addition to the expected austerity riots, the latest news is that Valencia and other regions will need $15B of aid, the sen. debtholders of the weak banks will be forced to take losses, and there might be some sharing of losses among all banks. An estimated decline in GDP of 1.7% (per the Economy Ministry), the 25% unemployment, the IIF's recent estimate of addl bank loan losses up to EUR260B, and possible depositor withdrawals hurt. From 2008 to 2011, Spain's debt mushroomed from EUR436B to EUR735B while its GDP declined from EUR1.09T to EUR1.07T. Social benefits are a major problem; while pmts to the govt have been more or less flat over the past four years (up EUR 3B), payments from the government have been up EUR 45B. As a result, Spain is short about EUR50B per year for social payments, EUR20B per year for interest, and an additional EUR 20B for asset growth; hence the EUR90B per annum increase in debt.
Spain will inevitably be faced with addl pmts to support a portion its banking sector and for its weaker provinces. Assets of Spain's largest two banks exceed its GDP. We are slipping our rating to "CC+"; watch for more requests for support from the banks and money creation.
via Bloomberg.
Europe Ends In A Sea Of Red
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 11:47 -0400
Spain's broad equity index suffered its second largest single-day drop in almost 4 years and Italy also tumbled almost 5% as everything European was sold hard. EuroStoxx (the broad Dow equivalent) is down almost 3% as EURUSD dropped to two year lows, EURJPY to 12 year lows. AAA safe havens were massively bid with Germany, Denmark, and Switzerland all to new low (negative) rate closes. Core equity markets did suffer though with Germany down 2% but it was the periphery that saw the damage in credit-land with Spain 10Y closing at 7.27%, 610bps over Bunds (and 5Y CDS over 605bps). Spanish spreads are +130bps from post-Summit (and pre-Summit) and Italy +78bps, but it is the front-end of the curve that is most worrisome - Spain's 2Y is 132bps wider in the last week. Europe's VIX exploded by over 4 vols to 24%today and once again looks decidedly high relative to US VIX.
Spain and Italy surging to as bad a performance as Portugal...post Summit...
but it is the front-end that is a disaster! This is where all the LTRO debt is being held that was put on as part of the Sarkozy carry trade - ECB margin calls here we come!!
but while this is apples to apple-like things comparisons, the difference between credit and equity market reactions post Summit remain remarkable...(though today saw a pretty decent turnaround)...
and broadly European stocks were hammered today as hope fades...
charts: Bloomberg
end
From the USA side of things, Bruce Krasting weighs in on Schumer's choice of words to Bernanke this week: " get to work, Mr Bernanke"
The Fed will have another FOMB meeting on August 1.
It is there that they will decide on the following;
1. Do nothing
ii) Extend ZIRP to 2014
iii) Announce another QEIII of say 250- 600 billion dollars
iv) Cut the deposit rate from 1/4% to 1/8%
Krasting believes it will be the latter and he gives his reasons why.
Also the consequences of that action.
(a must read)
Bernanke - Post Schumer Gaffe
Submitted by Bruce Krasting on 07/20/2012 08:59 -0400
- Ben Bernanke
- Bond
- China
- Copper
- CRAP
- European Central Bank
- Fail
- Finland
- Germany
- India
- Monetary Policy
- Ron Paul
- Switzerland
- Yield Curve
I'm adding myself to the long list of folks who have commented on NY Senator Chuck Schumer's choice of words to Bernanke the other day:
.
.
.
Schumer is a political hack. He wants the Fed to do ‘something’ today that would give the economy a lift heading into the election. Chuck knows that the Legislative side can’t/won’t do a thing before November, so he begs Ben to light another monetary fire to help the Democratic cause. Chucky boy is an ass.
I doubt that Bernanke listens to the noise from Senators very often, but Chuck’s words got a lot of press. I'm wondering what Ben is thinking. Schumer has brought politics into the outcome of the August 1st Fed meeting. Whatever Ben decides to do, he will be accused of partisan politics.
There are many scenarios for the August Fed meeting:
.
I) Do nothing
.
Arguments For:
a) The economy stinks, but it is not in a crisis. More “crisis monetary measures” are not justified.
b) With the 10-year already at 1.5%, the Fed can’t accomplish anything by pushing rates a few basis points lower.
Arguments Against:
The election and related political considerations will absolutely tie the Feds hands after the August meeting. The next chance for the Fed to “do something” will be in late November. If Bernanke wants to buy some insurance, he has to do something in August.
.
II) Extend the ZIRP language past 2014
.
Arguments For:
I can’t think of any.
Arguments Against.
Because there is no substance to this, there is a very strong likely hood that the markets will take a few seconds, and then puke. Bernanke knows this. He doesn’t want to lay an egg.
.
III) QE3 – $600B LSAP targeted to Agency Mortgage Bonds
.
Arguments For:
a) This is what the market wants to see. Failure to do QE3 will disappoint, Ben does not want to disappoint.
b) This a is “populist” approach. Ben can say that he is doing his best to allow homeowners to ReFi and prospective buyers to get a record low rate.
Arguments Against:
a) This is an “all in bet”. Even Bernanke has been questioning the efficacy of additional QE of late.
b) Senator Shelby and Speaker Boehner will say, “The Fed is printing money to play politics!”
c) Bernanke’s critics will go wild.
d) There is absolutely no certainty that another big LSAP will do a damn thing.
.
IV) QE3 - $250B LSAP targeted to Agency Mortgage Bonds
Arguments For:
A small QE would create less political backlash. Ben could argue that he is being “moderate” and will, as always, be willing to do more if this modest monetary “bump” proves to be inadequate.
Arguments Against:
a) A “half a loaf” is going to fail miserably. Bernanke wants monetary policy to jack up stocks, as he thinks this creates jobs. Stocks would nose dive if this is the result. Bernanke understands this.
b) Both Blues and Reds would be upset. Schumer will be pointing at Bernanke and saying, “He didn’t do his job!” At the same time Ron Paul would be calling for Ben’s head on a platter.
.
V) Something Else – A cut in the deposit rate from a 1/4% to a 1/8%
.
Arguments For:
a) This appears to be a modest step. As such, it would be less susceptible to criticism.
b) The small change in the deposit rate would achieve something that Bernanke has been shooting for a long time.Returns on short-term money would go negative. Three and Six month Bills would certainly be negative. One-year paper would trade around flat.
c) Germany and Switzerland are already in negative territory. Other, smaller bond markets like Finland and Sweden are also in the red. For the US to follow suit would not be that big a surprise. Bernanke could blunt critics by saying he had done less than Europe - an 1/8th in the US versus 0% for the ECB.
d) The change to negative yields, (regardless of how small), will force money to move around. There are trillions in money market funds, Trillions in short term Treasury paper, and trillions more on corporate balance sheets. All of this is now going to be looking at negative returns.
e) With the first rungs of the yield curve in the bucket, the longer maturities would be dragged down. The Ten-year would move toward 1%. This result would be similar to the (hoped for) outcome of a large LSAP.
f) Bernanke could still say, “The Fed has more it could do”, as the deposit rate could be cut again (to zero) at some point.
.
Of these options, I believe that #V has the greatest probability of occurring.
I hope that the Fed sits tight, and does nothing. But that seems unlikely. Bernanke knows that the economy is now decelerating, and that his hands get tied after the August meeting. So“something” is more likely than “nothing”.
It’s hard to predict what might happen if Ben pushes rates into negative territory. It could end up resulting in an orderly market transition from cash, to high-risk securities like stocks and junk bonds. The virtuous cycle of higher stocks leading to higher spending and more jobs might be the result. But I doubt it.
Arguments Against:
a) The knee jerk reaction to negative rates might be positive, but in a short period of time the market will come to realize that negative rates are not going to force people (more) into dividend stocks. Quite the opposite, it will scare the crap out of them.
b) This is not good for the banks (who cares); but the financials are still a big chunk of the S&P.
c) This move will likely cause more “unwanted inflation”. If China or India is faced with negative returns on their reserves, they might be inclined to just buy commodities with the billions of cash they are sitting on. Prices of grains, beans, copper, coal and oil come to mind. Gold would be on the list as well.
d) If three-month bills went from +8bp to -7bp you might think that it wouldn't matter. The change is so small on a relative basis. I think of it as stepping off the edge of a cliff.
The entire global financial system is based on fiat money and the presumption that the money has “value” as a store of wealth. Nearly every action by the Fed over the past few years has led to the debasement of money. In the final stage, the issuers of money debase it to the point where it is no longer desirable to hold. I see the move to negative rates across the globe as a tipping point, one that will be damn hard to reverse once undertaken.
.
.
end
It seems that our Libor rate setters took "requests" from companies to alter their rate so that they could earn big money.
This is getting hotter by the minute:
(courtesy zero hedge)
The Hedge Fund Trail In Liborgate Gets Hotter: Mega Fund Brevan Howard Next?
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 12:55 -0400
- Barclays
- Brevan Howard
- British Bankers' Association
- Convexity
- Exchange Traded Fund
- fixed
- LIBOR
- RBS
- Reality
- Switzerland
Two days ago we made the "missing link" connection between traders in Libor manipulating banks (all of which curiously had a hub in Singapore: something else for the media that has been about 4 years too late on this topic to focus on) and hedge funds (most of which curiously centering on the otherwise sleepy bastion of banking: Geneva, Switzerland). The immediate aftermath was the loss of trading privileges of one Michael Zrihen. We are fairly certain this is just the beginning of the hedge fund bust: when all is said and done, many more funds will have terminated traders they hired for reasons (and kickbacks) unknown over the past 2 years as Lie-bor manipulators sought to put a clean firewalled break between their old employer and current one. Because apparently sometimes the regulators are that stupid and can be confused by a simple job change. And while many have assumed (and even calculated based on completely groundless assumptions) that only BBA member banks have benefited from Libor manipulation, the reality is that hedge funds were just as complicit and benefited just as much if not more. What is worse, they took advantage of their whale client status with manipulating banks, and courtesy of Total Return Swap and other leveraged gimmicks, made far more money when they co-opted two or more banks to do their bidding. Impossible you say: hedge funds would never be so stupid. Oh very possible: we present exhibit A - Brevan Howard, a "fund, with assets of $20.8 billion as of Dec. 31, has never had a losing year and returned 14.4 percent annualized from its April 2003 inception through the end of 2008" as Bloomberg said in a made to order profile of the funds recently. Perhaps there is a very simple reason for this trading perfection: "Brevan Howard telephoned on 20 Aug 2007 to ask the defendant to change the Libor rate," according to a paper filed with the Singapore High Court cited by Bloomberg."
Here is The Telegraph with a smoking gun that was promptly buried in the avalanche of sudden media coverage in the aftermath of the Barclays Liborgate settlement.
Tan Chi Min, a former RBS trader who claims he was wrongfully dismissed by the bank after it fired him for allegedly trying to manipulate Libor - the average rate at which banks lend to each other - said he had received the request in 2007 from Brevan Howard.
"Brevan Howard telephoned on 20 Aug 2007 to ask the defendant to change the Libor rate," according to a paper filed with the Singapore High Court cited by Bloomberg.
Oops.
That one statement should be enough to send shivers into the heart of whoever may be General Counsel of Brevan Howard (and many other mega funds right now whose names will make front page appearances in the coming weeks), as it provides the banks with something that so far has been missing. Motive. Because while it may be difficult to prove that Barclays or RBS benefited from Libor manipulation, pandering to a mega client is very, very easy to prove - there is always a trace. It also makes it very easy for the prosecution to include hedge funds, which are just as hated by the general populace as big banks if not more, into what is shaping up as one perfect litigation storm (and distraction from the real culprit here: the global central bank cartel).
Telegraph goes on:
The court filing alleges RBS "received this request without objection". Brevan Howard is not a party to the lawsuit and is not being investigated or sued for any alleged wrongdoing. RBS and Brevan Howard both declined to comment.
Mr Tan claimed in his filing that Scott Nygaard, head of short-term markets finance at RBS, knew about the call from Brevan Howard. However, the filing contained no further details to support his allegations. However, he is reported to have said he would provide further evidence at a later stage.
The legal case follows Mr Tan's firing in December over allegations he had attempted to improperly influence RBS's Libor-setting staff between 2007 and 2011. Mr Tan, who worked for RBS in Singapore as head of delta trading, claims he was wrongfully dismissed by the bank.
Ah yes our old friends: the ubiquitous Delta Traders who somehow have a finger in everything from ETF trading, to gamma, to convexity trades, and now- serving as the nexus between Libor manipulation demanding clients and in house Libor fixers.
The plot just gets thicker and thicker.
Mr Tan is claiming $1.5m (£943,000) in bonuses and 3.3m RBS shares that he says the bank owes him in pay. He claims in his lawsuit that asking for changes in Libor was "common practice" among RBS traders and that the bank "took requests from clients" to alter the rate.
And there it is: "Took requests from clients" not just manipulated rates for its own interest. And this is where the universe of guilty parties explodes exponentially, and reaches not only Geneva Switzerland, but virtually every single hedge fund that had even a modest fixed income trading link over the past decade.
Watch this space closely: it will get very hot soon.
end
The mayor of Baltimore is taking on the Libor crooks and will sue for millions!!!
(courtesy the London Guardian) and special thanks to Don Jack for providing...
HEADLINE: 'We are not afraid' ... US mayor suing for millions over Libor
BYLINE: Dominic Rushe New York
BODY:
A little over two years ago Stephanie Rawlings-Blake had never heard of Libor. The mayor of Baltimore had other things to keep her occupied. Elected in 2010, she was dealing with the aftermath of a financial crisis that had left her city with a budget deficit of $120m (£76m) and the cost of cleaning up the worst two-day snow storm in the city's history. And then she found out the credit crunch had come back to take another bite out of the city's finances.
Baltimore is lead plaintiff in a class action suit which alleges that banks including Barclays, Bank of America, HSBC, JP Morgan and UBS conspired to fix a set of key interest rates - the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) - and cost the city millions in the process. So far the Libor scandal has played out mostly under the radar in the US. But now the affair is gaining traction in Washington and Baltimore's lawsuit is putting a human face on a scandal legal experts predict could end up being the most costly of the credit crisis. Rawlings-Blake claims firemen, services for the elderly, school programmes and more are being cut as a direct result of the bankers' actions.
According to the court documents Baltimore bought "tens of millions of dollars' worth of interest rate swaps" during the period when the alleged fixing took place. The suit alleges that between August 2007 and May 2010 the defendants conspired to suppress Libor below the levels at which it would have been set had they accurately reported their borrowing costs. Those manipulations had "severe adverse consequences" for Baltimore and others, according to the suit. Other US cities are watching carefully.
Baltimore had no choice but to fight, said Rawlings-Blake. "We are faced with closing fire companies, recreational centres, we have services that have been cut year after year, services that people depend on. Opportunities for young people, cleanliness of the city, everything is affected by the budget. We can't afford to leave money on the table."
The city has a reputation for taking on the banks. This month Wells Fargo settled a suit launched by the city four years ago that alleged it discriminated against black and Latino mortgage borrowers.
"It's certainly disappointing and I understand why a lot of people have lost a lot of trust and faith in the financial institutions. They are pretty much playing fast and loose with the people they are meant to protect," she said.
"We stand up for ourselves. One thing about Baltimore is that we are not afraid of a fight. There are too many needs we have in this city."
But this case looks set to put all others in the shade. Policymakers around the world are calling for an overhaul of the Libor system, which underpins $500trn of contracts globally - everything from home loans to arcane derivatives.
Stephen Bainbridge, a professor of law at the University of California, said the case was "one of the worst examples of abuse of trust that I can remember in 25 years of following corporate governance". Given the scale of Libor's influence, he said this could emerge as "the defining financial scandal of the meltdown".
Bainbridge believes the US justice department may build an anti-trust case against those involved that could ultimately lead to a settlement as large as that agreed in the US's massive suit against the tobacco industry. Anti-trust laws allow damages to be tripled for those convicted of collusion.
But he believes a suit such as Baltimore's may be harder to prove. The city's lawyers will have to prove direct "loss causation" - that bankers fixing rates in London directly hit Baltimore's account balance. "Proving that chain of events can be difficult," said Bainbridge.
Baltimore city solicitor George Nilson, however, said he was confident there was a good case to answer. He pointed out that the process of discovery - when the city gets hold of internal emails and documents from the bank - had not even started yet.
Nilson said his one fear was that just as some banks were too big to fail, this could be a case that was "too big to try".
Captions:
Stephanie Rawlings-Blake said services in Baltimore had closed because of the Libor scandal Photograph: Gail Burton/AP
LOAD-DATE: July 19, 2012.
(as an aside, I am sure the good folks over at Birmingham Alabama also have their sites fixated on our Libor crooks)
end
Yesterday, an Italian prosecutor is setting his eyes on the Euribor fixing:
(courtesy Dow Jones international news) and special thanks to Don Jack for providing this to me
HEADLINE: Italian Prosecutor Said to Open Probe Into Euribor Fixing
BODY:
ROME--An Italian court has begun a probe into possible manipulation of the Euribor, a benchmark interest rate for an array of financial products, two Italian consumer lobbies said Friday.
Michele Ruggiero, a prosecutor in the southern town of Trani, has opened a criminal probe into potential market-rigging and fraud through manipulation of the Euribor rate, Federconsumatori said on its website.
Federconsumatori and Adusbef recently filed a complaint to the Trani court. Adusbef, another consumer rights lobby, said Italian mortgage holders had suffered at least 3 billion euros ($3.7 billion) in losses due to manipulation of the Euribor rate.
Mr. Ruggiero has ordered Italy's tax police to gather relevant documents and has set up a team of experts to conduct the probe, Federconsumatori said.
Mr. Ruggiero is also leading a criminal probe into alleged misconduct by major rating agencies, all of which have downgraded Italy's sovereign credit rating in the past year.
Write to Christopher Emsden at chris.emsden@dowjones.com
Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires [ 20-07-12 0914GMT ]
NOTES:
PUBLISHER: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
LOAD-DATE: July 20, 2012
end
Now, Wall Street is set to attack its own as those who did not set the rates attack their fellow brethren.
(courtesy Ed Steer and Bloomberg)
Feeding Frenzy Seen If Wall Street Sues Itself Over Libor
Wall Street, grappling with mounting regulatory probes and investor claims over alleged interest-rate manipulation, may face yet another formidable foe: Itself.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley are among financial firms that may bring lawsuits against their biggest rivals as regulators on three continents examine whether other banks manipulated the London interbank offered rate, known as Libor, said Bradley Hintz, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. Even if Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley forgo claims on their own behalf, they oversee money-market funds that may be required to pursue restitution for injured clients, he said.
Because Libor is based on submissions from only some of the world’s largest banks, the probes threaten to pit firms uninvolved in setting the rate against any implicated in its manipulation, Hintz said. Libor serves as a benchmark for at least $360 trillion in securities.
Yes, it will certainly be interesting to watch this all unfold. This Bloomberg offering was posted on their website late yesterday afternoon...and I thank West Virginia reader Elliot Simon for bringing it to our attention. It's certainly worth reading...and the link is here.
end
There is another big Financial times article for you to red written by Patrick Jenkins and Caroline Binham of Bloomberg. It was published in the London Financial times where it was reported that the UK's FSA is stepping up its probe on the Libor scandal.
It seems that the key player is Barclay's Philip Moryoussef who was the centre of things as he received and manipulated the rates basically from the Singapore hub. The article suggests that the 3 other kingpins that we identified for you on Thursday were:
i) Michael Zrihen of Credit Agricole. he has been removed from trading by his new employer.
ii) Didier Sander of HSBC iii) Christian Bittar of Deutsche Bank.
you will recall that Deutsche Bank turned in state's evidence so that they are basically immune to prosecution.
I have the article and I will try to copy and paste this important article for you onto my commentary today.
end
The rats are fleeing a sinking ship!!
(courtesy zero hedge)
Scandal At The IMF: Senior Economist Resigns, Says "Ashamed To Have Had Any Association With Fund At All"
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 14:58 -0400
The rats everywhere are now jumping furiously off the titanic, but few had taken the time to write a letter explaining in detail just how broken the Titanic was just as it was sinking This has now changed, with the departure of Peter Doyle, formerly a division chief in the IMF’s European Department responsible for non-crisis countries and currently an adviser to the Fund. Not content with quietly slinking off the scandal ridden organization which has become the butt of all jokes in the international community, where humor about Lagarde's Louis Vuitton panhandling bag is as pervasive as punchlines about just how incompetent the organization is at actually doing its duty, Doyle has penned the following scathing letter which tears down every myth about the IMF: from its impartiality, to the selection process of its head, to its effectiveness. The letter also contains the following gem: "After twenty years of service, I am ashamed to have had any association with the Fund at all." Pretty much says it all. This is a scandal in the making, and one which may shake to the core the credibility of the IMF in the context of international organization.
Full letter (pdf)
European Department
Washington DC
June 18, 2012
To Mr. Shaalan, Dean of the IMF Executive Board
Today, I addressed the Executive Board for the last time—because I am leaving the Fund.
Accordingly, I wanted first to formally express my deep appreciation to the Swedish, Israeli, and Danish authorities with whom I have worked recently, as well as all others with whom I have worked earlier, for their extraordinary generosity towards me personally.
But I also wanted to take this opportunity to explain my departure.
After twenty years of service, I am ashamed to have had any association with the Fund at all.
