Garic comes in with…
This morning the $ is rallying and Gold is selling off on the article in the Wall Street Journal "Fed to Keep Lid on Bond Buys". In the article Fed sources claim that they are unlikely to announce a major increase in Treasury purchases at the June meeting. Clearly this appears to be directly contrary to my Wednesday posting that I felt the Fed would announce a doubling down of the monetization of debt as next week’s triple witching bombshell. Looking at my screen I notice that S&P futures are basically unchanged, bonds are rallying and the dollar is rallying. Intuitively one would expect stock futures to be getting slammed if the Fed were really announcing an end to the extraordinary liquidity they are providing to the market. Since the Fed has proven to be in the game of managing expectations, instead of running monetary policy prudently, I am more interested in what they are doing than what they are saying.http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h41/Current/Yesterday, the Federal Reserve reported holding $1.133T in Treasury, Agency and Mortgage Backed Securities; a one week increase of $19B. Over the past 5 weeks the Federal Reserve has reported purchasing a total of $144B of these securities. An additional line item in the Fed’s balance sheet is called "Marketable securities held in custody for foreign official and international accounts (1)". Last week the Fed reported a $17.9B increase in these securities held. Over the past 5 weeks the increase in these securities held is $89B. Mainstream analysts would like us to believe this is where Foreign Central Banks report their Treasury holdings as they recycle their trade surpluses. Clearly these numbers are much larger than the $29B monthly trade deficit we have been reporting recently. Since the Federal Reserve refuses to be audited, I think it is reasonable to assume that the Fed is using this line item to accelerate their purchases of Treasury’s. Over the past 5 weeks the Federal Reserve has purchased as much as $233B in securities; yet, they want us to believe they are winding down their monetization of the debt. Lies, manipulation and the printing press appear to be functioning smoothly at the Federal Reserve.
***My bet is the Orwellians intervened in our financial markets because of the renewed slump in the US real estate market. There has been increasing talk how the jump in mortgage rates, related to the yield of the 10 yr T note, is have an increasing negative effect on that market. Hence, they went into action to take our rates down with as little fanfare as possible.
At the moment The Gold Cartel and other commercial shorts have had their way. They have MANAGED to turn the technicals bearish which will attract the usual obligatory selling of a number of trend following, technical trading systems. Do we have to go through many weeks of a tedious liquidation process? The answer to that question will depend on the amount of competitive demand for physical gold, now at cheaper prices. Should there be enough buyers who want in, then what we got today could just be a one day wonder and back up we go.
$930 is a key support point. If that level holds next week, and the cabal forces can’t gain any traction on the downside, we ought to make a quick U-turn and go right back up. Otherwise … drudgery for the early part of the summer.
Key silver support at $15 was shattered. JP Morgan and HSBC are smiling, looking for another kill. And people wonder how The Gold Cartel has made money during the bull markets of the past nine years … 50 cents here, 50 cents there … $3 here, $3 there. JP Morgan ought to be called The Fleece Patrol.
CNBC televised a presentation by Larry Summers at The Council on Foreign Relations in Washington. I wanted to throw up. He is a hypocritical, lying, bombastic buffoon. One day the world will see him for who he really is. Talk about an understatement…
end
Over the past 5 weeks, the Fed has increased in balance sheet by 233 billion dollars.
They have increased their own holdings of paper to 1.13 trillion dollars for a 5 day gain of 19 billion dollars and a 5 week gain of a huge 144 billion dollars.
Foreigners have bought a further 89 billion dollars of agency and other Treasuries.