This is not solely because of the incompetence that was partly chronicled by the OIA report into the global crisis and the TSR report on surveillance ahead of the Euro Area crisis. More so, it is because the substantive difficulties in these crises, as with others, were identified well in advance but were suppressed here. Given long gestation periods and protracted international decision-making processes to head off both these global challenges, timely sustained warnings were of the essence. So the failure of the Fund to issue them is a failing of the first order, even if such warnings may not have been heeded. The consequences include suffering (and risk of worse to come) for many including Greece, that the second global reserve currency is on the brink, and that the Fund for the past two years has been playing catch-up and reactive roles in the last-ditch efforts to save it.
Further, the proximate factors which produced these failings of IMF surveillance—analytical risk aversion, bilateral priority, and European bias—are, if anything, becoming more deeply entrenched, notwithstanding initiatives which purport to address them. This fact is most clear in regard to appointments for Managing Director which, over the past decade, have all-too-evidently been disastrous. Even the current incumbent is tainted, as neither her gender, integrity, or élan can make up for the fundamental illegitimacy of the selection process. In a hierarchical place like this, the implications of those choices filter directly to others in senior management, and via the appointments, fixed term contracts, and succession planning of senior staff, they go on to infuse the organization as a whole, overwhelming everything else. A handicapped Fund, subject to those proximate roots of surveillance failure, is what the Executive Board prefers. Would that I had understood twenty years ago that this would be the choice.
There are good salty people here. But this one is moving on. You might want to take care not to lose the others.
cc. Ms. Nemat Shafik
Mr. Stanley Fischer
Mr. Stephan Ingves
Mr. Benny Andersen
Mr. Alex Gibbs
Mr. Eric Meyer
Mr. Amit Friedman
Mr. Martin Holmberg
Mr. Reza Moghadam
Mr. Mark Plant
Mr. Brad McDonald
end
I will leave you today with this offering from Wolf Richter on the hopeless plight of Southern Europe:
(courtesy Wolf Richter)
“Southern Europe Does Almost Nothing—Except Complain”
Submitted by testosteronepit on 07/20/2012 19:55 -0400
- Bulgaria
- default
- Eastern Europe
- European Central Bank
- Eurozone
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
- International Monetary Fund
- National Debt
- Recession
- Reserve Currency
- Unemployment
- World Bank
Wolf Richter www.testosteronepit.com
“While Eastern Europe is largely implementing the necessary reforms, Southern Europe does almost nothing—except complain,” said Bulgarian Finance Minister Simeon Djankov in aninterview, a withering blast aimed at neighboring Greece.
And in Greece, “The risk of bankruptcy is still existent,” saidFotis Kouvelis, the leader of Democratic Left, smallest of the three parties in the coalition government. His way of reminding the bailout Troika—the EU, the European Central Bank (ECB), and the IMF—to open the money spigot all the way, or else! The Troika inspectors are scheduled to return to Athens next week to have another look [read.... Greece Flails About, Troika Inspectors Paint “Awful Picture,” Merkel Draws A Line, German Industry & Voters Back Her: It’s Almost Over For Greece].
In September, armed with the inspectors’ final report, the Troika will decide whether or not to make the next bailout payment to Greece. If the decision is no, Greece will default and most likely return to the drachma.
“We demand an extension,” Kouvelis said, summarizing eloquently the strategy since the June elections. Instead of implementing with fiendish dedication the reforms that the prior government had agreed to in exchange for the second bailout package, the new government insists on renegotiating those reforms and then delaying those renegotiated reforms, while insisting on the continuous flow of other people’s billions. He complained about the recession, and that therefore structural reforms couldn’t be implemented.
But neighboring Bulgaria is one of the EU’s fastest growing economies. It has the second lowest national debt of all EU countries and even sports a budget surplus. Individual and corporate income tax rates are 10%. And it’s one of only three EU countries in compliance with the financial stability criteria in the Maastricht treaty. The very criteria that were supposed to have prevented the debt crisis ravaging the Eurozone. So the fiscal union treaty, pushed through by Chancellor Angela Merkel but hung up in the German Constitutional Court, is supposed to accomplish the same thing that the Maastricht treaty already failed to accomplish: force countries to obey limits on deficits and debt.
But Bulgaria has been in compliance, in part due to Djankov, who became Finance Minister in 2009, after a 14-year stint at the World Bank. When asked if his country, still one of the poorest in the EU, wasn’t balancing its budget at the expense of the people, he said: “That is a false and dangerous contradiction that the Southern Europeans recently added to the debate. Countries like Germany, Finland, or also Bulgaria have growing economies and still adhere to the deficit rules. Balanced budgets and growth are not a contradiction. Prerequisite is that the necessary reforms are implemented.”
Spain has been trying to do that. But people resist. With unemployment at 24.4%, their government on the brink of financial doom, and their banks collapsing, Spaniards have turned to protests. Yesterday, firefighters were on the forefront. While some battled the police, others protested tongue in cheek, and with a good laugh, making their point with perfect visual clarity—and with a lot of bare skin. Read.... Naked Firefighters Protest Salary Cuts (VIDEO - they use their hands or helmets to cover up their equipment).
And in Greece, reforms just aren’t implemented. Even the privatization of bloated state-owned enterprises is bogged down. 28 projects by 2015: electricity provider DEI, the postal service, airports, railroads, ports, hospitals.... For €19 billion, an amount that keeps shrinking. But this year, only two projects are on the list: the national lottery and the former International Center of the Olympic Press, a mere building.
And so, Costas Mitropoulos, the frustrated CEO of the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund, which was put in place a year ago to implement the privatizations, resigned. “The newly elected government has not given the support needed,” Mitropoulos wrote in his letter of resignation. “Instead, they have indirectly yet systematically reduced the prestige and credibility in the eyes of potential investors.”
And the argument that Bulgaria has an advantage over Greece because it has its own currency doesn’t hold water. After losing value at an exponential rate, the lev was pegged to the Deutsche Mark in 1999 at 1:1 and then to the euro at the DM’s conversion rate. And the peg has held! Alas, Bulgaria was scheduled to adopt the euro by January 1, 2012. A deadline that came and went. So was Djankov hesitating to adopt the euro? “Hesitating?” he said. “More than that. We put the process on ice. We first want to see what the future rules of the Eurozone look like.”
If it sticks around. In December 2001, when I was in Germany on business, bank showcases were filled with feel-good euro agitprop. Euros would enter circulation on January 1, and this was part of the campaign to persuade Germans to surrender their Deutsche Marks. Some were apprehensive, but my business contacts were gleeful: the euro would become the dominant reserve currency, and oil would be priced in it! Read....Now Even Counterfeiters Are Giving up on the Euro.
I wish you all to have a grand weekend. I will catch up with you Monday night.
all the best
Harvey
1. Central Fund of Canada: traded to a positive 2.1percent to NAV in usa funds and a positive 2.4% to NAV for Cdn funds. ( July 21-.2012)
2. Sprott silver fund (PSLV): Premium to NAV rose to 3.26% to NAV July 21 2012 :
3. Sprott gold fund (PHYS): premium to NAV rose to 2.91% positive to NAV July 19.2012). .
Finally, we are now starting to see premiums return to the Sprott silver fund. No doubt, in 3 to 4 weeks we will be back to previous premium levels as inventories around the world deplete in silver. The fact that Sprott removed 250 million dollars worth of silver is a dagger to our bankers.
end
Gold COT Report - Futures
Large Speculators
Commercial
Total
Long
Short
Spreading
Long
Short
Long
Short
180,474
51,515
32,493
162,570
321,389
375,537
405,397
Change from Prior Reporting Period
-1,682
-4,406
2,261
-829
5,224
-250
3,079
Traders
151
64
80
46
42
231
165
Small Speculators
Long
Short
Open Interest
55,780
25,920
431,317
1,713
-1,616
1,463
non reportable positions
Change from the previous reporting period
COT Gold Report - Positions as of
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
In our Gold COT report:
Our large speculators:
Those large speculators that have been long in gold pitched 1682 contracts from their long side.
Those large speculators that have been short in gold covered a rather large 4406 contracts.
Our commercials:
Those commercials that have been long in gold pitched a very small 829 contracts.
Those commercials that have been short in gold added a very large 5224 contracts to their short side.
Our small specs:
Those small specs that have been long in gold added another 1713 contracts to their long side
Those small specs that have been short in gold covered 1616 contracts from their short side.
Conclusion:
slightly more bearish and thus an explanation as to why the bankers were trying to whack gold on Wednesday, Thursday and yesterday but failed.
Silver COT Report: Futures
Large Speculators
Commercial
Long
Short
Spreading
Long
Short
28,431
20,775
24,156
48,214
63,349
-3
1,123
-2,128
-157
871
Traders
58
47
46
38
34
Small Speculators
Open Interest
Total
Long
Short
121,819
Long
Short
21,018
13,539
100,801
108,280
-2
-2,156
-2,290
-2,288
-134
non reportable positions
Positions as of:
123
107
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
© SilverSeek.com
And now for our silver COT:
It seems that the players have vacated the silver arena:
Those large specs that have been long in silver pitched a minuscule 3 contracts from their long side.
Those large specs that have been short in silver added a tiny 1123 contracts to their short side.
Those commercials that are long in silver and close to the physical scene pitched a tiny 157 contracts from their long side.
Those commercials that have been perennially short in silver and subject to the silver CFTC probe, added another 871 contracts to their short side.
Small specs:
Those small specs that have long in silver pitched a very tiny 2 contracts from their long side.
Those small specs that have been short in silver covered 2156 contracts from their short side.
Conclusion:
it looks like the rats are leaving the ship!!
The following is a review of gold trading Thursday night from Europe and Asia with commentaries
from Goldcore.
(courtesy Goldcore)
Gold Q2, 2012 - Investment Statistics And Commentary
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 12:09 -0400
- Bridgewater
- British Pound
- Budget Deficit
- China
- Debt Ceiling
- Dubai
- Eurozone
- Global Economy
- Hong Kong
- India
- International Monetary Fund
- Monetary Policy
- Precious Metals
- Recession
- Reuters
- Ron Paul
- Swiss Franc
- Twitter
- United Kingdom
- Volatility
- World Gold Council
- Yen
Submitted by GoldCore
Gold Q2, 2012 - Investment Statistics And Commentary
Today's AM fix was USD 1,583.00, EUR 1,291.30, and GBP 1,007.83 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,580.00, EUR 1,287.06 and GBP 1,009.33 per ounce.
Silver is trading at $27.07/oz, €22.22/oz and £17.32/oz. Platinum is trading at $1,418.25/oz, palladium at $577.80/oz and rhodium at $1,190/oz.
Gold rose $3.70 or 0.23% in New York yesterday and closed at $1,581.00/oz. It rose as high as $1,590/oz prior to determined selling which saw gold fall. Gold ticked higher in Asia prior to falling soon after the European open.
Gold has been trading in a range between $1,530/oz and $1,630/oz for nearly 2 months despite the Eurozone debt crisis entering its 3rd year and looking set to escalate and despite signs that the US economy is on the verge of a sharp recession.
These two factors alone mean that gold will likely resume its upward march due to continuing safe haven demand. The likelihood of further QE from the Fed will be icing on the cake for gold and silver.
US data yesterday showed factory activity shrunk in July for a 3rd consecutive month and the jobless claims rose last week.
Those who continue to put “lipstick on the pig” that is the US economy are lulling themselves and other unfortunates into another false sense of security.
“Blue skies thinking” regarding individual economies and the global economy got us into this mess and it will not get us out.
The World Gold Council have just published their commentary on gold’s price performance in various currencies, its volatility statistics and correlation to other assets in the quarter -
It provides macroeconomic context to the investment statistics published at the end of each quarter and highlights emerging themes relevant to gold’s future development.
One of their key findings is that gold will act as hedge against possible coming dollar weakness and gold will act as a "currency hedge in the international monetary system."
Key findings of the World Gold Council’s report:
Review: Key Macroeconomic Themes During Q2 2012
Gold prices declined in most currencies during the second quarter with the exception of the euro, Swiss franc and Indian rupee, in part due to a strong US dollar. Despite a 3.8% decline in Q2 to US$1,598.50/oz on the London PM fix, gold was up 4.4% during the first half of the year. Volatility remained elevated amidst a busy event-risk period. However, gold generally outperformed risk assets.
Global inflation eases but underlying trends supportive for gold: A substantial drop in energy and some agricultural commodities during the period has eased inflation pressures in many parts of the world and put downward pressure on gold prices.
Reassessing “risk-free” assets: Even assets traditionally considered safe are under pressure. German Bunds interest rates climbed in June. The Swiss franc, yen and US Treasuries are also facing issues – challenging their role as assets of last resort. Despite pressures on the price of gold, its lack of credit risk, its liquidity and hedging characteristics has made gold an attractive vehicle for long-term wealth preservation.
Correlation between gold and risk assets approaches long-term averages: Gold’s correlation to equities and other risk assets fell towards long-run average levels in Q2 helping portfolio diversification. Gold’s increased correlation to equities in Q1 was an indirect effect related to a weaker global economy coupled with a stronger US dollar.
Outlook: Emerging Macroeconomic Themes In H2 2012
Deflationary concerns in some countries provide room for further fiscal and monetary stimulus. This may lead to a further debasement of currencies through unconventional monetary policy and an increased risk of future inflation. These factors should provide support for future gold investment.
The underlying structural issues that affect the euro zone remain unresolved, despite advances in the formation of more comprehensive burden-sharing mechanisms. In such an environment of uncertainty and higher market volatility, gold will continue to be an asset that investors use to diversify risk and preserve capital.
The flight to the US dollar as a safe-haven in the first half of 2012 could be reversed. The US debt ceiling debate in Q3 and federal elections in November, followed by the necessity to confront a US$1.3tn budget deficit will prove challenging to the US dollar. With most currencies under pressure in one form or another, gold is likely to provide a hedging mechanism for investors
Dr. Constantin Gurdgiev, a non Executive member of theGoldCore Investment Committee, has analysed the Q2, 2012 World Gold Council data and has written a blog post that can be read here or see commentary.
He finds that the report is worth a read as it shows how gold generally outperformed risk assets and helped portfolio diversification.
He warns that safe haven government debt markets have all the hallmarks of “return-free risks” rather than “risk-free returns.”
The World Gold Council’s ‘Quarterly statistics commentary Q2 2012’ can be read here.
(Bloomberg) -- China Plans to Start Interbank Gold Trading on Local Market
China is preparing to introduce an interbank gold-trading system, a move that may enable domestic banks to treat the precious metal as a more liquid asset and increase holdings.
The Shanghai Gold Exchange, the country’s biggest spot market, has been working with the China Foreign Exchange Trade System since the start of the year, Gu Wenshuo, an exchange spokesman, said today. The original plan was for the new system to be running at the end of August, Gu said by phone, adding that details are unavailable as banks are giving feedback.
China has been the largest producer since 2007, and was the biggest user after India last year. An interbank gold-trading system is part of broader reforms that Beijing aims to introduce to make the financial sector more market-driven, according to Jiang Shu, a senior analyst at Industrial Bank Co. Ltd.
“China is already very important in terms of gold production and consumption,” said Jeffrey Rhodes, global head of precious metals in Dubai at INTL FCStone Inc., a New York- based trading and brokerage firm. “If a new interbank market really does flourish, it could put the Chinese market in the mainstream and become world-class.”
Spot gold was 0.2 percent higher at $1,584.65 an ounce at 3:38 p.m. in Shanghai. The metal, which reached a record $1,921.15 in September, has rallied for 11 years on emerging- market and investment demand, as well as central-bank purchases.
Gold imports by mainland China from Hong Kong reached 314,810 kilograms in the first five months, compared with 39,607.4 kilograms a year ago, according to Bloomberg calculations based on data from the Hong Kong government.
For breaking news and commentary on financial markets and gold, follow us on Twitter.
NEWS
Gold steady on weak U.S. data; dollar weighs – Reuters
Gold advances for second day - MarketWatch
UK housing slump will deepen, warns IMF – The Telegraph
COMMENTARY
Dr Gurdgiev: Q2 Report From The World Gold Council – True Economics
China’s Coming Assault on the Western Financial System – The Daily Reckoning
World economy now effectively a multitrillion-dollar game of chicken – Resource Clips
LBMA's gold price fixing scheme about to collapse, London trader tells KWN
Submitted by cpowell on Fri, 2012-07-20 19:07. Section: Daily Dispatches
3p ET Friday, July 20, 2012
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
The London trader source of King World News reports today that the nakedness of unallocated and even some supposedly allocated positions in the London bullion market now is being discussed openly and he expects defaults resulting in cash settlement as the prices of gold and silver vault higher. He adds that demand from China is steady and that China has accumulated far more metal than is being reported. An excerpt from the interview is headlined "The LBMA Gold Price Fixing Scheme Is Over" and it's posted at the King World News blog here:
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
end
Jim Sinclair launches operation: Investor's Spring Freedom against our crooked bankers.
He urges us to approach mining CEO's and tell them our concerns at what the big bankers are doing to our economy:
Investor’s Spring–Freedom!
My Dear Extended Family,
Investor’s Spring. Freedom at last!
You know that I have spent a good part of my life in an attempt to better understand the human experience looking for purpose. I would like to share with you a short conversation I had with Sai Baba in India in 1986. He said to me "What would you do if I made you a warrior?" The room was full of spiritually liberal people. I answered "make great war." There was a collective gasp by the attendees. Sai Baba said, "Right Answer, Sinclair."
Nobody wants war, but if it comes your way, and is your duty to pursue, it must be done, and done well. This war has been brought to us by those that would profit by destruction in clear violation of common commercial code.
These demons do not just short a situations based on a premise and await profit.
They pound mercilessly on the bids, seeking to depress the price.
They sell short the shares index and other funds buy as a means to get large numbers.
They immediately start dirty tricks.
They turn you in to regulatory bodies in the area of your trading and in the country of your operation on constructed nonsense.
They seek authors to write negative articles from their imagination to insult your integrity as a company not only where you work, but also where you trade.
They pay people to adopt a multitude of nicknames to post horrific lies about you personally and your company on chat boards.
They have a trading campaign to sell every instance of good news you have.
They have a trading campaign to sell your positive closes within the last 30 seconds of the trading day.
They enter orders with brokers who know what they want to happen in sizes larger than the total average daily trading to sell at the market on the close of Fridays.
They trade other exchange listed shares on the NASDAQ out of line with the listed close to skew the closing prices to the negative.
They actually paint the charts with their trading to make your situation less attractive technically.
These are only a few of the standard dirty tricks they execute in order to profit from these illegal acts to profit from the short which is the fruit of their crimes.
Their offense is violation of common commercial code. The short is simply the means of illicit profits. I do not intend to preach to you, but rather lead by example.
Your job is to get the attention first of those that are the management and directors of the companies you invest in that have been manipulated. You may have to be strong in order to accomplish this.
I am obligated in my corporate position to defend the company to the limit of my ability. I am obligated to say no, not on my watch. I am obligated to use all means, including litigation, to protect capital value on behalf of the investors. If I failed to do that I would be liable to you. This is true of every investment you have, not only precious metals shares.
Step one of "Investor’s Spring, Freedom" is to raise hell with the management and directors of your investments to take action to protect your interests from illegal and unethical activities. Tell them remedy exists in common commercial code moreso than securities laws.
I will let you know what I am doing as I do it. I will lead other companies to protect you by example.
It is up to you to do one simple thing. Wake up this bunch of brain dead office decorations, professional campers and rock hounds and get them to follow me in my march forward.
Respectfully,
Jim
end
Our friends over at the Silverdoctors.com web site has released the audio of the interview with Bill Murphy of GATA with respect to his London source. As a reminder, this London trader's views on what will happen have been 100% accurate over these past several years. The London trader believes that silver will explode in August.
Will it be because of the CFTC ruling that will be coming? Do not know, but something big is going to happen.
Listen...
10,276
end
Overnight in Europe we witnessed the risk is off trade with all Asian and European bourses in the red. The Euro/USA cross proceeded south and at 8 am est was trading at 1.2234. All eyes were on Spain with respect to the terms of what it will receive for its banking rescue. If you will recall, 30 billion euros was to come by the end of July. Markets were waiting for official news on this and on new terms. Loans will be forthcoming once stress tests on the banks in question commence.
The 10 yr Spanish bond yield again traded wider at 7.11%, with the Italian 10 year bond yield rising above the 6% level trading at 6.10%
(your overnight sentiment from Europe, courtesy zero hedge 8.am est Friday morning)
Overnight Sentiment: Europe Threatens Market Surreality Again
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 07:08 -0400
It is a quiet session so far with risk in the Off position (for now - we have yet to see the sinusoid HFT stop triggering function which rises stocks artificially as yesterday demonstrated so very well to nobody's surprise). All eyes are once again focusing to Europe, pushing the EURUSD lower for at least a few more hours until Europe closes and the repatriation resumes. In terms of key European events, today is the EU finance minister’s conference call on Spain today. As DB summarizes, officials are expected to approve the EU100 billion Spanish bank rescue plan however the exact size of the loan will probably only be determined in September pending the result of a bank-by-bank stress test. This will then pave way for restructuring plans for the sector in October which is broadly consistent with the timeline set out in the leaked draft MoU. At the previous meeting finance ministers agreed to first disburse EU30bn to Spain by the end of July so we will watch out for further confirmation of this today. We may also get the terms of the loan today. The conference call is expected to start at 10am GMT. What is odd is that unlike before when the mere possibility of a European catalyst was enough to push risk higher, this is no longer the case, and Spanish spreads to Bunds just hit another all time wide, with the Spanish 10 Year plunging to 7.11%, another post-summit high, this time dragging the Italian 10 Year which was at 6.10% at last check. And as explained before, the European uber pair trade means that as PIIGS yields soar, the core drops to new record, in most cases, negative nominal lows.
Will the world once again be able to ignore the once-again imploding European reality (and American: Of the 35 S&P 500 firms that reported results yesterday, about 74% of those came ahead of market consensus but only 57% of those topped sales forecasts.), and send the ES to a green close on the day? Or is today the day when reality comes back with a vengeance? Stay tuned and find out.
end
Opening Spanish 10 yr yield at 8 am est:
SPANISH GOVERNMENT GENERIC BONDS - 10 YR NOTE
Add to Portfolio
GSPG10YR:IND
7.100000.08900 1.27%
Your opening Italian 10 yr bond yield: (8 am est)
Italy Govt Bonds 10 Year Gross Yield
Add to Portfolio
GBTPGR10:IND
6.066000.06500 1.08%
As of 07:40:00 ET on 07/20/2012.
end
In the following video, Stratfor's Adrian Bosoni highlights the fundamental contradictions and the major flaw in the European financial crisis. We see that ECB board member Asmussen, and German minister Schaeuble both steadfastly state that there will be no money transfer without a sovereignty (fiscal) transfer. Bosoni states correctly that this is the proper way to proceed on a long term basis in order to have a robust and unified budgetary regime. The flaw: the length of time to ratify this. Spain, Portugal, and Greece all have very short time horizons due to their massive problems and all have asked for a delay in implementing a balancing of their budgetary deficits. In other words, the PIIGS nations are asking for continual bailouts with the hope that they will get their act together.
the video is a must see as it gives a terrific review of the problems facing Spain and other PIIGS nations. This was released a few hours before the Valencia announcement.The video is 3 1/2 minutes.
(courtesy, Bosoni/Stratfor/zero hedge)
Europe's Fundamental Flaw Resurfaces
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/19/2012 19:54 -0400
"Two weeks after a summit that promised to bring solutions to the European financial crisis, the European Union has once again revealed its fundamental contradictions" is how Stratfor's Adrian Bosoni introduces a succinct clip on the reality the European leaders faced once they arrived home after that strenuous weekend of blithering. Between Asmussen and Schaeuble who have steadfastly stuck to the no-monetary-transfer-without-sovereign-transfer tack - which actually make a fair amount of sense on a long-term basis - a robust and unified budgetary regime is precisely what Europe has lacked. Unfortunately, Bosoni notes, "even in a best case scenario this could not be achieved before 2015" thanks to treaties, referenda, and ratifications. In a little over 3 minutes, the analyst outlines exactly what is holding it back and why the short-term is all they have as budgetary discipline is proving particularly difficult for the EU members to maintain (see more Spanish riots tonight). Between Spain's delays in meeting targets, Greece's 'impossible' budgetary goals, Ireland's demands for concessions, and Finland's collateral agreement with Spain, unifying anything over there seems impractical and impossible.
A must watch for the quickest summary of the state of Europe - and the best explanation of the reality to which European credit markets are cracking as opposed to the nominal price of global equities leaking higher...
Valencia Announces SOS, Needs To Tap Government LIquidity Support Just Eurogroup Accepts Spanish Bailout Plan
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 07:58 -0400
Just as today's largely expected announcement that the Eurogroup has formally agreed to accept the Spanish bail out (details still lacking), the Spanish region of Valencia just became the second to officially demand a bailout following Catalunya's comparable announcement at the end of May, and has announced it will need to tap the government liquidity mechanism. Kneejerk reaction: EURUSD sharply lower and below 1.22 for the first time in days.
From Reuters:
Spain's heavily indebted eastern region of Valencia said on Friday it would apply for help under the government's 18 billion euro plan passed on Thursday aimed at helping regional finances.
The plan comes with strict conditionality that a region stick to its deficit cutting plans.
Concurrent with this announcement, Spain also announced an update to its deficit projections, whose details are meaningless as they will be revised adversely shortly, which confirmed that the Spanish economy continues to deteriorate at an accelerating pace.
Spanish Stocks Plunge Most In 12 Months As Egan-Jones Cuts Spain To CC+
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 10:50 -0400
With IBEX down 6%, 10Y yields over 7.30%, 10Y spread over 610bps, and EURJPY at 12 year lows; the hits just keep coming. From Ega-Jones:
Slipping - Spain's 10 year debt is now yielding 7.18%, which is a reflection of the weakening of the economy and the credit quality of Spain. In addition to the expected austerity riots, the latest news is that Valencia and other regions will need $15B of aid, the sen. debtholders of the weak banks will be forced to take losses, and there might be some sharing of losses among all banks. An estimated decline in GDP of 1.7% (per the Economy Ministry), the 25% unemployment, the IIF's recent estimate of addl bank loan losses up to EUR260B, and possible depositor withdrawals hurt. From 2008 to 2011, Spain's debt mushroomed from EUR436B to EUR735B while its GDP declined from EUR1.09T to EUR1.07T. Social benefits are a major problem; while pmts to the govt have been more or less flat over the past four years (up EUR 3B), payments from the government have been up EUR 45B. As a result, Spain is short about EUR50B per year for social payments, EUR20B per year for interest, and an additional EUR 20B for asset growth; hence the EUR90B per annum increase in debt.
Spain will inevitably be faced with addl pmts to support a portion its banking sector and for its weaker provinces. Assets of Spain's largest two banks exceed its GDP. We are slipping our rating to "CC+"; watch for more requests for support from the banks and money creation.
via Bloomberg.
Europe Ends In A Sea Of Red
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 11:47 -0400
Spain's broad equity index suffered its second largest single-day drop in almost 4 years and Italy also tumbled almost 5% as everything European was sold hard. EuroStoxx (the broad Dow equivalent) is down almost 3% as EURUSD dropped to two year lows, EURJPY to 12 year lows. AAA safe havens were massively bid with Germany, Denmark, and Switzerland all to new low (negative) rate closes. Core equity markets did suffer though with Germany down 2% but it was the periphery that saw the damage in credit-land with Spain 10Y closing at 7.27%, 610bps over Bunds (and 5Y CDS over 605bps). Spanish spreads are +130bps from post-Summit (and pre-Summit) and Italy +78bps, but it is the front-end of the curve that is most worrisome - Spain's 2Y is 132bps wider in the last week. Europe's VIX exploded by over 4 vols to 24%today and once again looks decidedly high relative to US VIX.
Spain and Italy surging to as bad a performance as Portugal...post Summit...
but it is the front-end that is a disaster! This is where all the LTRO debt is being held that was put on as part of the Sarkozy carry trade - ECB margin calls here we come!!
but while this is apples to apple-like things comparisons, the difference between credit and equity market reactions post Summit remain remarkable...(though today saw a pretty decent turnaround)...
and broadly European stocks were hammered today as hope fades...
charts: Bloomberg
end
From the USA side of things, Bruce Krasting weighs in on Schumer's choice of words to Bernanke this week: " get to work, Mr Bernanke"
The Fed will have another FOMB meeting on August 1.
It is there that they will decide on the following;
1. Do nothing
ii) Extend ZIRP to 2014
iii) Announce another QEIII of say 250- 600 billion dollars
iv) Cut the deposit rate from 1/4% to 1/8%
Krasting believes it will be the latter and he gives his reasons why.
Also the consequences of that action.
(a must read)
Bernanke - Post Schumer Gaffe
Submitted by Bruce Krasting on 07/20/2012 08:59 -0400
- Ben Bernanke
- Bond
- China
- Copper
- CRAP
- European Central Bank
- Fail
- Finland
- Germany
- India
- Monetary Policy
- Ron Paul
- Switzerland
- Yield Curve
I'm adding myself to the long list of folks who have commented on NY Senator Chuck Schumer's choice of words to Bernanke the other day:
.
.
.
Schumer is a political hack. He wants the Fed to do ‘something’ today that would give the economy a lift heading into the election. Chuck knows that the Legislative side can’t/won’t do a thing before November, so he begs Ben to light another monetary fire to help the Democratic cause. Chucky boy is an ass.
I doubt that Bernanke listens to the noise from Senators very often, but Chuck’s words got a lot of press. I'm wondering what Ben is thinking. Schumer has brought politics into the outcome of the August 1st Fed meeting. Whatever Ben decides to do, he will be accused of partisan politics.
There are many scenarios for the August Fed meeting:
.
I) Do nothing
.
Arguments For:
a) The economy stinks, but it is not in a crisis. More “crisis monetary measures” are not justified.
b) With the 10-year already at 1.5%, the Fed can’t accomplish anything by pushing rates a few basis points lower.
Arguments Against:
The election and related political considerations will absolutely tie the Feds hands after the August meeting. The next chance for the Fed to “do something” will be in late November. If Bernanke wants to buy some insurance, he has to do something in August.
.
II) Extend the ZIRP language past 2014
.
Arguments For:
I can’t think of any.
Arguments Against.
Because there is no substance to this, there is a very strong likely hood that the markets will take a few seconds, and then puke. Bernanke knows this. He doesn’t want to lay an egg.
.
III) QE3 – $600B LSAP targeted to Agency Mortgage Bonds
.
Arguments For:
a) This is what the market wants to see. Failure to do QE3 will disappoint, Ben does not want to disappoint.
b) This a is “populist” approach. Ben can say that he is doing his best to allow homeowners to ReFi and prospective buyers to get a record low rate.
Arguments Against:
a) This is an “all in bet”. Even Bernanke has been questioning the efficacy of additional QE of late.
b) Senator Shelby and Speaker Boehner will say, “The Fed is printing money to play politics!”
c) Bernanke’s critics will go wild.
d) There is absolutely no certainty that another big LSAP will do a damn thing.
.
IV) QE3 - $250B LSAP targeted to Agency Mortgage Bonds
Arguments For:
A small QE would create less political backlash. Ben could argue that he is being “moderate” and will, as always, be willing to do more if this modest monetary “bump” proves to be inadequate.
Arguments Against:
a) A “half a loaf” is going to fail miserably. Bernanke wants monetary policy to jack up stocks, as he thinks this creates jobs. Stocks would nose dive if this is the result. Bernanke understands this.
b) Both Blues and Reds would be upset. Schumer will be pointing at Bernanke and saying, “He didn’t do his job!” At the same time Ron Paul would be calling for Ben’s head on a platter.
.
V) Something Else – A cut in the deposit rate from a 1/4% to a 1/8%
.
Arguments For:
a) This appears to be a modest step. As such, it would be less susceptible to criticism.
b) The small change in the deposit rate would achieve something that Bernanke has been shooting for a long time.Returns on short-term money would go negative. Three and Six month Bills would certainly be negative. One-year paper would trade around flat.
c) Germany and Switzerland are already in negative territory. Other, smaller bond markets like Finland and Sweden are also in the red. For the US to follow suit would not be that big a surprise. Bernanke could blunt critics by saying he had done less than Europe - an 1/8th in the US versus 0% for the ECB.
d) The change to negative yields, (regardless of how small), will force money to move around. There are trillions in money market funds, Trillions in short term Treasury paper, and trillions more on corporate balance sheets. All of this is now going to be looking at negative returns.
e) With the first rungs of the yield curve in the bucket, the longer maturities would be dragged down. The Ten-year would move toward 1%. This result would be similar to the (hoped for) outcome of a large LSAP.
f) Bernanke could still say, “The Fed has more it could do”, as the deposit rate could be cut again (to zero) at some point.
.
Of these options, I believe that #V has the greatest probability of occurring.
I hope that the Fed sits tight, and does nothing. But that seems unlikely. Bernanke knows that the economy is now decelerating, and that his hands get tied after the August meeting. So“something” is more likely than “nothing”.
It’s hard to predict what might happen if Ben pushes rates into negative territory. It could end up resulting in an orderly market transition from cash, to high-risk securities like stocks and junk bonds. The virtuous cycle of higher stocks leading to higher spending and more jobs might be the result. But I doubt it.
Arguments Against:
a) The knee jerk reaction to negative rates might be positive, but in a short period of time the market will come to realize that negative rates are not going to force people (more) into dividend stocks. Quite the opposite, it will scare the crap out of them.
b) This is not good for the banks (who cares); but the financials are still a big chunk of the S&P.
c) This move will likely cause more “unwanted inflation”. If China or India is faced with negative returns on their reserves, they might be inclined to just buy commodities with the billions of cash they are sitting on. Prices of grains, beans, copper, coal and oil come to mind. Gold would be on the list as well.
d) If three-month bills went from +8bp to -7bp you might think that it wouldn't matter. The change is so small on a relative basis. I think of it as stepping off the edge of a cliff.
The entire global financial system is based on fiat money and the presumption that the money has “value” as a store of wealth. Nearly every action by the Fed over the past few years has led to the debasement of money. In the final stage, the issuers of money debase it to the point where it is no longer desirable to hold. I see the move to negative rates across the globe as a tipping point, one that will be damn hard to reverse once undertaken.
.
.
end
It seems that our Libor rate setters took "requests" from companies to alter their rate so that they could earn big money.
This is getting hotter by the minute:
(courtesy zero hedge)
The Hedge Fund Trail In Liborgate Gets Hotter: Mega Fund Brevan Howard Next?
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 12:55 -0400
- Barclays
- Brevan Howard
- British Bankers' Association
- Convexity
- Exchange Traded Fund
- fixed
- LIBOR
- RBS
- Reality
- Switzerland
Two days ago we made the "missing link" connection between traders in Libor manipulating banks (all of which curiously had a hub in Singapore: something else for the media that has been about 4 years too late on this topic to focus on) and hedge funds (most of which curiously centering on the otherwise sleepy bastion of banking: Geneva, Switzerland). The immediate aftermath was the loss of trading privileges of one Michael Zrihen. We are fairly certain this is just the beginning of the hedge fund bust: when all is said and done, many more funds will have terminated traders they hired for reasons (and kickbacks) unknown over the past 2 years as Lie-bor manipulators sought to put a clean firewalled break between their old employer and current one. Because apparently sometimes the regulators are that stupid and can be confused by a simple job change. And while many have assumed (and even calculated based on completely groundless assumptions) that only BBA member banks have benefited from Libor manipulation, the reality is that hedge funds were just as complicit and benefited just as much if not more. What is worse, they took advantage of their whale client status with manipulating banks, and courtesy of Total Return Swap and other leveraged gimmicks, made far more money when they co-opted two or more banks to do their bidding. Impossible you say: hedge funds would never be so stupid. Oh very possible: we present exhibit A - Brevan Howard, a "fund, with assets of $20.8 billion as of Dec. 31, has never had a losing year and returned 14.4 percent annualized from its April 2003 inception through the end of 2008" as Bloomberg said in a made to order profile of the funds recently. Perhaps there is a very simple reason for this trading perfection: "Brevan Howard telephoned on 20 Aug 2007 to ask the defendant to change the Libor rate," according to a paper filed with the Singapore High Court cited by Bloomberg."
Here is The Telegraph with a smoking gun that was promptly buried in the avalanche of sudden media coverage in the aftermath of the Barclays Liborgate settlement.
Tan Chi Min, a former RBS trader who claims he was wrongfully dismissed by the bank after it fired him for allegedly trying to manipulate Libor - the average rate at which banks lend to each other - said he had received the request in 2007 from Brevan Howard.
"Brevan Howard telephoned on 20 Aug 2007 to ask the defendant to change the Libor rate," according to a paper filed with the Singapore High Court cited by Bloomberg.
Oops.
That one statement should be enough to send shivers into the heart of whoever may be General Counsel of Brevan Howard (and many other mega funds right now whose names will make front page appearances in the coming weeks), as it provides the banks with something that so far has been missing. Motive. Because while it may be difficult to prove that Barclays or RBS benefited from Libor manipulation, pandering to a mega client is very, very easy to prove - there is always a trace. It also makes it very easy for the prosecution to include hedge funds, which are just as hated by the general populace as big banks if not more, into what is shaping up as one perfect litigation storm (and distraction from the real culprit here: the global central bank cartel).
Telegraph goes on:
The court filing alleges RBS "received this request without objection". Brevan Howard is not a party to the lawsuit and is not being investigated or sued for any alleged wrongdoing. RBS and Brevan Howard both declined to comment.
Mr Tan claimed in his filing that Scott Nygaard, head of short-term markets finance at RBS, knew about the call from Brevan Howard. However, the filing contained no further details to support his allegations. However, he is reported to have said he would provide further evidence at a later stage.
The legal case follows Mr Tan's firing in December over allegations he had attempted to improperly influence RBS's Libor-setting staff between 2007 and 2011. Mr Tan, who worked for RBS in Singapore as head of delta trading, claims he was wrongfully dismissed by the bank.
Ah yes our old friends: the ubiquitous Delta Traders who somehow have a finger in everything from ETF trading, to gamma, to convexity trades, and now- serving as the nexus between Libor manipulation demanding clients and in house Libor fixers.
The plot just gets thicker and thicker.
Mr Tan is claiming $1.5m (£943,000) in bonuses and 3.3m RBS shares that he says the bank owes him in pay. He claims in his lawsuit that asking for changes in Libor was "common practice" among RBS traders and that the bank "took requests from clients" to alter the rate.
And there it is: "Took requests from clients" not just manipulated rates for its own interest. And this is where the universe of guilty parties explodes exponentially, and reaches not only Geneva Switzerland, but virtually every single hedge fund that had even a modest fixed income trading link over the past decade.
Watch this space closely: it will get very hot soon.
end
The mayor of Baltimore is taking on the Libor crooks and will sue for millions!!!
(courtesy the London Guardian) and special thanks to Don Jack for providing...
HEADLINE: 'We are not afraid' ... US mayor suing for millions over Libor
BYLINE: Dominic Rushe New York
BODY:
A little over two years ago Stephanie Rawlings-Blake had never heard of Libor. The mayor of Baltimore had other things to keep her occupied. Elected in 2010, she was dealing with the aftermath of a financial crisis that had left her city with a budget deficit of $120m (£76m) and the cost of cleaning up the worst two-day snow storm in the city's history. And then she found out the credit crunch had come back to take another bite out of the city's finances.
Baltimore is lead plaintiff in a class action suit which alleges that banks including Barclays, Bank of America, HSBC, JP Morgan and UBS conspired to fix a set of key interest rates - the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) - and cost the city millions in the process. So far the Libor scandal has played out mostly under the radar in the US. But now the affair is gaining traction in Washington and Baltimore's lawsuit is putting a human face on a scandal legal experts predict could end up being the most costly of the credit crisis. Rawlings-Blake claims firemen, services for the elderly, school programmes and more are being cut as a direct result of the bankers' actions.
According to the court documents Baltimore bought "tens of millions of dollars' worth of interest rate swaps" during the period when the alleged fixing took place. The suit alleges that between August 2007 and May 2010 the defendants conspired to suppress Libor below the levels at which it would have been set had they accurately reported their borrowing costs. Those manipulations had "severe adverse consequences" for Baltimore and others, according to the suit. Other US cities are watching carefully.
Baltimore had no choice but to fight, said Rawlings-Blake. "We are faced with closing fire companies, recreational centres, we have services that have been cut year after year, services that people depend on. Opportunities for young people, cleanliness of the city, everything is affected by the budget. We can't afford to leave money on the table."
The city has a reputation for taking on the banks. This month Wells Fargo settled a suit launched by the city four years ago that alleged it discriminated against black and Latino mortgage borrowers.
"It's certainly disappointing and I understand why a lot of people have lost a lot of trust and faith in the financial institutions. They are pretty much playing fast and loose with the people they are meant to protect," she said.
"We stand up for ourselves. One thing about Baltimore is that we are not afraid of a fight. There are too many needs we have in this city."
But this case looks set to put all others in the shade. Policymakers around the world are calling for an overhaul of the Libor system, which underpins $500trn of contracts globally - everything from home loans to arcane derivatives.
Stephen Bainbridge, a professor of law at the University of California, said the case was "one of the worst examples of abuse of trust that I can remember in 25 years of following corporate governance". Given the scale of Libor's influence, he said this could emerge as "the defining financial scandal of the meltdown".
Bainbridge believes the US justice department may build an anti-trust case against those involved that could ultimately lead to a settlement as large as that agreed in the US's massive suit against the tobacco industry. Anti-trust laws allow damages to be tripled for those convicted of collusion.
But he believes a suit such as Baltimore's may be harder to prove. The city's lawyers will have to prove direct "loss causation" - that bankers fixing rates in London directly hit Baltimore's account balance. "Proving that chain of events can be difficult," said Bainbridge.
Baltimore city solicitor George Nilson, however, said he was confident there was a good case to answer. He pointed out that the process of discovery - when the city gets hold of internal emails and documents from the bank - had not even started yet.
Nilson said his one fear was that just as some banks were too big to fail, this could be a case that was "too big to try".
Captions:
Stephanie Rawlings-Blake said services in Baltimore had closed because of the Libor scandal Photograph: Gail Burton/AP
LOAD-DATE: July 19, 2012.