This is what is causing turmoil in the 10 yr treasury and 30 yr treasury and as such the volatility is killing JPMorgan et al. end
Give me a break: this is what Summers stated today:
Summers says U.S. acts in markets when necessary
By Robert Schroeder
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- The U.S. acts in markets only when necessary and is trying to save them from their own excesses and improve them, White House National Economic Council Director Larry Summers said Friday. "The actions we take are those of necessity, not of choice," Summers said in remarks prepared for delivery at the Council on Foreign Relations. He said President Barack Obama didn't run for office to manage banks, insurance companies or auto manufacturers.http://www.marketwatch.com/story/summers-says-us
-acts-in-markets-when-necessary-2009612111550?siteid=rss-END-
Here are some closing commodity and dollar prices yesterday:
The dollar rose .69 to 80.24 as the euro felll .0122 to 1.4001.
The yield on the 10 yr T note dropped to 3.78%.
Copper finished down 7 cents to $2.3675 per pound.
Crude oil only lost 64 cents to $72.04 per barrel.
The CRB gave only 3.62 to 262.55.
As you can see, the printed dollars went in support of the dollar, and short oil, gold, silver and basically all the crb components.
This next passage intrigues me. First the passage:
Intervention is everywhere and awareness of it all is growing...
Zero Hedge Exclusive: Is State Street Trading For Federal Accounts?
Posted by Tyler Durden at 9:54 AMZero Hedge has always been fascinated by the behemoths of securities lending (or not so much lately) State Street and Bank Of New York: these firms, which allegedly had just marginal toxic exposure, were in the front lines for the TARP bailout and have traditionally been handled with velvet gloves by the administration. In fact, many would say the custodian firms are in a league of importance much higher than even Goldman or JP Morgan as with their repo activity, security lending and cash collateral reinvestment, they are the de facto center of the shadow banking system…
http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/06/zero-he
dge-exclusive-is-state-street.html
end.
The rumours seem to indicate that the Fed has entered into the repo pool of lending out securities through State Street.
I bring this up because State Street is one of the custodians of the GLD and SLV along with Barclays.
Maybe this is why the Fed is getting involved in this arena. end
The first quarter has not been kind to Americans:
1st quarter wiped out $1.3 trillion for Americans
First 3 months of 2009 wiped out $1.3 trillion, driving Americans' net worth to '04 levels
Jeannine Aversa, AP Economics Writer
On Thursday June 11, 2009, 6:03 pm EDT
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The brute force of the recession earlier this year turned back the clock on Americans' personal wealth to 2004 and wiped out a staggering $1.3 trillion as home values shrank and investments withered.
Net worth, or the value of assets such as homes, checking accounts and investments minus debts like mortgages and credit cards, declined 2.6 percent in the first three months of the year, the Federal Reserve said Thursday.
Those months were some of the worst of the recession so far for job losses, and the stock market sank to its lowest point of the year in March. Since then, some signs suggest the economy is stabilizing.
Still, partly because of the carnage earlier in the recession, Americans are putting plans on hold until the economy improves.
B. Smith, a conductor for a Chicago commuter rail line, is waiting to buy cars for two of his children. He spent $260,000 to build his suburban Chicago home about 10 years ago and watched its value spike to $380,000 in January 2008. Today, it stands at about $310,000. "I'm still ahead, but I'm not as ahead as I was before," he said.
Even if things improve, such a dramatic evaporation of wealth will probably make Americans more thrifty down the road, said Scott Hoyt, senior director of consumer economics at Moody's Economy.com.
"The bulk of consumers alive today have not experienced declines in wealth like this," Hoyt said. "They are already turning thrifty, and it will stay that way beyond the short term. This has been a significant learning experience."
Americans' personal savings rate zoomed to 5.7 percent in April, the highest since 1995. And the amount in savings -- $620.2 billion -- was the most on record dating to January 1959.
One way to save: Maurice Boler, a management consultant, said he does many repairs himself on his Indianapolis home rather than pay someone else. "I just take a little bit longer," said the 53-year-old father of four, three of whom live at home.
Even if the economy recovers and starts to thrive again, he said he probably won't break out the credit cards again. "It's really not about stuff," he said. "Stuff is nice, but life is not about how much more stuff can we get."