(as an aside, I am sure the good folks over at Birmingham Alabama also have their sites fixated on our Libor crooks)
end
Yesterday, an Italian prosecutor is setting his eyes on the Euribor fixing:
(courtesy Dow Jones international news) and special thanks to Don Jack for providing this to me
HEADLINE: Italian Prosecutor Said to Open Probe Into Euribor Fixing
BODY:
ROME--An Italian court has begun a probe into possible manipulation of the Euribor, a benchmark interest rate for an array of financial products, two Italian consumer lobbies said Friday.
Michele Ruggiero, a prosecutor in the southern town of Trani, has opened a criminal probe into potential market-rigging and fraud through manipulation of the Euribor rate, Federconsumatori said on its website.
Federconsumatori and Adusbef recently filed a complaint to the Trani court. Adusbef, another consumer rights lobby, said Italian mortgage holders had suffered at least 3 billion euros ($3.7 billion) in losses due to manipulation of the Euribor rate.
Mr. Ruggiero has ordered Italy's tax police to gather relevant documents and has set up a team of experts to conduct the probe, Federconsumatori said.
Mr. Ruggiero is also leading a criminal probe into alleged misconduct by major rating agencies, all of which have downgraded Italy's sovereign credit rating in the past year.
Write to Christopher Emsden at chris.emsden@dowjones.com
Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires [ 20-07-12 0914GMT ]
NOTES:
PUBLISHER: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
LOAD-DATE: July 20, 2012
end
Now, Wall Street is set to attack its own as those who did not set the rates attack their fellow brethren.
(courtesy Ed Steer and Bloomberg)
Feeding Frenzy Seen If Wall Street Sues Itself Over Libor
Wall Street, grappling with mounting regulatory probes and investor claims over alleged interest-rate manipulation, may face yet another formidable foe: Itself.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley are among financial firms that may bring lawsuits against their biggest rivals as regulators on three continents examine whether other banks manipulated the London interbank offered rate, known as Libor, said Bradley Hintz, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. Even if Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley forgo claims on their own behalf, they oversee money-market funds that may be required to pursue restitution for injured clients, he said.
Because Libor is based on submissions from only some of the world’s largest banks, the probes threaten to pit firms uninvolved in setting the rate against any implicated in its manipulation, Hintz said. Libor serves as a benchmark for at least $360 trillion in securities.
Yes, it will certainly be interesting to watch this all unfold. This Bloomberg offering was posted on their website late yesterday afternoon...and I thank West Virginia reader Elliot Simon for bringing it to our attention. It's certainly worth reading...and the link is here.
end
There is another big Financial times article for you to red written by Patrick Jenkins and Caroline Binham of Bloomberg. It was published in the London Financial times where it was reported that the UK's FSA is stepping up its probe on the Libor scandal.
It seems that the key player is Barclay's Philip Moryoussef who was the centre of things as he received and manipulated the rates basically from the Singapore hub. The article suggests that the 3 other kingpins that we identified for you on Thursday were:
i) Michael Zrihen of Credit Agricole. he has been removed from trading by his new employer.
ii) Didier Sander of HSBC iii) Christian Bittar of Deutsche Bank.
you will recall that Deutsche Bank turned in state's evidence so that they are basically immune to prosecution.
I have the article and I will try to copy and paste this important article for you onto my commentary today.
end
The rats are fleeing a sinking ship!!
(courtesy zero hedge)
Scandal At The IMF: Senior Economist Resigns, Says "Ashamed To Have Had Any Association With Fund At All"
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 14:58 -0400
The rats everywhere are now jumping furiously off the titanic, but few had taken the time to write a letter explaining in detail just how broken the Titanic was just as it was sinking This has now changed, with the departure of Peter Doyle, formerly a division chief in the IMF’s European Department responsible for non-crisis countries and currently an adviser to the Fund. Not content with quietly slinking off the scandal ridden organization which has become the butt of all jokes in the international community, where humor about Lagarde's Louis Vuitton panhandling bag is as pervasive as punchlines about just how incompetent the organization is at actually doing its duty, Doyle has penned the following scathing letter which tears down every myth about the IMF: from its impartiality, to the selection process of its head, to its effectiveness. The letter also contains the following gem: "After twenty years of service, I am ashamed to have had any association with the Fund at all." Pretty much says it all. This is a scandal in the making, and one which may shake to the core the credibility of the IMF in the context of international organization.
Full letter (pdf)
European Department
Washington DC
June 18, 2012
To Mr. Shaalan, Dean of the IMF Executive Board
Today, I addressed the Executive Board for the last time—because I am leaving the Fund.
Accordingly, I wanted first to formally express my deep appreciation to the Swedish, Israeli, and Danish authorities with whom I have worked recently, as well as all others with whom I have worked earlier, for their extraordinary generosity towards me personally.
But I also wanted to take this opportunity to explain my departure.
After twenty years of service, I am ashamed to have had any association with the Fund at all.
This is not solely because of the incompetence that was partly chronicled by the OIA report into the global crisis and the TSR report on surveillance ahead of the Euro Area crisis. More so, it is because the substantive difficulties in these crises, as with others, were identified well in advance but were suppressed here. Given long gestation periods and protracted international decision-making processes to head off both these global challenges, timely sustained warnings were of the essence. So the failure of the Fund to issue them is a failing of the first order, even if such warnings may not have been heeded. The consequences include suffering (and risk of worse to come) for many including Greece, that the second global reserve currency is on the brink, and that the Fund for the past two years has been playing catch-up and reactive roles in the last-ditch efforts to save it.
Further, the proximate factors which produced these failings of IMF surveillance—analytical risk aversion, bilateral priority, and European bias—are, if anything, becoming more deeply entrenched, notwithstanding initiatives which purport to address them. This fact is most clear in regard to appointments for Managing Director which, over the past decade, have all-too-evidently been disastrous. Even the current incumbent is tainted, as neither her gender, integrity, or élan can make up for the fundamental illegitimacy of the selection process. In a hierarchical place like this, the implications of those choices filter directly to others in senior management, and via the appointments, fixed term contracts, and succession planning of senior staff, they go on to infuse the organization as a whole, overwhelming everything else. A handicapped Fund, subject to those proximate roots of surveillance failure, is what the Executive Board prefers. Would that I had understood twenty years ago that this would be the choice.
There are good salty people here. But this one is moving on. You might want to take care not to lose the others.
cc. Ms. Nemat Shafik
Mr. Stanley Fischer
Mr. Stephan Ingves
Mr. Benny Andersen
Mr. Alex Gibbs
Mr. Eric Meyer
Mr. Amit Friedman
Mr. Martin Holmberg
Mr. Reza Moghadam
Mr. Mark Plant
Mr. Brad McDonald
end
I will leave you today with this offering from Wolf Richter on the hopeless plight of Southern Europe:
(courtesy Wolf Richter)
“Southern Europe Does Almost Nothing—Except Complain”
Submitted by testosteronepit on 07/20/2012 19:55 -0400
- Bulgaria
- default
- Eastern Europe
- European Central Bank
- Eurozone
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
- International Monetary Fund
- National Debt
- Recession
- Reserve Currency
- Unemployment
- World Bank
Wolf Richter www.testosteronepit.com
“While Eastern Europe is largely implementing the necessary reforms, Southern Europe does almost nothing—except complain,” said Bulgarian Finance Minister Simeon Djankov in aninterview, a withering blast aimed at neighboring Greece.
And in Greece, “The risk of bankruptcy is still existent,” saidFotis Kouvelis, the leader of Democratic Left, smallest of the three parties in the coalition government. His way of reminding the bailout Troika—the EU, the European Central Bank (ECB), and the IMF—to open the money spigot all the way, or else! The Troika inspectors are scheduled to return to Athens next week to have another look [read.... Greece Flails About, Troika Inspectors Paint “Awful Picture,” Merkel Draws A Line, German Industry & Voters Back Her: It’s Almost Over For Greece].
In September, armed with the inspectors’ final report, the Troika will decide whether or not to make the next bailout payment to Greece. If the decision is no, Greece will default and most likely return to the drachma.
“We demand an extension,” Kouvelis said, summarizing eloquently the strategy since the June elections. Instead of implementing with fiendish dedication the reforms that the prior government had agreed to in exchange for the second bailout package, the new government insists on renegotiating those reforms and then delaying those renegotiated reforms, while insisting on the continuous flow of other people’s billions. He complained about the recession, and that therefore structural reforms couldn’t be implemented.
But neighboring Bulgaria is one of the EU’s fastest growing economies. It has the second lowest national debt of all EU countries and even sports a budget surplus. Individual and corporate income tax rates are 10%. And it’s one of only three EU countries in compliance with the financial stability criteria in the Maastricht treaty. The very criteria that were supposed to have prevented the debt crisis ravaging the Eurozone. So the fiscal union treaty, pushed through by Chancellor Angela Merkel but hung up in the German Constitutional Court, is supposed to accomplish the same thing that the Maastricht treaty already failed to accomplish: force countries to obey limits on deficits and debt.
But Bulgaria has been in compliance, in part due to Djankov, who became Finance Minister in 2009, after a 14-year stint at the World Bank. When asked if his country, still one of the poorest in the EU, wasn’t balancing its budget at the expense of the people, he said: “That is a false and dangerous contradiction that the Southern Europeans recently added to the debate. Countries like Germany, Finland, or also Bulgaria have growing economies and still adhere to the deficit rules. Balanced budgets and growth are not a contradiction. Prerequisite is that the necessary reforms are implemented.”
Spain has been trying to do that. But people resist. With unemployment at 24.4%, their government on the brink of financial doom, and their banks collapsing, Spaniards have turned to protests. Yesterday, firefighters were on the forefront. While some battled the police, others protested tongue in cheek, and with a good laugh, making their point with perfect visual clarity—and with a lot of bare skin. Read.... Naked Firefighters Protest Salary Cuts (VIDEO - they use their hands or helmets to cover up their equipment).
And in Greece, reforms just aren’t implemented. Even the privatization of bloated state-owned enterprises is bogged down. 28 projects by 2015: electricity provider DEI, the postal service, airports, railroads, ports, hospitals.... For €19 billion, an amount that keeps shrinking. But this year, only two projects are on the list: the national lottery and the former International Center of the Olympic Press, a mere building.
And so, Costas Mitropoulos, the frustrated CEO of the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund, which was put in place a year ago to implement the privatizations, resigned. “The newly elected government has not given the support needed,” Mitropoulos wrote in his letter of resignation. “Instead, they have indirectly yet systematically reduced the prestige and credibility in the eyes of potential investors.”
And the argument that Bulgaria has an advantage over Greece because it has its own currency doesn’t hold water. After losing value at an exponential rate, the lev was pegged to the Deutsche Mark in 1999 at 1:1 and then to the euro at the DM’s conversion rate. And the peg has held! Alas, Bulgaria was scheduled to adopt the euro by January 1, 2012. A deadline that came and went. So was Djankov hesitating to adopt the euro? “Hesitating?” he said. “More than that. We put the process on ice. We first want to see what the future rules of the Eurozone look like.”
If it sticks around. In December 2001, when I was in Germany on business, bank showcases were filled with feel-good euro agitprop. Euros would enter circulation on January 1, and this was part of the campaign to persuade Germans to surrender their Deutsche Marks. Some were apprehensive, but my business contacts were gleeful: the euro would become the dominant reserve currency, and oil would be priced in it! Read....Now Even Counterfeiters Are Giving up on the Euro.
I wish you all to have a grand weekend. I will catch up with you Monday night.
all the best
Harvey
2. Sprott silver fund (PSLV): Premium to NAV rose to 3.26% to NAV July 21 2012 :
3. Sprott gold fund (PHYS): premium to NAV rose to 2.91% positive to NAV July 19.2012). .
Finally, we are now starting to see premiums return to the Sprott silver fund. No doubt, in 3 to 4 weeks we will be back to previous premium levels as inventories around the world deplete in silver. The fact that Sprott removed 250 million dollars worth of silver is a dagger to our bankers.
end
Gold COT Report - Futures
Large Speculators
Commercial
Total
Long
Short
Spreading
Long
Short
Long
Short
180,474
51,515
32,493
162,570
321,389
375,537
405,397
Change from Prior Reporting Period
-1,682
-4,406
2,261
-829
5,224
-250
3,079
Traders
151
64
80
46
42
231
165
Small Speculators
Long
Short
Open Interest
55,780
25,920
431,317
1,713
-1,616
1,463
non reportable positions
Change from the previous reporting period
COT Gold Report - Positions as of
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
In our Gold COT report:
Our large speculators:
Those large speculators that have been long in gold pitched 1682 contracts from their long side.
Those large speculators that have been short in gold covered a rather large 4406 contracts.
Our commercials:
Those commercials that have been long in gold pitched a very small 829 contracts.
Those commercials that have been short in gold added a very large 5224 contracts to their short side.
Our small specs:
Those small specs that have been long in gold added another 1713 contracts to their long side
Those small specs that have been short in gold covered 1616 contracts from their short side.
Conclusion:
slightly more bearish and thus an explanation as to why the bankers were trying to whack gold on Wednesday, Thursday and yesterday but failed.
Silver COT Report: Futures
Large Speculators
Commercial
Long
Short
Spreading
Long
Short
28,431
20,775
24,156
48,214
63,349
-3
1,123
-2,128
-157
871
Traders
58
47
46
38
34
Small Speculators
Open Interest
Total
Long
Short
121,819
Long
Short
21,018
13,539
100,801
108,280
-2
-2,156
-2,290
-2,288
-134
non reportable positions
Positions as of:
123
107
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
© SilverSeek.com
And now for our silver COT:
It seems that the players have vacated the silver arena:
Those large specs that have been long in silver pitched a minuscule 3 contracts from their long side.
Those large specs that have been short in silver added a tiny 1123 contracts to their short side.
Those commercials that are long in silver and close to the physical scene pitched a tiny 157 contracts from their long side.
Those commercials that have been perennially short in silver and subject to the silver CFTC probe, added another 871 contracts to their short side.
Small specs:
Those small specs that have long in silver pitched a very tiny 2 contracts from their long side.
Those small specs that have been short in silver covered 2156 contracts from their short side.
Conclusion:
it looks like the rats are leaving the ship!!
The following is a review of gold trading Thursday night from Europe and Asia with commentaries
from Goldcore.
(courtesy Goldcore)
Gold Q2, 2012 - Investment Statistics And Commentary
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 12:09 -0400
- Bridgewater
- British Pound
- Budget Deficit
- China
- Debt Ceiling
- Dubai
- Eurozone
- Global Economy
- Hong Kong
- India
- International Monetary Fund
- Monetary Policy
- Precious Metals
- Recession
- Reuters
- Ron Paul
- Swiss Franc
- Twitter
- United Kingdom
- Volatility
- World Gold Council
- Yen
Submitted by GoldCore
Gold Q2, 2012 - Investment Statistics And Commentary
Today's AM fix was USD 1,583.00, EUR 1,291.30, and GBP 1,007.83 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,580.00, EUR 1,287.06 and GBP 1,009.33 per ounce.
Silver is trading at $27.07/oz, €22.22/oz and £17.32/oz. Platinum is trading at $1,418.25/oz, palladium at $577.80/oz and rhodium at $1,190/oz.
Gold rose $3.70 or 0.23% in New York yesterday and closed at $1,581.00/oz. It rose as high as $1,590/oz prior to determined selling which saw gold fall. Gold ticked higher in Asia prior to falling soon after the European open.
Gold has been trading in a range between $1,530/oz and $1,630/oz for nearly 2 months despite the Eurozone debt crisis entering its 3rd year and looking set to escalate and despite signs that the US economy is on the verge of a sharp recession.
These two factors alone mean that gold will likely resume its upward march due to continuing safe haven demand. The likelihood of further QE from the Fed will be icing on the cake for gold and silver.
US data yesterday showed factory activity shrunk in July for a 3rd consecutive month and the jobless claims rose last week.
Those who continue to put “lipstick on the pig” that is the US economy are lulling themselves and other unfortunates into another false sense of security.
“Blue skies thinking” regarding individual economies and the global economy got us into this mess and it will not get us out.
The World Gold Council have just published their commentary on gold’s price performance in various currencies, its volatility statistics and correlation to other assets in the quarter -
It provides macroeconomic context to the investment statistics published at the end of each quarter and highlights emerging themes relevant to gold’s future development.
One of their key findings is that gold will act as hedge against possible coming dollar weakness and gold will act as a "currency hedge in the international monetary system."
Key findings of the World Gold Council’s report:
Review: Key Macroeconomic Themes During Q2 2012
Gold prices declined in most currencies during the second quarter with the exception of the euro, Swiss franc and Indian rupee, in part due to a strong US dollar. Despite a 3.8% decline in Q2 to US$1,598.50/oz on the London PM fix, gold was up 4.4% during the first half of the year. Volatility remained elevated amidst a busy event-risk period. However, gold generally outperformed risk assets.
Global inflation eases but underlying trends supportive for gold: A substantial drop in energy and some agricultural commodities during the period has eased inflation pressures in many parts of the world and put downward pressure on gold prices.
Reassessing “risk-free” assets: Even assets traditionally considered safe are under pressure. German Bunds interest rates climbed in June. The Swiss franc, yen and US Treasuries are also facing issues – challenging their role as assets of last resort. Despite pressures on the price of gold, its lack of credit risk, its liquidity and hedging characteristics has made gold an attractive vehicle for long-term wealth preservation.
Correlation between gold and risk assets approaches long-term averages: Gold’s correlation to equities and other risk assets fell towards long-run average levels in Q2 helping portfolio diversification. Gold’s increased correlation to equities in Q1 was an indirect effect related to a weaker global economy coupled with a stronger US dollar.
Outlook: Emerging Macroeconomic Themes In H2 2012
Deflationary concerns in some countries provide room for further fiscal and monetary stimulus. This may lead to a further debasement of currencies through unconventional monetary policy and an increased risk of future inflation. These factors should provide support for future gold investment.
The underlying structural issues that affect the euro zone remain unresolved, despite advances in the formation of more comprehensive burden-sharing mechanisms. In such an environment of uncertainty and higher market volatility, gold will continue to be an asset that investors use to diversify risk and preserve capital.
The flight to the US dollar as a safe-haven in the first half of 2012 could be reversed. The US debt ceiling debate in Q3 and federal elections in November, followed by the necessity to confront a US$1.3tn budget deficit will prove challenging to the US dollar. With most currencies under pressure in one form or another, gold is likely to provide a hedging mechanism for investors
Dr. Constantin Gurdgiev, a non Executive member of theGoldCore Investment Committee, has analysed the Q2, 2012 World Gold Council data and has written a blog post that can be read here or see commentary.
He finds that the report is worth a read as it shows how gold generally outperformed risk assets and helped portfolio diversification.
He warns that safe haven government debt markets have all the hallmarks of “return-free risks” rather than “risk-free returns.”
The World Gold Council’s ‘Quarterly statistics commentary Q2 2012’ can be read here.
(Bloomberg) -- China Plans to Start Interbank Gold Trading on Local Market
China is preparing to introduce an interbank gold-trading system, a move that may enable domestic banks to treat the precious metal as a more liquid asset and increase holdings.
The Shanghai Gold Exchange, the country’s biggest spot market, has been working with the China Foreign Exchange Trade System since the start of the year, Gu Wenshuo, an exchange spokesman, said today. The original plan was for the new system to be running at the end of August, Gu said by phone, adding that details are unavailable as banks are giving feedback.
China has been the largest producer since 2007, and was the biggest user after India last year. An interbank gold-trading system is part of broader reforms that Beijing aims to introduce to make the financial sector more market-driven, according to Jiang Shu, a senior analyst at Industrial Bank Co. Ltd.
“China is already very important in terms of gold production and consumption,” said Jeffrey Rhodes, global head of precious metals in Dubai at INTL FCStone Inc., a New York- based trading and brokerage firm. “If a new interbank market really does flourish, it could put the Chinese market in the mainstream and become world-class.”
Spot gold was 0.2 percent higher at $1,584.65 an ounce at 3:38 p.m. in Shanghai. The metal, which reached a record $1,921.15 in September, has rallied for 11 years on emerging- market and investment demand, as well as central-bank purchases.
Gold imports by mainland China from Hong Kong reached 314,810 kilograms in the first five months, compared with 39,607.4 kilograms a year ago, according to Bloomberg calculations based on data from the Hong Kong government.
For breaking news and commentary on financial markets and gold, follow us on Twitter.
NEWS
Gold steady on weak U.S. data; dollar weighs – Reuters
Gold advances for second day - MarketWatch
UK housing slump will deepen, warns IMF – The Telegraph
COMMENTARY
Dr Gurdgiev: Q2 Report From The World Gold Council – True Economics
China’s Coming Assault on the Western Financial System – The Daily Reckoning
World economy now effectively a multitrillion-dollar game of chicken – Resource Clips
LBMA's gold price fixing scheme about to collapse, London trader tells KWN
Submitted by cpowell on Fri, 2012-07-20 19:07. Section: Daily Dispatches
3p ET Friday, July 20, 2012
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
The London trader source of King World News reports today that the nakedness of unallocated and even some supposedly allocated positions in the London bullion market now is being discussed openly and he expects defaults resulting in cash settlement as the prices of gold and silver vault higher. He adds that demand from China is steady and that China has accumulated far more metal than is being reported. An excerpt from the interview is headlined "The LBMA Gold Price Fixing Scheme Is Over" and it's posted at the King World News blog here:
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
end
Jim Sinclair launches operation: Investor's Spring Freedom against our crooked bankers.
He urges us to approach mining CEO's and tell them our concerns at what the big bankers are doing to our economy:
Investor’s Spring–Freedom!
My Dear Extended Family,
Investor’s Spring. Freedom at last!
You know that I have spent a good part of my life in an attempt to better understand the human experience looking for purpose. I would like to share with you a short conversation I had with Sai Baba in India in 1986. He said to me "What would you do if I made you a warrior?" The room was full of spiritually liberal people. I answered "make great war." There was a collective gasp by the attendees. Sai Baba said, "Right Answer, Sinclair."
Nobody wants war, but if it comes your way, and is your duty to pursue, it must be done, and done well. This war has been brought to us by those that would profit by destruction in clear violation of common commercial code.
These demons do not just short a situations based on a premise and await profit.
They pound mercilessly on the bids, seeking to depress the price.
They sell short the shares index and other funds buy as a means to get large numbers.
They immediately start dirty tricks.
They turn you in to regulatory bodies in the area of your trading and in the country of your operation on constructed nonsense.
They seek authors to write negative articles from their imagination to insult your integrity as a company not only where you work, but also where you trade.
They pay people to adopt a multitude of nicknames to post horrific lies about you personally and your company on chat boards.
They have a trading campaign to sell every instance of good news you have.
They have a trading campaign to sell your positive closes within the last 30 seconds of the trading day.
They enter orders with brokers who know what they want to happen in sizes larger than the total average daily trading to sell at the market on the close of Fridays.
They trade other exchange listed shares on the NASDAQ out of line with the listed close to skew the closing prices to the negative.
They actually paint the charts with their trading to make your situation less attractive technically.
These are only a few of the standard dirty tricks they execute in order to profit from these illegal acts to profit from the short which is the fruit of their crimes.
Their offense is violation of common commercial code. The short is simply the means of illicit profits. I do not intend to preach to you, but rather lead by example.
Your job is to get the attention first of those that are the management and directors of the companies you invest in that have been manipulated. You may have to be strong in order to accomplish this.
I am obligated in my corporate position to defend the company to the limit of my ability. I am obligated to say no, not on my watch. I am obligated to use all means, including litigation, to protect capital value on behalf of the investors. If I failed to do that I would be liable to you. This is true of every investment you have, not only precious metals shares.
Step one of "Investor’s Spring, Freedom" is to raise hell with the management and directors of your investments to take action to protect your interests from illegal and unethical activities. Tell them remedy exists in common commercial code moreso than securities laws.
I will let you know what I am doing as I do it. I will lead other companies to protect you by example.
It is up to you to do one simple thing. Wake up this bunch of brain dead office decorations, professional campers and rock hounds and get them to follow me in my march forward.
Respectfully,
Jim
end
Our friends over at the Silverdoctors.com web site has released the audio of the interview with Bill Murphy of GATA with respect to his London source. As a reminder, this London trader's views on what will happen have been 100% accurate over these past several years. The London trader believes that silver will explode in August.
Will it be because of the CFTC ruling that will be coming? Do not know, but something big is going to happen.
Listen...
10,276
end
Overnight in Europe we witnessed the risk is off trade with all Asian and European bourses in the red. The Euro/USA cross proceeded south and at 8 am est was trading at 1.2234. All eyes were on Spain with respect to the terms of what it will receive for its banking rescue. If you will recall, 30 billion euros was to come by the end of July. Markets were waiting for official news on this and on new terms. Loans will be forthcoming once stress tests on the banks in question commence.
The 10 yr Spanish bond yield again traded wider at 7.11%, with the Italian 10 year bond yield rising above the 6% level trading at 6.10%
(your overnight sentiment from Europe, courtesy zero hedge 8.am est Friday morning)
Overnight Sentiment: Europe Threatens Market Surreality Again
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 07:08 -0400
It is a quiet session so far with risk in the Off position (for now - we have yet to see the sinusoid HFT stop triggering function which rises stocks artificially as yesterday demonstrated so very well to nobody's surprise). All eyes are once again focusing to Europe, pushing the EURUSD lower for at least a few more hours until Europe closes and the repatriation resumes. In terms of key European events, today is the EU finance minister’s conference call on Spain today. As DB summarizes, officials are expected to approve the EU100 billion Spanish bank rescue plan however the exact size of the loan will probably only be determined in September pending the result of a bank-by-bank stress test. This will then pave way for restructuring plans for the sector in October which is broadly consistent with the timeline set out in the leaked draft MoU. At the previous meeting finance ministers agreed to first disburse EU30bn to Spain by the end of July so we will watch out for further confirmation of this today. We may also get the terms of the loan today. The conference call is expected to start at 10am GMT. What is odd is that unlike before when the mere possibility of a European catalyst was enough to push risk higher, this is no longer the case, and Spanish spreads to Bunds just hit another all time wide, with the Spanish 10 Year plunging to 7.11%, another post-summit high, this time dragging the Italian 10 Year which was at 6.10% at last check. And as explained before, the European uber pair trade means that as PIIGS yields soar, the core drops to new record, in most cases, negative nominal lows.
Will the world once again be able to ignore the once-again imploding European reality (and American: Of the 35 S&P 500 firms that reported results yesterday, about 74% of those came ahead of market consensus but only 57% of those topped sales forecasts.), and send the ES to a green close on the day? Or is today the day when reality comes back with a vengeance? Stay tuned and find out.
end
Opening Spanish 10 yr yield at 8 am est:
SPANISH GOVERNMENT GENERIC BONDS - 10 YR NOTE
Add to Portfolio
GSPG10YR:IND
7.100000.08900 1.27%
Your opening Italian 10 yr bond yield: (8 am est)
Italy Govt Bonds 10 Year Gross Yield
Add to Portfolio
GBTPGR10:IND
6.066000.06500 1.08%
As of 07:40:00 ET on 07/20/2012.
end
In the following video, Stratfor's Adrian Bosoni highlights the fundamental contradictions and the major flaw in the European financial crisis. We see that ECB board member Asmussen, and German minister Schaeuble both steadfastly state that there will be no money transfer without a sovereignty (fiscal) transfer. Bosoni states correctly that this is the proper way to proceed on a long term basis in order to have a robust and unified budgetary regime. The flaw: the length of time to ratify this. Spain, Portugal, and Greece all have very short time horizons due to their massive problems and all have asked for a delay in implementing a balancing of their budgetary deficits. In other words, the PIIGS nations are asking for continual bailouts with the hope that they will get their act together.
the video is a must see as it gives a terrific review of the problems facing Spain and other PIIGS nations. This was released a few hours before the Valencia announcement.The video is 3 1/2 minutes.
(courtesy, Bosoni/Stratfor/zero hedge)
Europe's Fundamental Flaw Resurfaces
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/19/2012 19:54 -0400
"Two weeks after a summit that promised to bring solutions to the European financial crisis, the European Union has once again revealed its fundamental contradictions" is how Stratfor's Adrian Bosoni introduces a succinct clip on the reality the European leaders faced once they arrived home after that strenuous weekend of blithering. Between Asmussen and Schaeuble who have steadfastly stuck to the no-monetary-transfer-without-sovereign-transfer tack - which actually make a fair amount of sense on a long-term basis - a robust and unified budgetary regime is precisely what Europe has lacked. Unfortunately, Bosoni notes, "even in a best case scenario this could not be achieved before 2015" thanks to treaties, referenda, and ratifications. In a little over 3 minutes, the analyst outlines exactly what is holding it back and why the short-term is all they have as budgetary discipline is proving particularly difficult for the EU members to maintain (see more Spanish riots tonight). Between Spain's delays in meeting targets, Greece's 'impossible' budgetary goals, Ireland's demands for concessions, and Finland's collateral agreement with Spain, unifying anything over there seems impractical and impossible.
A must watch for the quickest summary of the state of Europe - and the best explanation of the reality to which European credit markets are cracking as opposed to the nominal price of global equities leaking higher...
Valencia Announces SOS, Needs To Tap Government LIquidity Support Just Eurogroup Accepts Spanish Bailout Plan
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 07:58 -0400
Just as today's largely expected announcement that the Eurogroup has formally agreed to accept the Spanish bail out (details still lacking), the Spanish region of Valencia just became the second to officially demand a bailout following Catalunya's comparable announcement at the end of May, and has announced it will need to tap the government liquidity mechanism. Kneejerk reaction: EURUSD sharply lower and below 1.22 for the first time in days.
From Reuters:
Spain's heavily indebted eastern region of Valencia said on Friday it would apply for help under the government's 18 billion euro plan passed on Thursday aimed at helping regional finances.
The plan comes with strict conditionality that a region stick to its deficit cutting plans.
Concurrent with this announcement, Spain also announced an update to its deficit projections, whose details are meaningless as they will be revised adversely shortly, which confirmed that the Spanish economy continues to deteriorate at an accelerating pace.
Spanish Stocks Plunge Most In 12 Months As Egan-Jones Cuts Spain To CC+
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 10:50 -0400
With IBEX down 6%, 10Y yields over 7.30%, 10Y spread over 610bps, and EURJPY at 12 year lows; the hits just keep coming. From Ega-Jones:
Slipping - Spain's 10 year debt is now yielding 7.18%, which is a reflection of the weakening of the economy and the credit quality of Spain. In addition to the expected austerity riots, the latest news is that Valencia and other regions will need $15B of aid, the sen. debtholders of the weak banks will be forced to take losses, and there might be some sharing of losses among all banks. An estimated decline in GDP of 1.7% (per the Economy Ministry), the 25% unemployment, the IIF's recent estimate of addl bank loan losses up to EUR260B, and possible depositor withdrawals hurt. From 2008 to 2011, Spain's debt mushroomed from EUR436B to EUR735B while its GDP declined from EUR1.09T to EUR1.07T. Social benefits are a major problem; while pmts to the govt have been more or less flat over the past four years (up EUR 3B), payments from the government have been up EUR 45B. As a result, Spain is short about EUR50B per year for social payments, EUR20B per year for interest, and an additional EUR 20B for asset growth; hence the EUR90B per annum increase in debt.
Spain will inevitably be faced with addl pmts to support a portion its banking sector and for its weaker provinces. Assets of Spain's largest two banks exceed its GDP. We are slipping our rating to "CC+"; watch for more requests for support from the banks and money creation.
via Bloomberg.
Europe Ends In A Sea Of Red
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 11:47 -0400
Spain's broad equity index suffered its second largest single-day drop in almost 4 years and Italy also tumbled almost 5% as everything European was sold hard. EuroStoxx (the broad Dow equivalent) is down almost 3% as EURUSD dropped to two year lows, EURJPY to 12 year lows. AAA safe havens were massively bid with Germany, Denmark, and Switzerland all to new low (negative) rate closes. Core equity markets did suffer though with Germany down 2% but it was the periphery that saw the damage in credit-land with Spain 10Y closing at 7.27%, 610bps over Bunds (and 5Y CDS over 605bps). Spanish spreads are +130bps from post-Summit (and pre-Summit) and Italy +78bps, but it is the front-end of the curve that is most worrisome - Spain's 2Y is 132bps wider in the last week. Europe's VIX exploded by over 4 vols to 24%today and once again looks decidedly high relative to US VIX.
Spain and Italy surging to as bad a performance as Portugal...post Summit...
but it is the front-end that is a disaster! This is where all the LTRO debt is being held that was put on as part of the Sarkozy carry trade - ECB margin calls here we come!!
but while this is apples to apple-like things comparisons, the difference between credit and equity market reactions post Summit remain remarkable...(though today saw a pretty decent turnaround)...
and broadly European stocks were hammered today as hope fades...
charts: Bloomberg
end
From the USA side of things, Bruce Krasting weighs in on Schumer's choice of words to Bernanke this week: " get to work, Mr Bernanke"
The Fed will have another FOMB meeting on August 1.
It is there that they will decide on the following;
1. Do nothing
ii) Extend ZIRP to 2014
iii) Announce another QEIII of say 250- 600 billion dollars
iv) Cut the deposit rate from 1/4% to 1/8%
Krasting believes it will be the latter and he gives his reasons why.
Also the consequences of that action.
(a must read)
Bernanke - Post Schumer Gaffe
Submitted by Bruce Krasting on 07/20/2012 08:59 -0400
- Ben Bernanke
- Bond
- China
- Copper
- CRAP
- European Central Bank
- Fail
- Finland
- Germany
- India
- Monetary Policy
- Ron Paul
- Switzerland
- Yield Curve
I'm adding myself to the long list of folks who have commented on NY Senator Chuck Schumer's choice of words to Bernanke the other day:
.
.
.
Schumer is a political hack. He wants the Fed to do ‘something’ today that would give the economy a lift heading into the election. Chuck knows that the Legislative side can’t/won’t do a thing before November, so he begs Ben to light another monetary fire to help the Democratic cause. Chucky boy is an ass.
I doubt that Bernanke listens to the noise from Senators very often, but Chuck’s words got a lot of press. I'm wondering what Ben is thinking. Schumer has brought politics into the outcome of the August 1st Fed meeting. Whatever Ben decides to do, he will be accused of partisan politics.
There are many scenarios for the August Fed meeting:
.
I) Do nothing
.
Arguments For:
a) The economy stinks, but it is not in a crisis. More “crisis monetary measures” are not justified.
b) With the 10-year already at 1.5%, the Fed can’t accomplish anything by pushing rates a few basis points lower.
Arguments Against:
The election and related political considerations will absolutely tie the Feds hands after the August meeting. The next chance for the Fed to “do something” will be in late November. If Bernanke wants to buy some insurance, he has to do something in August.
.
II) Extend the ZIRP language past 2014
.
Arguments For:
I can’t think of any.
Arguments Against.
Because there is no substance to this, there is a very strong likely hood that the markets will take a few seconds, and then puke. Bernanke knows this. He doesn’t want to lay an egg.
.
III) QE3 – $600B LSAP targeted to Agency Mortgage Bonds
.
Arguments For:
a) This is what the market wants to see. Failure to do QE3 will disappoint, Ben does not want to disappoint.
b) This a is “populist” approach. Ben can say that he is doing his best to allow homeowners to ReFi and prospective buyers to get a record low rate.
Arguments Against:
a) This is an “all in bet”. Even Bernanke has been questioning the efficacy of additional QE of late.
b) Senator Shelby and Speaker Boehner will say, “The Fed is printing money to play politics!”
c) Bernanke’s critics will go wild.
d) There is absolutely no certainty that another big LSAP will do a damn thing.
.
IV) QE3 - $250B LSAP targeted to Agency Mortgage Bonds
Arguments For:
A small QE would create less political backlash. Ben could argue that he is being “moderate” and will, as always, be willing to do more if this modest monetary “bump” proves to be inadequate.
Arguments Against:
a) A “half a loaf” is going to fail miserably. Bernanke wants monetary policy to jack up stocks, as he thinks this creates jobs. Stocks would nose dive if this is the result. Bernanke understands this.
b) Both Blues and Reds would be upset. Schumer will be pointing at Bernanke and saying, “He didn’t do his job!” At the same time Ron Paul would be calling for Ben’s head on a platter.
.
V) Something Else – A cut in the deposit rate from a 1/4% to a 1/8%
.
Arguments For:
a) This appears to be a modest step. As such, it would be less susceptible to criticism.
b) The small change in the deposit rate would achieve something that Bernanke has been shooting for a long time.Returns on short-term money would go negative. Three and Six month Bills would certainly be negative. One-year paper would trade around flat.
c) Germany and Switzerland are already in negative territory. Other, smaller bond markets like Finland and Sweden are also in the red. For the US to follow suit would not be that big a surprise. Bernanke could blunt critics by saying he had done less than Europe - an 1/8th in the US versus 0% for the ECB.
d) The change to negative yields, (regardless of how small), will force money to move around. There are trillions in money market funds, Trillions in short term Treasury paper, and trillions more on corporate balance sheets. All of this is now going to be looking at negative returns.
e) With the first rungs of the yield curve in the bucket, the longer maturities would be dragged down. The Ten-year would move toward 1%. This result would be similar to the (hoped for) outcome of a large LSAP.
f) Bernanke could still say, “The Fed has more it could do”, as the deposit rate could be cut again (to zero) at some point.
.
Of these options, I believe that #V has the greatest probability of occurring.
I hope that the Fed sits tight, and does nothing. But that seems unlikely. Bernanke knows that the economy is now decelerating, and that his hands get tied after the August meeting. So“something” is more likely than “nothing”.
It’s hard to predict what might happen if Ben pushes rates into negative territory. It could end up resulting in an orderly market transition from cash, to high-risk securities like stocks and junk bonds. The virtuous cycle of higher stocks leading to higher spending and more jobs might be the result. But I doubt it.
Arguments Against:
a) The knee jerk reaction to negative rates might be positive, but in a short period of time the market will come to realize that negative rates are not going to force people (more) into dividend stocks. Quite the opposite, it will scare the crap out of them.
b) This is not good for the banks (who cares); but the financials are still a big chunk of the S&P.
c) This move will likely cause more “unwanted inflation”. If China or India is faced with negative returns on their reserves, they might be inclined to just buy commodities with the billions of cash they are sitting on. Prices of grains, beans, copper, coal and oil come to mind. Gold would be on the list as well.
d) If three-month bills went from +8bp to -7bp you might think that it wouldn't matter. The change is so small on a relative basis. I think of it as stepping off the edge of a cliff.
The entire global financial system is based on fiat money and the presumption that the money has “value” as a store of wealth. Nearly every action by the Fed over the past few years has led to the debasement of money. In the final stage, the issuers of money debase it to the point where it is no longer desirable to hold. I see the move to negative rates across the globe as a tipping point, one that will be damn hard to reverse once undertaken.
.
.
end
It seems that our Libor rate setters took "requests" from companies to alter their rate so that they could earn big money.
This is getting hotter by the minute:
(courtesy zero hedge)
The Hedge Fund Trail In Liborgate Gets Hotter: Mega Fund Brevan Howard Next?
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 12:55 -0400
- Barclays
- Brevan Howard
- British Bankers' Association
- Convexity
- Exchange Traded Fund
- fixed
- LIBOR
- RBS
- Reality
- Switzerland
Two days ago we made the "missing link" connection between traders in Libor manipulating banks (all of which curiously had a hub in Singapore: something else for the media that has been about 4 years too late on this topic to focus on) and hedge funds (most of which curiously centering on the otherwise sleepy bastion of banking: Geneva, Switzerland). The immediate aftermath was the loss of trading privileges of one Michael Zrihen. We are fairly certain this is just the beginning of the hedge fund bust: when all is said and done, many more funds will have terminated traders they hired for reasons (and kickbacks) unknown over the past 2 years as Lie-bor manipulators sought to put a clean firewalled break between their old employer and current one. Because apparently sometimes the regulators are that stupid and can be confused by a simple job change. And while many have assumed (and even calculated based on completely groundless assumptions) that only BBA member banks have benefited from Libor manipulation, the reality is that hedge funds were just as complicit and benefited just as much if not more. What is worse, they took advantage of their whale client status with manipulating banks, and courtesy of Total Return Swap and other leveraged gimmicks, made far more money when they co-opted two or more banks to do their bidding. Impossible you say: hedge funds would never be so stupid. Oh very possible: we present exhibit A - Brevan Howard, a "fund, with assets of $20.8 billion as of Dec. 31, has never had a losing year and returned 14.4 percent annualized from its April 2003 inception through the end of 2008" as Bloomberg said in a made to order profile of the funds recently. Perhaps there is a very simple reason for this trading perfection: "Brevan Howard telephoned on 20 Aug 2007 to ask the defendant to change the Libor rate," according to a paper filed with the Singapore High Court cited by Bloomberg."
Here is The Telegraph with a smoking gun that was promptly buried in the avalanche of sudden media coverage in the aftermath of the Barclays Liborgate settlement.
Tan Chi Min, a former RBS trader who claims he was wrongfully dismissed by the bank after it fired him for allegedly trying to manipulate Libor - the average rate at which banks lend to each other - said he had received the request in 2007 from Brevan Howard.
"Brevan Howard telephoned on 20 Aug 2007 to ask the defendant to change the Libor rate," according to a paper filed with the Singapore High Court cited by Bloomberg.
Oops.
That one statement should be enough to send shivers into the heart of whoever may be General Counsel of Brevan Howard (and many other mega funds right now whose names will make front page appearances in the coming weeks), as it provides the banks with something that so far has been missing. Motive. Because while it may be difficult to prove that Barclays or RBS benefited from Libor manipulation, pandering to a mega client is very, very easy to prove - there is always a trace. It also makes it very easy for the prosecution to include hedge funds, which are just as hated by the general populace as big banks if not more, into what is shaping up as one perfect litigation storm (and distraction from the real culprit here: the global central bank cartel).
Telegraph goes on:
The court filing alleges RBS "received this request without objection". Brevan Howard is not a party to the lawsuit and is not being investigated or sued for any alleged wrongdoing. RBS and Brevan Howard both declined to comment.
Mr Tan claimed in his filing that Scott Nygaard, head of short-term markets finance at RBS, knew about the call from Brevan Howard. However, the filing contained no further details to support his allegations. However, he is reported to have said he would provide further evidence at a later stage.
The legal case follows Mr Tan's firing in December over allegations he had attempted to improperly influence RBS's Libor-setting staff between 2007 and 2011. Mr Tan, who worked for RBS in Singapore as head of delta trading, claims he was wrongfully dismissed by the bank.
Ah yes our old friends: the ubiquitous Delta Traders who somehow have a finger in everything from ETF trading, to gamma, to convexity trades, and now- serving as the nexus between Libor manipulation demanding clients and in house Libor fixers.
The plot just gets thicker and thicker.
Mr Tan is claiming $1.5m (£943,000) in bonuses and 3.3m RBS shares that he says the bank owes him in pay. He claims in his lawsuit that asking for changes in Libor was "common practice" among RBS traders and that the bank "took requests from clients" to alter the rate.
And there it is: "Took requests from clients" not just manipulated rates for its own interest. And this is where the universe of guilty parties explodes exponentially, and reaches not only Geneva Switzerland, but virtually every single hedge fund that had even a modest fixed income trading link over the past decade.
Watch this space closely: it will get very hot soon.
end
The mayor of Baltimore is taking on the Libor crooks and will sue for millions!!!
(courtesy the London Guardian) and special thanks to Don Jack for providing...
HEADLINE: 'We are not afraid' ... US mayor suing for millions over Libor
BYLINE: Dominic Rushe New York
BODY:
A little over two years ago Stephanie Rawlings-Blake had never heard of Libor. The mayor of Baltimore had other things to keep her occupied. Elected in 2010, she was dealing with the aftermath of a financial crisis that had left her city with a budget deficit of $120m (£76m) and the cost of cleaning up the worst two-day snow storm in the city's history. And then she found out the credit crunch had come back to take another bite out of the city's finances.
Baltimore is lead plaintiff in a class action suit which alleges that banks including Barclays, Bank of America, HSBC, JP Morgan and UBS conspired to fix a set of key interest rates - the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) - and cost the city millions in the process. So far the Libor scandal has played out mostly under the radar in the US. But now the affair is gaining traction in Washington and Baltimore's lawsuit is putting a human face on a scandal legal experts predict could end up being the most costly of the credit crisis. Rawlings-Blake claims firemen, services for the elderly, school programmes and more are being cut as a direct result of the bankers' actions.
According to the court documents Baltimore bought "tens of millions of dollars' worth of interest rate swaps" during the period when the alleged fixing took place. The suit alleges that between August 2007 and May 2010 the defendants conspired to suppress Libor below the levels at which it would have been set had they accurately reported their borrowing costs. Those manipulations had "severe adverse consequences" for Baltimore and others, according to the suit. Other US cities are watching carefully.
Baltimore had no choice but to fight, said Rawlings-Blake. "We are faced with closing fire companies, recreational centres, we have services that have been cut year after year, services that people depend on. Opportunities for young people, cleanliness of the city, everything is affected by the budget. We can't afford to leave money on the table."
The city has a reputation for taking on the banks. This month Wells Fargo settled a suit launched by the city four years ago that alleged it discriminated against black and Latino mortgage borrowers.
"It's certainly disappointing and I understand why a lot of people have lost a lot of trust and faith in the financial institutions. They are pretty much playing fast and loose with the people they are meant to protect," she said.
"We stand up for ourselves. One thing about Baltimore is that we are not afraid of a fight. There are too many needs we have in this city."
But this case looks set to put all others in the shade. Policymakers around the world are calling for an overhaul of the Libor system, which underpins $500trn of contracts globally - everything from home loans to arcane derivatives.
Stephen Bainbridge, a professor of law at the University of California, said the case was "one of the worst examples of abuse of trust that I can remember in 25 years of following corporate governance". Given the scale of Libor's influence, he said this could emerge as "the defining financial scandal of the meltdown".
Bainbridge believes the US justice department may build an anti-trust case against those involved that could ultimately lead to a settlement as large as that agreed in the US's massive suit against the tobacco industry. Anti-trust laws allow damages to be tripled for those convicted of collusion.
But he believes a suit such as Baltimore's may be harder to prove. The city's lawyers will have to prove direct "loss causation" - that bankers fixing rates in London directly hit Baltimore's account balance. "Proving that chain of events can be difficult," said Bainbridge.
Baltimore city solicitor George Nilson, however, said he was confident there was a good case to answer. He pointed out that the process of discovery - when the city gets hold of internal emails and documents from the bank - had not even started yet.
Nilson said his one fear was that just as some banks were too big to fail, this could be a case that was "too big to try".
Captions:
Stephanie Rawlings-Blake said services in Baltimore had closed because of the Libor scandal Photograph: Gail Burton/AP
LOAD-DATE: July 19, 2012.
(as an aside, I am sure the good folks over at Birmingham Alabama also have their sites fixated on our Libor crooks)
end
Yesterday, an Italian prosecutor is setting his eyes on the Euribor fixing:
(courtesy Dow Jones international news) and special thanks to Don Jack for providing this to me
HEADLINE: Italian Prosecutor Said to Open Probe Into Euribor Fixing
BODY:
ROME--An Italian court has begun a probe into possible manipulation of the Euribor, a benchmark interest rate for an array of financial products, two Italian consumer lobbies said Friday.
Michele Ruggiero, a prosecutor in the southern town of Trani, has opened a criminal probe into potential market-rigging and fraud through manipulation of the Euribor rate, Federconsumatori said on its website.
Federconsumatori and Adusbef recently filed a complaint to the Trani court. Adusbef, another consumer rights lobby, said Italian mortgage holders had suffered at least 3 billion euros ($3.7 billion) in losses due to manipulation of the Euribor rate.
Mr. Ruggiero has ordered Italy's tax police to gather relevant documents and has set up a team of experts to conduct the probe, Federconsumatori said.
Mr. Ruggiero is also leading a criminal probe into alleged misconduct by major rating agencies, all of which have downgraded Italy's sovereign credit rating in the past year.
Write to Christopher Emsden at chris.emsden@dowjones.com
Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires [ 20-07-12 0914GMT ]
NOTES:
PUBLISHER: Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
LOAD-DATE: July 20, 2012
end
Now, Wall Street is set to attack its own as those who did not set the rates attack their fellow brethren.
(courtesy Ed Steer and Bloomberg)
Feeding Frenzy Seen If Wall Street Sues Itself Over Libor
Wall Street, grappling with mounting regulatory probes and investor claims over alleged interest-rate manipulation, may face yet another formidable foe: Itself.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley are among financial firms that may bring lawsuits against their biggest rivals as regulators on three continents examine whether other banks manipulated the London interbank offered rate, known as Libor, said Bradley Hintz, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. Even if Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley forgo claims on their own behalf, they oversee money-market funds that may be required to pursue restitution for injured clients, he said.
Because Libor is based on submissions from only some of the world’s largest banks, the probes threaten to pit firms uninvolved in setting the rate against any implicated in its manipulation, Hintz said. Libor serves as a benchmark for at least $360 trillion in securities.
Yes, it will certainly be interesting to watch this all unfold. This Bloomberg offering was posted on their website late yesterday afternoon...and I thank West Virginia reader Elliot Simon for bringing it to our attention. It's certainly worth reading...and the link is here.
end
There is another big Financial times article for you to red written by Patrick Jenkins and Caroline Binham of Bloomberg. It was published in the London Financial times where it was reported that the UK's FSA is stepping up its probe on the Libor scandal.
It seems that the key player is Barclay's Philip Moryoussef who was the centre of things as he received and manipulated the rates basically from the Singapore hub. The article suggests that the 3 other kingpins that we identified for you on Thursday were:
i) Michael Zrihen of Credit Agricole. he has been removed from trading by his new employer.
ii) Didier Sander of HSBC iii) Christian Bittar of Deutsche Bank.
you will recall that Deutsche Bank turned in state's evidence so that they are basically immune to prosecution.
I have the article and I will try to copy and paste this important article for you onto my commentary today.
end
The rats are fleeing a sinking ship!!
(courtesy zero hedge)
Scandal At The IMF: Senior Economist Resigns, Says "Ashamed To Have Had Any Association With Fund At All"
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 14:58 -0400
The rats everywhere are now jumping furiously off the titanic, but few had taken the time to write a letter explaining in detail just how broken the Titanic was just as it was sinking This has now changed, with the departure of Peter Doyle, formerly a division chief in the IMF’s European Department responsible for non-crisis countries and currently an adviser to the Fund. Not content with quietly slinking off the scandal ridden organization which has become the butt of all jokes in the international community, where humor about Lagarde's Louis Vuitton panhandling bag is as pervasive as punchlines about just how incompetent the organization is at actually doing its duty, Doyle has penned the following scathing letter which tears down every myth about the IMF: from its impartiality, to the selection process of its head, to its effectiveness. The letter also contains the following gem: "After twenty years of service, I am ashamed to have had any association with the Fund at all." Pretty much says it all. This is a scandal in the making, and one which may shake to the core the credibility of the IMF in the context of international organization.
Full letter (pdf)
European Department
Washington DC
June 18, 2012
To Mr. Shaalan, Dean of the IMF Executive Board
Today, I addressed the Executive Board for the last time—because I am leaving the Fund.
Accordingly, I wanted first to formally express my deep appreciation to the Swedish, Israeli, and Danish authorities with whom I have worked recently, as well as all others with whom I have worked earlier, for their extraordinary generosity towards me personally.
But I also wanted to take this opportunity to explain my departure.
After twenty years of service, I am ashamed to have had any association with the Fund at all.
This is not solely because of the incompetence that was partly chronicled by the OIA report into the global crisis and the TSR report on surveillance ahead of the Euro Area crisis. More so, it is because the substantive difficulties in these crises, as with others, were identified well in advance but were suppressed here. Given long gestation periods and protracted international decision-making processes to head off both these global challenges, timely sustained warnings were of the essence. So the failure of the Fund to issue them is a failing of the first order, even if such warnings may not have been heeded. The consequences include suffering (and risk of worse to come) for many including Greece, that the second global reserve currency is on the brink, and that the Fund for the past two years has been playing catch-up and reactive roles in the last-ditch efforts to save it.
Further, the proximate factors which produced these failings of IMF surveillance—analytical risk aversion, bilateral priority, and European bias—are, if anything, becoming more deeply entrenched, notwithstanding initiatives which purport to address them. This fact is most clear in regard to appointments for Managing Director which, over the past decade, have all-too-evidently been disastrous. Even the current incumbent is tainted, as neither her gender, integrity, or élan can make up for the fundamental illegitimacy of the selection process. In a hierarchical place like this, the implications of those choices filter directly to others in senior management, and via the appointments, fixed term contracts, and succession planning of senior staff, they go on to infuse the organization as a whole, overwhelming everything else. A handicapped Fund, subject to those proximate roots of surveillance failure, is what the Executive Board prefers. Would that I had understood twenty years ago that this would be the choice.
There are good salty people here. But this one is moving on. You might want to take care not to lose the others.
cc. Ms. Nemat Shafik
Mr. Stanley Fischer
Mr. Stephan Ingves
Mr. Benny Andersen
Mr. Alex Gibbs
Mr. Eric Meyer
Mr. Amit Friedman
Mr. Martin Holmberg
Mr. Reza Moghadam
Mr. Mark Plant
Mr. Brad McDonald
end
I will leave you today with this offering from Wolf Richter on the hopeless plight of Southern Europe:
(courtesy Wolf Richter)
“Southern Europe Does Almost Nothing—Except Complain”
Submitted by testosteronepit on 07/20/2012 19:55 -0400
- Bulgaria
- default
- Eastern Europe
- European Central Bank
- Eurozone
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
- International Monetary Fund
- National Debt
- Recession
- Reserve Currency
- Unemployment
- World Bank
Wolf Richter www.testosteronepit.com
“While Eastern Europe is largely implementing the necessary reforms, Southern Europe does almost nothing—except complain,” said Bulgarian Finance Minister Simeon Djankov in aninterview, a withering blast aimed at neighboring Greece.
And in Greece, “The risk of bankruptcy is still existent,” saidFotis Kouvelis, the leader of Democratic Left, smallest of the three parties in the coalition government. His way of reminding the bailout Troika—the EU, the European Central Bank (ECB), and the IMF—to open the money spigot all the way, or else! The Troika inspectors are scheduled to return to Athens next week to have another look [read.... Greece Flails About, Troika Inspectors Paint “Awful Picture,” Merkel Draws A Line, German Industry & Voters Back Her: It’s Almost Over For Greece].
In September, armed with the inspectors’ final report, the Troika will decide whether or not to make the next bailout payment to Greece. If the decision is no, Greece will default and most likely return to the drachma.
“We demand an extension,” Kouvelis said, summarizing eloquently the strategy since the June elections. Instead of implementing with fiendish dedication the reforms that the prior government had agreed to in exchange for the second bailout package, the new government insists on renegotiating those reforms and then delaying those renegotiated reforms, while insisting on the continuous flow of other people’s billions. He complained about the recession, and that therefore structural reforms couldn’t be implemented.
But neighboring Bulgaria is one of the EU’s fastest growing economies. It has the second lowest national debt of all EU countries and even sports a budget surplus. Individual and corporate income tax rates are 10%. And it’s one of only three EU countries in compliance with the financial stability criteria in the Maastricht treaty. The very criteria that were supposed to have prevented the debt crisis ravaging the Eurozone. So the fiscal union treaty, pushed through by Chancellor Angela Merkel but hung up in the German Constitutional Court, is supposed to accomplish the same thing that the Maastricht treaty already failed to accomplish: force countries to obey limits on deficits and debt.
But Bulgaria has been in compliance, in part due to Djankov, who became Finance Minister in 2009, after a 14-year stint at the World Bank. When asked if his country, still one of the poorest in the EU, wasn’t balancing its budget at the expense of the people, he said: “That is a false and dangerous contradiction that the Southern Europeans recently added to the debate. Countries like Germany, Finland, or also Bulgaria have growing economies and still adhere to the deficit rules. Balanced budgets and growth are not a contradiction. Prerequisite is that the necessary reforms are implemented.”
Spain has been trying to do that. But people resist. With unemployment at 24.4%, their government on the brink of financial doom, and their banks collapsing, Spaniards have turned to protests. Yesterday, firefighters were on the forefront. While some battled the police, others protested tongue in cheek, and with a good laugh, making their point with perfect visual clarity—and with a lot of bare skin. Read.... Naked Firefighters Protest Salary Cuts (VIDEO - they use their hands or helmets to cover up their equipment).
And in Greece, reforms just aren’t implemented. Even the privatization of bloated state-owned enterprises is bogged down. 28 projects by 2015: electricity provider DEI, the postal service, airports, railroads, ports, hospitals.... For €19 billion, an amount that keeps shrinking. But this year, only two projects are on the list: the national lottery and the former International Center of the Olympic Press, a mere building.
And so, Costas Mitropoulos, the frustrated CEO of the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund, which was put in place a year ago to implement the privatizations, resigned. “The newly elected government has not given the support needed,” Mitropoulos wrote in his letter of resignation. “Instead, they have indirectly yet systematically reduced the prestige and credibility in the eyes of potential investors.”
And the argument that Bulgaria has an advantage over Greece because it has its own currency doesn’t hold water. After losing value at an exponential rate, the lev was pegged to the Deutsche Mark in 1999 at 1:1 and then to the euro at the DM’s conversion rate. And the peg has held! Alas, Bulgaria was scheduled to adopt the euro by January 1, 2012. A deadline that came and went. So was Djankov hesitating to adopt the euro? “Hesitating?” he said. “More than that. We put the process on ice. We first want to see what the future rules of the Eurozone look like.”
If it sticks around. In December 2001, when I was in Germany on business, bank showcases were filled with feel-good euro agitprop. Euros would enter circulation on January 1, and this was part of the campaign to persuade Germans to surrender their Deutsche Marks. Some were apprehensive, but my business contacts were gleeful: the euro would become the dominant reserve currency, and oil would be priced in it! Read....Now Even Counterfeiters Are Giving up on the Euro.
I wish you all to have a grand weekend. I will catch up with you Monday night.
all the best
Harvey
2. Sprott silver fund (PSLV): Premium to NAV rose to 3.26% to NAV July 21 2012 :
3. Sprott gold fund (PHYS): premium to NAV rose to 2.91% positive to NAV July 19.2012). .
3. Sprott gold fund (PHYS): premium to NAV rose to 2.91% positive to NAV July 19.2012). .
Finally, we are now starting to see premiums return to the Sprott silver fund. No doubt, in 3 to 4 weeks we will be back to previous premium levels as inventories around the world deplete in silver. The fact that Sprott removed 250 million dollars worth of silver is a dagger to our bankers.
end
Gold COT Report - Futures
| ||||||
Large Speculators
|
Commercial
|
Total
| ||||
Long
|
Short
|
Spreading
|
Long
|
Short
|
Long
|
Short
|
180,474
|
51,515
|
32,493
|
162,570
|
321,389
|
375,537
|
405,397
|
Change from Prior Reporting Period
| ||||||
-1,682
|
-4,406
|
2,261
|
-829
|
5,224
|
-250
|
3,079
|
Traders
| ||||||
151
|
64
|
80
|
46
|
42
|
231
|
165
|
Small Speculators
| ||||||
Long
|
Short
|
Open Interest
| ||||
55,780
|
25,920
|
431,317
| ||||
1,713
|
-1,616
|
1,463
| ||||
non reportable positions
|
Change from the previous reporting period
| |||||
COT Gold Report - Positions as of
|
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
| |||||
Silver COT Report: Futures
| |||||
Large Speculators
|
Commercial
| ||||
Long
|
Short
|
Spreading
|
Long
|
Short
| |
28,431
|
20,775
|
24,156
|
48,214
|
63,349
| |
-3
|
1,123
|
-2,128
|
-157
|
871
| |
Traders
| |||||
58
|
47
|
46
|
38
|
34
| |
Small Speculators
|
Open Interest
|
Total
| |||
Long
|
Short
|
121,819
|
Long
|
Short
| |
21,018
|
13,539
|
100,801
|
108,280
| ||
-2
|
-2,156
|
-2,290
|
-2,288
|
-134
| |
non reportable positions
|
Positions as of:
|
123
|
107
| ||
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
|
© SilverSeek.com
| ||||
The following is a review of gold trading Thursday night from Europe and Asia with commentaries
from Goldcore.
(courtesy Goldcore)
Gold Q2, 2012 - Investment Statistics And Commentary
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 12:09 -0400
- Bridgewater
- British Pound
- Budget Deficit
- China
- Debt Ceiling
- Dubai
- Eurozone
- Global Economy
- Hong Kong
- India
- International Monetary Fund
- Monetary Policy
- Precious Metals
- Recession
- Reuters
- Ron Paul
- Swiss Franc
- United Kingdom
- Volatility
- World Gold Council
- Yen
Submitted by GoldCore
Gold Q2, 2012 - Investment Statistics And Commentary
Today's AM fix was USD 1,583.00, EUR 1,291.30, and GBP 1,007.83 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,580.00, EUR 1,287.06 and GBP 1,009.33 per ounce.
Yesterday’s AM fix was USD 1,580.00, EUR 1,287.06 and GBP 1,009.33 per ounce.
Silver is trading at $27.07/oz, €22.22/oz and £17.32/oz. Platinum is trading at $1,418.25/oz, palladium at $577.80/oz and rhodium at $1,190/oz.
Gold rose $3.70 or 0.23% in New York yesterday and closed at $1,581.00/oz. It rose as high as $1,590/oz prior to determined selling which saw gold fall. Gold ticked higher in Asia prior to falling soon after the European open.
Gold has been trading in a range between $1,530/oz and $1,630/oz for nearly 2 months despite the Eurozone debt crisis entering its 3rd year and looking set to escalate and despite signs that the US economy is on the verge of a sharp recession.
These two factors alone mean that gold will likely resume its upward march due to continuing safe haven demand. The likelihood of further QE from the Fed will be icing on the cake for gold and silver.
US data yesterday showed factory activity shrunk in July for a 3rd consecutive month and the jobless claims rose last week.
Those who continue to put “lipstick on the pig” that is the US economy are lulling themselves and other unfortunates into another false sense of security.
“Blue skies thinking” regarding individual economies and the global economy got us into this mess and it will not get us out.
The World Gold Council have just published their commentary on gold’s price performance in various currencies, its volatility statistics and correlation to other assets in the quarter -
It provides macroeconomic context to the investment statistics published at the end of each quarter and highlights emerging themes relevant to gold’s future development.
One of their key findings is that gold will act as hedge against possible coming dollar weakness and gold will act as a "currency hedge in the international monetary system."
Key findings of the World Gold Council’s report:
Review: Key Macroeconomic Themes During Q2 2012
Gold prices declined in most currencies during the second quarter with the exception of the euro, Swiss franc and Indian rupee, in part due to a strong US dollar. Despite a 3.8% decline in Q2 to US$1,598.50/oz on the London PM fix, gold was up 4.4% during the first half of the year. Volatility remained elevated amidst a busy event-risk period. However, gold generally outperformed risk assets.
Global inflation eases but underlying trends supportive for gold: A substantial drop in energy and some agricultural commodities during the period has eased inflation pressures in many parts of the world and put downward pressure on gold prices.
Reassessing “risk-free” assets: Even assets traditionally considered safe are under pressure. German Bunds interest rates climbed in June. The Swiss franc, yen and US Treasuries are also facing issues – challenging their role as assets of last resort. Despite pressures on the price of gold, its lack of credit risk, its liquidity and hedging characteristics has made gold an attractive vehicle for long-term wealth preservation.
Correlation between gold and risk assets approaches long-term averages: Gold’s correlation to equities and other risk assets fell towards long-run average levels in Q2 helping portfolio diversification. Gold’s increased correlation to equities in Q1 was an indirect effect related to a weaker global economy coupled with a stronger US dollar.
Outlook: Emerging Macroeconomic Themes In H2 2012
Deflationary concerns in some countries provide room for further fiscal and monetary stimulus. This may lead to a further debasement of currencies through unconventional monetary policy and an increased risk of future inflation. These factors should provide support for future gold investment.
The underlying structural issues that affect the euro zone remain unresolved, despite advances in the formation of more comprehensive burden-sharing mechanisms. In such an environment of uncertainty and higher market volatility, gold will continue to be an asset that investors use to diversify risk and preserve capital.
The flight to the US dollar as a safe-haven in the first half of 2012 could be reversed. The US debt ceiling debate in Q3 and federal elections in November, followed by the necessity to confront a US$1.3tn budget deficit will prove challenging to the US dollar. With most currencies under pressure in one form or another, gold is likely to provide a hedging mechanism for investors
Dr. Constantin Gurdgiev, a non Executive member of theGoldCore Investment Committee, has analysed the Q2, 2012 World Gold Council data and has written a blog post that can be read here or see commentary.
He finds that the report is worth a read as it shows how gold generally outperformed risk assets and helped portfolio diversification.
He warns that safe haven government debt markets have all the hallmarks of “return-free risks” rather than “risk-free returns.”
The World Gold Council’s ‘Quarterly statistics commentary Q2 2012’ can be read here.
(Bloomberg) -- China Plans to Start Interbank Gold Trading on Local Market
China is preparing to introduce an interbank gold-trading system, a move that may enable domestic banks to treat the precious metal as a more liquid asset and increase holdings.
China is preparing to introduce an interbank gold-trading system, a move that may enable domestic banks to treat the precious metal as a more liquid asset and increase holdings.
The Shanghai Gold Exchange, the country’s biggest spot market, has been working with the China Foreign Exchange Trade System since the start of the year, Gu Wenshuo, an exchange spokesman, said today. The original plan was for the new system to be running at the end of August, Gu said by phone, adding that details are unavailable as banks are giving feedback.
China has been the largest producer since 2007, and was the biggest user after India last year. An interbank gold-trading system is part of broader reforms that Beijing aims to introduce to make the financial sector more market-driven, according to Jiang Shu, a senior analyst at Industrial Bank Co. Ltd.
“China is already very important in terms of gold production and consumption,” said Jeffrey Rhodes, global head of precious metals in Dubai at INTL FCStone Inc., a New York- based trading and brokerage firm. “If a new interbank market really does flourish, it could put the Chinese market in the mainstream and become world-class.”
Spot gold was 0.2 percent higher at $1,584.65 an ounce at 3:38 p.m. in Shanghai. The metal, which reached a record $1,921.15 in September, has rallied for 11 years on emerging- market and investment demand, as well as central-bank purchases.
Gold imports by mainland China from Hong Kong reached 314,810 kilograms in the first five months, compared with 39,607.4 kilograms a year ago, according to Bloomberg calculations based on data from the Hong Kong government.
For breaking news and commentary on financial markets and gold, follow us on Twitter.
NEWS
Gold steady on weak U.S. data; dollar weighs – Reuters
Gold advances for second day - MarketWatch
Gold steady on weak U.S. data; dollar weighs – Reuters
Gold advances for second day - MarketWatch
UK housing slump will deepen, warns IMF – The Telegraph
COMMENTARY
Dr Gurdgiev: Q2 Report From The World Gold Council – True Economics
COMMENTARY
Dr Gurdgiev: Q2 Report From The World Gold Council – True Economics
China’s Coming Assault on the Western Financial System – The Daily Reckoning
World economy now effectively a multitrillion-dollar game of chicken – Resource Clips
LBMA's gold price fixing scheme about to collapse, London trader tells KWN
Submitted by cpowell on Fri, 2012-07-20 19:07. Section: Daily Dispatches
3p ET Friday, July 20, 2012
Dear Friend of GATA and Gold:
The London trader source of King World News reports today that the nakedness of unallocated and even some supposedly allocated positions in the London bullion market now is being discussed openly and he expects defaults resulting in cash settlement as the prices of gold and silver vault higher. He adds that demand from China is steady and that China has accumulated far more metal than is being reported. An excerpt from the interview is headlined "The LBMA Gold Price Fixing Scheme Is Over" and it's posted at the King World News blog here:
CHRIS POWELL, Secretary/Treasurer
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee Inc.
end
Jim Sinclair launches operation: Investor's Spring Freedom against our crooked bankers.
He urges us to approach mining CEO's and tell them our concerns at what the big bankers are doing to our economy:
Investor’s Spring–Freedom!
My Dear Extended Family,
Investor’s Spring. Freedom at last!
You know that I have spent a good part of my life in an attempt to better understand the human experience looking for purpose. I would like to share with you a short conversation I had with Sai Baba in India in 1986. He said to me "What would you do if I made you a warrior?" The room was full of spiritually liberal people. I answered "make great war." There was a collective gasp by the attendees. Sai Baba said, "Right Answer, Sinclair."
Nobody wants war, but if it comes your way, and is your duty to pursue, it must be done, and done well. This war has been brought to us by those that would profit by destruction in clear violation of common commercial code.
These demons do not just short a situations based on a premise and await profit.
They pound mercilessly on the bids, seeking to depress the price.
They sell short the shares index and other funds buy as a means to get large numbers.
They immediately start dirty tricks.
They turn you in to regulatory bodies in the area of your trading and in the country of your operation on constructed nonsense.
They seek authors to write negative articles from their imagination to insult your integrity as a company not only where you work, but also where you trade.
They pay people to adopt a multitude of nicknames to post horrific lies about you personally and your company on chat boards.
They have a trading campaign to sell every instance of good news you have.
They have a trading campaign to sell your positive closes within the last 30 seconds of the trading day.
They enter orders with brokers who know what they want to happen in sizes larger than the total average daily trading to sell at the market on the close of Fridays.
They trade other exchange listed shares on the NASDAQ out of line with the listed close to skew the closing prices to the negative.
They actually paint the charts with their trading to make your situation less attractive technically.
They sell short the shares index and other funds buy as a means to get large numbers.
They immediately start dirty tricks.
They turn you in to regulatory bodies in the area of your trading and in the country of your operation on constructed nonsense.
They seek authors to write negative articles from their imagination to insult your integrity as a company not only where you work, but also where you trade.
They pay people to adopt a multitude of nicknames to post horrific lies about you personally and your company on chat boards.
They have a trading campaign to sell every instance of good news you have.
They have a trading campaign to sell your positive closes within the last 30 seconds of the trading day.
They enter orders with brokers who know what they want to happen in sizes larger than the total average daily trading to sell at the market on the close of Fridays.
They trade other exchange listed shares on the NASDAQ out of line with the listed close to skew the closing prices to the negative.
They actually paint the charts with their trading to make your situation less attractive technically.
These are only a few of the standard dirty tricks they execute in order to profit from these illegal acts to profit from the short which is the fruit of their crimes.
Their offense is violation of common commercial code. The short is simply the means of illicit profits. I do not intend to preach to you, but rather lead by example.
Your job is to get the attention first of those that are the management and directors of the companies you invest in that have been manipulated. You may have to be strong in order to accomplish this.
I am obligated in my corporate position to defend the company to the limit of my ability. I am obligated to say no, not on my watch. I am obligated to use all means, including litigation, to protect capital value on behalf of the investors. If I failed to do that I would be liable to you. This is true of every investment you have, not only precious metals shares.
Step one of "Investor’s Spring, Freedom" is to raise hell with the management and directors of your investments to take action to protect your interests from illegal and unethical activities. Tell them remedy exists in common commercial code moreso than securities laws.
I will let you know what I am doing as I do it. I will lead other companies to protect you by example.
It is up to you to do one simple thing. Wake up this bunch of brain dead office decorations, professional campers and rock hounds and get them to follow me in my march forward.
Respectfully,
Jim
Jim
end
Our friends over at the Silverdoctors.com web site has released the audio of the interview with Bill Murphy of GATA with respect to his London source. As a reminder, this London trader's views on what will happen have been 100% accurate over these past several years. The London trader believes that silver will explode in August.
Will it be because of the CFTC ruling that will be coming? Do not know, but something big is going to happen.
Listen...
10,276
end
Overnight in Europe we witnessed the risk is off trade with all Asian and European bourses in the red. The Euro/USA cross proceeded south and at 8 am est was trading at 1.2234. All eyes were on Spain with respect to the terms of what it will receive for its banking rescue. If you will recall, 30 billion euros was to come by the end of July. Markets were waiting for official news on this and on new terms. Loans will be forthcoming once stress tests on the banks in question commence.
The 10 yr Spanish bond yield again traded wider at 7.11%, with the Italian 10 year bond yield rising above the 6% level trading at 6.10%
(your overnight sentiment from Europe, courtesy zero hedge 8.am est Friday morning)
Overnight Sentiment: Europe Threatens Market Surreality Again
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 07:08 -0400
It is a quiet session so far with risk in the Off position (for now - we have yet to see the sinusoid HFT stop triggering function which rises stocks artificially as yesterday demonstrated so very well to nobody's surprise). All eyes are once again focusing to Europe, pushing the EURUSD lower for at least a few more hours until Europe closes and the repatriation resumes. In terms of key European events, today is the EU finance minister’s conference call on Spain today. As DB summarizes, officials are expected to approve the EU100 billion Spanish bank rescue plan however the exact size of the loan will probably only be determined in September pending the result of a bank-by-bank stress test. This will then pave way for restructuring plans for the sector in October which is broadly consistent with the timeline set out in the leaked draft MoU. At the previous meeting finance ministers agreed to first disburse EU30bn to Spain by the end of July so we will watch out for further confirmation of this today. We may also get the terms of the loan today. The conference call is expected to start at 10am GMT. What is odd is that unlike before when the mere possibility of a European catalyst was enough to push risk higher, this is no longer the case, and Spanish spreads to Bunds just hit another all time wide, with the Spanish 10 Year plunging to 7.11%, another post-summit high, this time dragging the Italian 10 Year which was at 6.10% at last check. And as explained before, the European uber pair trade means that as PIIGS yields soar, the core drops to new record, in most cases, negative nominal lows.
Will the world once again be able to ignore the once-again imploding European reality (and American: Of the 35 S&P 500 firms that reported results yesterday, about 74% of those came ahead of market consensus but only 57% of those topped sales forecasts.), and send the ES to a green close on the day? Or is today the day when reality comes back with a vengeance? Stay tuned and find out.
end
Opening Spanish 10 yr yield at 8 am est:
SPANISH GOVERNMENT GENERIC BONDS - 10 YR NOTE
Add to PortfolioGSPG10YR:IND
7.100000.08900 1.27%
Your opening Italian 10 yr bond yield: (8 am est)
Italy Govt Bonds 10 Year Gross Yield
Add to PortfolioGBTPGR10:IND
6.066000.06500 1.08%
As of 07:40:00 ET on 07/20/2012.
end
In the following video, Stratfor's Adrian Bosoni highlights the fundamental contradictions and the major flaw in the European financial crisis. We see that ECB board member Asmussen, and German minister Schaeuble both steadfastly state that there will be no money transfer without a sovereignty (fiscal) transfer. Bosoni states correctly that this is the proper way to proceed on a long term basis in order to have a robust and unified budgetary regime. The flaw: the length of time to ratify this. Spain, Portugal, and Greece all have very short time horizons due to their massive problems and all have asked for a delay in implementing a balancing of their budgetary deficits. In other words, the PIIGS nations are asking for continual bailouts with the hope that they will get their act together.
the video is a must see as it gives a terrific review of the problems facing Spain and other PIIGS nations. This was released a few hours before the Valencia announcement.The video is 3 1/2 minutes.
(courtesy, Bosoni/Stratfor/zero hedge)
Europe's Fundamental Flaw Resurfaces
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/19/2012 19:54 -0400
"Two weeks after a summit that promised to bring solutions to the European financial crisis, the European Union has once again revealed its fundamental contradictions" is how Stratfor's Adrian Bosoni introduces a succinct clip on the reality the European leaders faced once they arrived home after that strenuous weekend of blithering. Between Asmussen and Schaeuble who have steadfastly stuck to the no-monetary-transfer-without-sovereign-transfer tack - which actually make a fair amount of sense on a long-term basis - a robust and unified budgetary regime is precisely what Europe has lacked. Unfortunately, Bosoni notes, "even in a best case scenario this could not be achieved before 2015" thanks to treaties, referenda, and ratifications. In a little over 3 minutes, the analyst outlines exactly what is holding it back and why the short-term is all they have as budgetary discipline is proving particularly difficult for the EU members to maintain (see more Spanish riots tonight). Between Spain's delays in meeting targets, Greece's 'impossible' budgetary goals, Ireland's demands for concessions, and Finland's collateral agreement with Spain, unifying anything over there seems impractical and impossible.
A must watch for the quickest summary of the state of Europe - and the best explanation of the reality to which European credit markets are cracking as opposed to the nominal price of global equities leaking higher...
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 07:58 -0400
end
From the USA side of things, Bruce Krasting weighs in on Schumer's choice of words to Bernanke this week: " get to work, Mr Bernanke"
Just as today's largely expected announcement that the Eurogroup has formally agreed to accept the Spanish bail out (details still lacking), the Spanish region of Valencia just became the second to officially demand a bailout following Catalunya's comparable announcement at the end of May, and has announced it will need to tap the government liquidity mechanism. Kneejerk reaction: EURUSD sharply lower and below 1.22 for the first time in days.
From Reuters:
Spain's heavily indebted eastern region of Valencia said on Friday it would apply for help under the government's 18 billion euro plan passed on Thursday aimed at helping regional finances.The plan comes with strict conditionality that a region stick to its deficit cutting plans.
Concurrent with this announcement, Spain also announced an update to its deficit projections, whose details are meaningless as they will be revised adversely shortly, which confirmed that the Spanish economy continues to deteriorate at an accelerating pace.
Spanish Stocks Plunge Most In 12 Months As Egan-Jones Cuts Spain To CC+
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 10:50 -0400
With IBEX down 6%, 10Y yields over 7.30%, 10Y spread over 610bps, and EURJPY at 12 year lows; the hits just keep coming. From Ega-Jones:
Slipping - Spain's 10 year debt is now yielding 7.18%, which is a reflection of the weakening of the economy and the credit quality of Spain. In addition to the expected austerity riots, the latest news is that Valencia and other regions will need $15B of aid, the sen. debtholders of the weak banks will be forced to take losses, and there might be some sharing of losses among all banks. An estimated decline in GDP of 1.7% (per the Economy Ministry), the 25% unemployment, the IIF's recent estimate of addl bank loan losses up to EUR260B, and possible depositor withdrawals hurt. From 2008 to 2011, Spain's debt mushroomed from EUR436B to EUR735B while its GDP declined from EUR1.09T to EUR1.07T. Social benefits are a major problem; while pmts to the govt have been more or less flat over the past four years (up EUR 3B), payments from the government have been up EUR 45B. As a result, Spain is short about EUR50B per year for social payments, EUR20B per year for interest, and an additional EUR 20B for asset growth; hence the EUR90B per annum increase in debt.Spain will inevitably be faced with addl pmts to support a portion its banking sector and for its weaker provinces. Assets of Spain's largest two banks exceed its GDP. We are slipping our rating to "CC+"; watch for more requests for support from the banks and money creation.
via Bloomberg.
Europe Ends In A Sea Of Red
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 11:47 -0400
Spain's broad equity index suffered its second largest single-day drop in almost 4 years and Italy also tumbled almost 5% as everything European was sold hard. EuroStoxx (the broad Dow equivalent) is down almost 3% as EURUSD dropped to two year lows, EURJPY to 12 year lows. AAA safe havens were massively bid with Germany, Denmark, and Switzerland all to new low (negative) rate closes. Core equity markets did suffer though with Germany down 2% but it was the periphery that saw the damage in credit-land with Spain 10Y closing at 7.27%, 610bps over Bunds (and 5Y CDS over 605bps). Spanish spreads are +130bps from post-Summit (and pre-Summit) and Italy +78bps, but it is the front-end of the curve that is most worrisome - Spain's 2Y is 132bps wider in the last week. Europe's VIX exploded by over 4 vols to 24%today and once again looks decidedly high relative to US VIX.
Spain and Italy surging to as bad a performance as Portugal...post Summit...
but it is the front-end that is a disaster! This is where all the LTRO debt is being held that was put on as part of the Sarkozy carry trade - ECB margin calls here we come!!
but while this is apples to apple-like things comparisons, the difference between credit and equity market reactions post Summit remain remarkable...(though today saw a pretty decent turnaround)...
and broadly European stocks were hammered today as hope fades...
charts: Bloomberg
The Fed will have another FOMB meeting on August 1.
It is there that they will decide on the following;
1. Do nothing
ii) Extend ZIRP to 2014
iii) Announce another QEIII of say 250- 600 billion dollars
iv) Cut the deposit rate from 1/4% to 1/8%
Krasting believes it will be the latter and he gives his reasons why.
Also the consequences of that action.
(a must read)
Bernanke - Post Schumer Gaffe
Submitted by Bruce Krasting on 07/20/2012 08:59 -0400
end
It seems that our Libor rate setters took "requests" from companies to alter their rate so that they could earn big money.
This is getting hotter by the minute:
(courtesy zero hedge)
end
The mayor of Baltimore is taking on the Libor crooks and will sue for millions!!!
(courtesy the London Guardian) and special thanks to Don Jack for providing...
end
Yesterday, an Italian prosecutor is setting his eyes on the Euribor fixing:
(courtesy Dow Jones international news) and special thanks to Don Jack for providing this to me
end
There is another big Financial times article for you to red written by Patrick Jenkins and Caroline Binham of Bloomberg. It was published in the London Financial times where it was reported that the UK's FSA is stepping up its probe on the Libor scandal.
It seems that the key player is Barclay's Philip Moryoussef who was the centre of things as he received and manipulated the rates basically from the Singapore hub. The article suggests that the 3 other kingpins that we identified for you on Thursday were:
i) Michael Zrihen of Credit Agricole. he has been removed from trading by his new employer.
ii) Didier Sander of HSBC iii) Christian Bittar of Deutsche Bank.
you will recall that Deutsche Bank turned in state's evidence so that they are basically immune to prosecution.
I have the article and I will try to copy and paste this important article for you onto my commentary today.
end
The rats are fleeing a sinking ship!!
(courtesy zero hedge)
end
I will leave you today with this offering from Wolf Richter on the hopeless plight of Southern Europe:
(courtesy Wolf Richter)
I wish you all to have a grand weekend. I will catch up with you Monday night.
all the best
Harvey
- Ben Bernanke
- Bond
- China
- Copper
- CRAP
- European Central Bank
- Fail
- Finland
- Germany
- India
- Monetary Policy
- Ron Paul
- Switzerland
- Yield Curve
I'm adding myself to the long list of folks who have commented on NY Senator Chuck Schumer's choice of words to Bernanke the other day:
.
.
.
Schumer is a political hack. He wants the Fed to do ‘something’ today that would give the economy a lift heading into the election. Chuck knows that the Legislative side can’t/won’t do a thing before November, so he begs Ben to light another monetary fire to help the Democratic cause. Chucky boy is an ass.
I doubt that Bernanke listens to the noise from Senators very often, but Chuck’s words got a lot of press. I'm wondering what Ben is thinking. Schumer has brought politics into the outcome of the August 1st Fed meeting. Whatever Ben decides to do, he will be accused of partisan politics.
There are many scenarios for the August Fed meeting:
.
I) Do nothing
.
Arguments For:
a) The economy stinks, but it is not in a crisis. More “crisis monetary measures” are not justified.
b) With the 10-year already at 1.5%, the Fed can’t accomplish anything by pushing rates a few basis points lower.
Arguments Against:
The election and related political considerations will absolutely tie the Feds hands after the August meeting. The next chance for the Fed to “do something” will be in late November. If Bernanke wants to buy some insurance, he has to do something in August.
.
II) Extend the ZIRP language past 2014
.
Arguments For:
I can’t think of any.
Arguments Against.
Because there is no substance to this, there is a very strong likely hood that the markets will take a few seconds, and then puke. Bernanke knows this. He doesn’t want to lay an egg.
.
III) QE3 – $600B LSAP targeted to Agency Mortgage Bonds
.
Arguments For:
a) This is what the market wants to see. Failure to do QE3 will disappoint, Ben does not want to disappoint.
b) This a is “populist” approach. Ben can say that he is doing his best to allow homeowners to ReFi and prospective buyers to get a record low rate.
Arguments Against:
a) This is an “all in bet”. Even Bernanke has been questioning the efficacy of additional QE of late.
b) Senator Shelby and Speaker Boehner will say, “The Fed is printing money to play politics!”
c) Bernanke’s critics will go wild.
d) There is absolutely no certainty that another big LSAP will do a damn thing.
.
IV) QE3 - $250B LSAP targeted to Agency Mortgage Bonds
Arguments For:
A small QE would create less political backlash. Ben could argue that he is being “moderate” and will, as always, be willing to do more if this modest monetary “bump” proves to be inadequate.
Arguments Against:
a) A “half a loaf” is going to fail miserably. Bernanke wants monetary policy to jack up stocks, as he thinks this creates jobs. Stocks would nose dive if this is the result. Bernanke understands this.
b) Both Blues and Reds would be upset. Schumer will be pointing at Bernanke and saying, “He didn’t do his job!” At the same time Ron Paul would be calling for Ben’s head on a platter.
.
V) Something Else – A cut in the deposit rate from a 1/4% to a 1/8%
.
Arguments For:
a) This appears to be a modest step. As such, it would be less susceptible to criticism.
b) The small change in the deposit rate would achieve something that Bernanke has been shooting for a long time.Returns on short-term money would go negative. Three and Six month Bills would certainly be negative. One-year paper would trade around flat.
c) Germany and Switzerland are already in negative territory. Other, smaller bond markets like Finland and Sweden are also in the red. For the US to follow suit would not be that big a surprise. Bernanke could blunt critics by saying he had done less than Europe - an 1/8th in the US versus 0% for the ECB.
d) The change to negative yields, (regardless of how small), will force money to move around. There are trillions in money market funds, Trillions in short term Treasury paper, and trillions more on corporate balance sheets. All of this is now going to be looking at negative returns.
e) With the first rungs of the yield curve in the bucket, the longer maturities would be dragged down. The Ten-year would move toward 1%. This result would be similar to the (hoped for) outcome of a large LSAP.
f) Bernanke could still say, “The Fed has more it could do”, as the deposit rate could be cut again (to zero) at some point.
.
Of these options, I believe that #V has the greatest probability of occurring.
I hope that the Fed sits tight, and does nothing. But that seems unlikely. Bernanke knows that the economy is now decelerating, and that his hands get tied after the August meeting. So“something” is more likely than “nothing”.
It’s hard to predict what might happen if Ben pushes rates into negative territory. It could end up resulting in an orderly market transition from cash, to high-risk securities like stocks and junk bonds. The virtuous cycle of higher stocks leading to higher spending and more jobs might be the result. But I doubt it.
Arguments Against:
a) The knee jerk reaction to negative rates might be positive, but in a short period of time the market will come to realize that negative rates are not going to force people (more) into dividend stocks. Quite the opposite, it will scare the crap out of them.
b) This is not good for the banks (who cares); but the financials are still a big chunk of the S&P.
c) This move will likely cause more “unwanted inflation”. If China or India is faced with negative returns on their reserves, they might be inclined to just buy commodities with the billions of cash they are sitting on. Prices of grains, beans, copper, coal and oil come to mind. Gold would be on the list as well.
d) If three-month bills went from +8bp to -7bp you might think that it wouldn't matter. The change is so small on a relative basis. I think of it as stepping off the edge of a cliff.
The entire global financial system is based on fiat money and the presumption that the money has “value” as a store of wealth. Nearly every action by the Fed over the past few years has led to the debasement of money. In the final stage, the issuers of money debase it to the point where it is no longer desirable to hold. I see the move to negative rates across the globe as a tipping point, one that will be damn hard to reverse once undertaken.
.
.
The Hedge Fund Trail In Liborgate Gets Hotter: Mega Fund Brevan Howard Next?
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 12:55 -0400
- Barclays
- Brevan Howard
- British Bankers' Association
- Convexity
- Exchange Traded Fund
- fixed
- LIBOR
- RBS
- Reality
- Switzerland
Two days ago we made the "missing link" connection between traders in Libor manipulating banks (all of which curiously had a hub in Singapore: something else for the media that has been about 4 years too late on this topic to focus on) and hedge funds (most of which curiously centering on the otherwise sleepy bastion of banking: Geneva, Switzerland). The immediate aftermath was the loss of trading privileges of one Michael Zrihen. We are fairly certain this is just the beginning of the hedge fund bust: when all is said and done, many more funds will have terminated traders they hired for reasons (and kickbacks) unknown over the past 2 years as Lie-bor manipulators sought to put a clean firewalled break between their old employer and current one. Because apparently sometimes the regulators are that stupid and can be confused by a simple job change. And while many have assumed (and even calculated based on completely groundless assumptions) that only BBA member banks have benefited from Libor manipulation, the reality is that hedge funds were just as complicit and benefited just as much if not more. What is worse, they took advantage of their whale client status with manipulating banks, and courtesy of Total Return Swap and other leveraged gimmicks, made far more money when they co-opted two or more banks to do their bidding. Impossible you say: hedge funds would never be so stupid. Oh very possible: we present exhibit A - Brevan Howard, a "fund, with assets of $20.8 billion as of Dec. 31, has never had a losing year and returned 14.4 percent annualized from its April 2003 inception through the end of 2008" as Bloomberg said in a made to order profile of the funds recently. Perhaps there is a very simple reason for this trading perfection: "Brevan Howard telephoned on 20 Aug 2007 to ask the defendant to change the Libor rate," according to a paper filed with the Singapore High Court cited by Bloomberg."
Here is The Telegraph with a smoking gun that was promptly buried in the avalanche of sudden media coverage in the aftermath of the Barclays Liborgate settlement.
Tan Chi Min, a former RBS trader who claims he was wrongfully dismissed by the bank after it fired him for allegedly trying to manipulate Libor - the average rate at which banks lend to each other - said he had received the request in 2007 from Brevan Howard."Brevan Howard telephoned on 20 Aug 2007 to ask the defendant to change the Libor rate," according to a paper filed with the Singapore High Court cited by Bloomberg.
Oops.
That one statement should be enough to send shivers into the heart of whoever may be General Counsel of Brevan Howard (and many other mega funds right now whose names will make front page appearances in the coming weeks), as it provides the banks with something that so far has been missing. Motive. Because while it may be difficult to prove that Barclays or RBS benefited from Libor manipulation, pandering to a mega client is very, very easy to prove - there is always a trace. It also makes it very easy for the prosecution to include hedge funds, which are just as hated by the general populace as big banks if not more, into what is shaping up as one perfect litigation storm (and distraction from the real culprit here: the global central bank cartel).
Telegraph goes on:
The court filing alleges RBS "received this request without objection". Brevan Howard is not a party to the lawsuit and is not being investigated or sued for any alleged wrongdoing. RBS and Brevan Howard both declined to comment.Mr Tan claimed in his filing that Scott Nygaard, head of short-term markets finance at RBS, knew about the call from Brevan Howard. However, the filing contained no further details to support his allegations. However, he is reported to have said he would provide further evidence at a later stage.The legal case follows Mr Tan's firing in December over allegations he had attempted to improperly influence RBS's Libor-setting staff between 2007 and 2011. Mr Tan, who worked for RBS in Singapore as head of delta trading, claims he was wrongfully dismissed by the bank.
Ah yes our old friends: the ubiquitous Delta Traders who somehow have a finger in everything from ETF trading, to gamma, to convexity trades, and now- serving as the nexus between Libor manipulation demanding clients and in house Libor fixers.
The plot just gets thicker and thicker.
Mr Tan is claiming $1.5m (£943,000) in bonuses and 3.3m RBS shares that he says the bank owes him in pay. He claims in his lawsuit that asking for changes in Libor was "common practice" among RBS traders and that the bank "took requests from clients" to alter the rate.
And there it is: "Took requests from clients" not just manipulated rates for its own interest. And this is where the universe of guilty parties explodes exponentially, and reaches not only Geneva Switzerland, but virtually every single hedge fund that had even a modest fixed income trading link over the past decade.
Watch this space closely: it will get very hot soon.
| HEADLINE: 'We are not afraid' ... US mayor suing for millions over Libor |
BYLINE: Dominic Rushe New York
|
BODY:
A little over two years ago Stephanie Rawlings-Blake had never heard of Libor. The mayor of Baltimore had other things to keep her occupied. Elected in 2010, she was dealing with the aftermath of a financial crisis that had left her city with a budget deficit of $120m (£76m) and the cost of cleaning up the worst two-day snow storm in the city's history. And then she found out the credit crunch had come back to take another bite out of the city's finances. Baltimore is lead plaintiff in a class action suit which alleges that banks including Barclays, Bank of America, HSBC, JP Morgan and UBS conspired to fix a set of key interest rates - the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) - and cost the city millions in the process. So far the Libor scandal has played out mostly under the radar in the US. But now the affair is gaining traction in Washington and Baltimore's lawsuit is putting a human face on a scandal legal experts predict could end up being the most costly of the credit crisis. Rawlings-Blake claims firemen, services for the elderly, school programmes and more are being cut as a direct result of the bankers' actions. According to the court documents Baltimore bought "tens of millions of dollars' worth of interest rate swaps" during the period when the alleged fixing took place. The suit alleges that between August 2007 and May 2010 the defendants conspired to suppress Libor below the levels at which it would have been set had they accurately reported their borrowing costs. Those manipulations had "severe adverse consequences" for Baltimore and others, according to the suit. Other US cities are watching carefully. Baltimore had no choice but to fight, said Rawlings-Blake. "We are faced with closing fire companies, recreational centres, we have services that have been cut year after year, services that people depend on. Opportunities for young people, cleanliness of the city, everything is affected by the budget. We can't afford to leave money on the table." The city has a reputation for taking on the banks. This month Wells Fargo settled a suit launched by the city four years ago that alleged it discriminated against black and Latino mortgage borrowers. "It's certainly disappointing and I understand why a lot of people have lost a lot of trust and faith in the financial institutions. They are pretty much playing fast and loose with the people they are meant to protect," she said. "We stand up for ourselves. One thing about Baltimore is that we are not afraid of a fight. There are too many needs we have in this city." But this case looks set to put all others in the shade. Policymakers around the world are calling for an overhaul of the Libor system, which underpins $500trn of contracts globally - everything from home loans to arcane derivatives. Stephen Bainbridge, a professor of law at the University of California, said the case was "one of the worst examples of abuse of trust that I can remember in 25 years of following corporate governance". Given the scale of Libor's influence, he said this could emerge as "the defining financial scandal of the meltdown". Bainbridge believes the US justice department may build an anti-trust case against those involved that could ultimately lead to a settlement as large as that agreed in the US's massive suit against the tobacco industry. Anti-trust laws allow damages to be tripled for those convicted of collusion. But he believes a suit such as Baltimore's may be harder to prove. The city's lawyers will have to prove direct "loss causation" - that bankers fixing rates in London directly hit Baltimore's account balance. "Proving that chain of events can be difficult," said Bainbridge. Baltimore city solicitor George Nilson, however, said he was confident there was a good case to answer. He pointed out that the process of discovery - when the city gets hold of internal emails and documents from the bank - had not even started yet. Nilson said his one fear was that just as some banks were too big to fail, this could be a case that was "too big to try". Captions: Stephanie Rawlings-Blake said services in Baltimore had closed because of the Libor scandal Photograph: Gail Burton/AP |
LOAD-DATE: July 19, 2012.
(as an aside, I am sure the good folks over at Birmingham Alabama also have their sites fixated on our Libor crooks) |
| HEADLINE: Italian Prosecutor Said to Open Probe Into Euribor Fixing |
BODY:
ROME--An Italian court has begun a probe into possible manipulation of the Euribor, a benchmark interest rate for an array of financial products, two Italian consumer lobbies said Friday. Michele Ruggiero, a prosecutor in the southern town of Trani, has opened a criminal probe into potential market-rigging and fraud through manipulation of the Euribor rate, Federconsumatori said on its website. Federconsumatori and Adusbef recently filed a complaint to the Trani court. Adusbef, another consumer rights lobby, said Italian mortgage holders had suffered at least 3 billion euros ($3.7 billion) in losses due to manipulation of the Euribor rate. Mr. Ruggiero has ordered Italy's tax police to gather relevant documents and has set up a team of experts to conduct the probe, Federconsumatori said. Mr. Ruggiero is also leading a criminal probe into alleged misconduct by major rating agencies, all of which have downgraded Italy's sovereign credit rating in the past year. Write to Christopher Emsden at chris.emsden@dowjones.com Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires [ 20-07-12 0914GMT ] |
NOTES:
PUBLISHER: Dow Jones & Company, Inc. |
LOAD-DATE: July 20, 2012
end
Now, Wall Street is set to attack its own as those who did not set the rates attack their fellow brethren. (courtesy Ed Steer and Bloomberg) Feeding Frenzy Seen If Wall Street Sues Itself Over Libor
Wall Street, grappling with mounting regulatory probes and investor claims over alleged interest-rate manipulation, may face yet another formidable foe: Itself.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley are among financial firms that may bring lawsuits against their biggest rivals as regulators on three continents examine whether other banks manipulated the London interbank offered rate, known as Libor, said Bradley Hintz, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. Even if Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley forgo claims on their own behalf, they oversee money-market funds that may be required to pursue restitution for injured clients, he said.
Because Libor is based on submissions from only some of the world’s largest banks, the probes threaten to pit firms uninvolved in setting the rate against any implicated in its manipulation, Hintz said. Libor serves as a benchmark for at least $360 trillion in securities.
Yes, it will certainly be interesting to watch this all unfold. This Bloomberg offering was posted on their website late yesterday afternoon...and I thank West Virginia reader Elliot Simon for bringing it to our attention. It's certainly worth reading...and the link is here.
|
Scandal At The IMF: Senior Economist Resigns, Says "Ashamed To Have Had Any Association With Fund At All"
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 07/20/2012 14:58 -0400
The rats everywhere are now jumping furiously off the titanic, but few had taken the time to write a letter explaining in detail just how broken the Titanic was just as it was sinking This has now changed, with the departure of Peter Doyle, formerly a division chief in the IMF’s European Department responsible for non-crisis countries and currently an adviser to the Fund. Not content with quietly slinking off the scandal ridden organization which has become the butt of all jokes in the international community, where humor about Lagarde's Louis Vuitton panhandling bag is as pervasive as punchlines about just how incompetent the organization is at actually doing its duty, Doyle has penned the following scathing letter which tears down every myth about the IMF: from its impartiality, to the selection process of its head, to its effectiveness. The letter also contains the following gem: "After twenty years of service, I am ashamed to have had any association with the Fund at all." Pretty much says it all. This is a scandal in the making, and one which may shake to the core the credibility of the IMF in the context of international organization.
Full letter (pdf)
European Department
Washington DC
June 18, 2012
Washington DC
June 18, 2012
To Mr. Shaalan, Dean of the IMF Executive Board
Today, I addressed the Executive Board for the last time—because I am leaving the Fund.
Accordingly, I wanted first to formally express my deep appreciation to the Swedish, Israeli, and Danish authorities with whom I have worked recently, as well as all others with whom I have worked earlier, for their extraordinary generosity towards me personally.
But I also wanted to take this opportunity to explain my departure.
After twenty years of service, I am ashamed to have had any association with the Fund at all.
This is not solely because of the incompetence that was partly chronicled by the OIA report into the global crisis and the TSR report on surveillance ahead of the Euro Area crisis. More so, it is because the substantive difficulties in these crises, as with others, were identified well in advance but were suppressed here. Given long gestation periods and protracted international decision-making processes to head off both these global challenges, timely sustained warnings were of the essence. So the failure of the Fund to issue them is a failing of the first order, even if such warnings may not have been heeded. The consequences include suffering (and risk of worse to come) for many including Greece, that the second global reserve currency is on the brink, and that the Fund for the past two years has been playing catch-up and reactive roles in the last-ditch efforts to save it.
Further, the proximate factors which produced these failings of IMF surveillance—analytical risk aversion, bilateral priority, and European bias—are, if anything, becoming more deeply entrenched, notwithstanding initiatives which purport to address them. This fact is most clear in regard to appointments for Managing Director which, over the past decade, have all-too-evidently been disastrous. Even the current incumbent is tainted, as neither her gender, integrity, or élan can make up for the fundamental illegitimacy of the selection process. In a hierarchical place like this, the implications of those choices filter directly to others in senior management, and via the appointments, fixed term contracts, and succession planning of senior staff, they go on to infuse the organization as a whole, overwhelming everything else. A handicapped Fund, subject to those proximate roots of surveillance failure, is what the Executive Board prefers. Would that I had understood twenty years ago that this would be the choice.
There are good salty people here. But this one is moving on. You might want to take care not to lose the others.
cc. Ms. Nemat Shafik
Mr. Stanley Fischer
Mr. Stephan Ingves
Mr. Benny Andersen
Mr. Alex Gibbs
Mr. Eric Meyer
Mr. Amit Friedman
Mr. Martin Holmberg
Mr. Reza Moghadam
Mr. Mark Plant
Mr. Brad McDonald
Mr. Stanley Fischer
Mr. Stephan Ingves
Mr. Benny Andersen
Mr. Alex Gibbs
Mr. Eric Meyer
Mr. Amit Friedman
Mr. Martin Holmberg
Mr. Reza Moghadam
Mr. Mark Plant
Mr. Brad McDonald
“Southern Europe Does Almost Nothing—Except Complain”
Submitted by testosteronepit on 07/20/2012 19:55 -0400
- Bulgaria
- default
- Eastern Europe
- European Central Bank
- Eurozone
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
- International Monetary Fund
- National Debt
- Recession
- Reserve Currency
- Unemployment
- World Bank
Wolf Richter www.testosteronepit.com
“While Eastern Europe is largely implementing the necessary reforms, Southern Europe does almost nothing—except complain,” said Bulgarian Finance Minister Simeon Djankov in aninterview, a withering blast aimed at neighboring Greece.
And in Greece, “The risk of bankruptcy is still existent,” saidFotis Kouvelis, the leader of Democratic Left, smallest of the three parties in the coalition government. His way of reminding the bailout Troika—the EU, the European Central Bank (ECB), and the IMF—to open the money spigot all the way, or else! The Troika inspectors are scheduled to return to Athens next week to have another look [read.... Greece Flails About, Troika Inspectors Paint “Awful Picture,” Merkel Draws A Line, German Industry & Voters Back Her: It’s Almost Over For Greece].
In September, armed with the inspectors’ final report, the Troika will decide whether or not to make the next bailout payment to Greece. If the decision is no, Greece will default and most likely return to the drachma.
“We demand an extension,” Kouvelis said, summarizing eloquently the strategy since the June elections. Instead of implementing with fiendish dedication the reforms that the prior government had agreed to in exchange for the second bailout package, the new government insists on renegotiating those reforms and then delaying those renegotiated reforms, while insisting on the continuous flow of other people’s billions. He complained about the recession, and that therefore structural reforms couldn’t be implemented.
But neighboring Bulgaria is one of the EU’s fastest growing economies. It has the second lowest national debt of all EU countries and even sports a budget surplus. Individual and corporate income tax rates are 10%. And it’s one of only three EU countries in compliance with the financial stability criteria in the Maastricht treaty. The very criteria that were supposed to have prevented the debt crisis ravaging the Eurozone. So the fiscal union treaty, pushed through by Chancellor Angela Merkel but hung up in the German Constitutional Court, is supposed to accomplish the same thing that the Maastricht treaty already failed to accomplish: force countries to obey limits on deficits and debt.
But Bulgaria has been in compliance, in part due to Djankov, who became Finance Minister in 2009, after a 14-year stint at the World Bank. When asked if his country, still one of the poorest in the EU, wasn’t balancing its budget at the expense of the people, he said: “That is a false and dangerous contradiction that the Southern Europeans recently added to the debate. Countries like Germany, Finland, or also Bulgaria have growing economies and still adhere to the deficit rules. Balanced budgets and growth are not a contradiction. Prerequisite is that the necessary reforms are implemented.”
Spain has been trying to do that. But people resist. With unemployment at 24.4%, their government on the brink of financial doom, and their banks collapsing, Spaniards have turned to protests. Yesterday, firefighters were on the forefront. While some battled the police, others protested tongue in cheek, and with a good laugh, making their point with perfect visual clarity—and with a lot of bare skin. Read.... Naked Firefighters Protest Salary Cuts (VIDEO - they use their hands or helmets to cover up their equipment).
And in Greece, reforms just aren’t implemented. Even the privatization of bloated state-owned enterprises is bogged down. 28 projects by 2015: electricity provider DEI, the postal service, airports, railroads, ports, hospitals.... For €19 billion, an amount that keeps shrinking. But this year, only two projects are on the list: the national lottery and the former International Center of the Olympic Press, a mere building.
And so, Costas Mitropoulos, the frustrated CEO of the Hellenic Republic Asset Development Fund, which was put in place a year ago to implement the privatizations, resigned. “The newly elected government has not given the support needed,” Mitropoulos wrote in his letter of resignation. “Instead, they have indirectly yet systematically reduced the prestige and credibility in the eyes of potential investors.”
And the argument that Bulgaria has an advantage over Greece because it has its own currency doesn’t hold water. After losing value at an exponential rate, the lev was pegged to the Deutsche Mark in 1999 at 1:1 and then to the euro at the DM’s conversion rate. And the peg has held! Alas, Bulgaria was scheduled to adopt the euro by January 1, 2012. A deadline that came and went. So was Djankov hesitating to adopt the euro? “Hesitating?” he said. “More than that. We put the process on ice. We first want to see what the future rules of the Eurozone look like.”
If it sticks around. In December 2001, when I was in Germany on business, bank showcases were filled with feel-good euro agitprop. Euros would enter circulation on January 1, and this was part of the campaign to persuade Germans to surrender their Deutsche Marks. Some were apprehensive, but my business contacts were gleeful: the euro would become the dominant reserve currency, and oil would be priced in it! Read....Now Even Counterfeiters Are Giving up on the Euro.
