According to the Fed report, the biggest damage to wealth in the first quarter came from the sinking stock market. The value of Americans' stock holdings dropped almost 6 percent from the final quarter of last year -- in a market that was already brutal.
The Wall Street slide that began in 2007 wiped out more than half the value of the U.S. stock market, but investments have bounced back. Since the end of the period covered by the Fed report, the Standard & Poor's 500 stock index is up 20 percent.
Rick Thompson, 77, a retired broker from Huntingdon Valley, Pa., isn't losing sleep over the economy or the stock market despite seeing his net worth edge lower in recent months.
He and his wife, Faith, own the four-bedroom house where they've lived for 40 years. It may have lost some of its value, but not much, he said. A conservative investor, he shifted most of their portfolio from stocks to bonds in late 2007, when the then-soaring market made him uneasy.
He admits the recession has weighed on his psyche, but the rise in stocks since early March has lifted his spirits. Thanks to the Wall Street rally, they are going ahead with plans for a trip to Europe next year.
Another hit to household net worth in the first quarter came from falling house prices. The value of real-estate holdings fell 2.4 percent, according to the Fed report.
Collectively, homeowners had only 41.4 percent equity in their homes in the first quarter, the lowest on record dating to 1945, as Americans fell behind on mortgages or entered foreclosure. That was down from 42.9 percent in the fourth quarter.
The Case-Shiller national home price index, a closely watched barometer, last month estimated that house prices dropped 7.5 percent during the first quarter and have fallen more than 32 percent from their 2006 peak.
While the first quarter was ugly, the hit to Americans' net worth was worse late last year. In the October-December period, it fell a record 8.6 percent, according to revised figures. That was the largest drop on record dating to 1951.
If Americans continue to spend -- no guarantee -- Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and other economists say they think the recession will end late this year. But if shoppers hunker down and cut spending again, that could delay any recovery. Late last year, Americans cut spending at the fastest rate in 28 years.
On Thursday, there was encouraging news: Retail sales rose slightly in May following two straight monthly declines, the Commerce Department reported. And the number of newly laid-off workers filing for unemployment fell by the lowest number since late January.
Kathy Bullard, a librarian in Providence, R.I., said she plans to be even more frugal in the coming months. At 58, with a 10 percent pay cut coming on July 1 and her pension plan frozen, she doesn't expect to buy more new clothes or books anytime soon.
"I have no idea what my net worth is," she said. "It would probably just depress me."
AP Business Writers Tim Paradis in New York, Dave Carpenter and Karen Hawkins in Chicago, Deanna Martin in Indianapolis and Kelsey Abbruzzese in Providence, R.I., contributed.
end.
The usa banks are still weakening:
MSNBC.com
Most banks still weakening, analysis shows
First-quarter reports show bad loans increasing at 60% of banks
By Bill Dedman
Investigative reporter
Bad loans on real estate continue to push harder on the nation's banks.
At the end of the first quarter, six out of every 10 banks in the U.S. were less well prepared to withstand their potential loan losses than they had been at the end of 2008, according to a new analysis by msnbc.com and the Investigative Reporting Workshop at American University in Washington. Overall, bad loans rose another 22 percent in the quarter as the recession continued.
Msnbc.com is publishing information on the nation's 400 largest banks as well as all banks with high ratios of troubled loans to assets. Information on the financial health of more than 8,000 banks nationwide is available at the updatedBankTracker site published by the American University group.
The analysis relies on information reported through March 31 to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., calculating each bank's troubled asset ratio, which compares troubled loans against the bank's capital and loan loss reserves. A similar ratio, known as a Texas Ratio, is commonly used by bank analysts as a snapshot of a bank's financial health, though it can't capture all the nuances of a bank's condition.
Although much attention has been focused on surprising profits at U.S. banks in the first quarter of 2009, under the surface lurks an industry still suffering from the recession. If you set aside the 10 largest banks, the rest of the industry lost money in the quarter, primarily because of very large losses at a few banks.
While the 10 largest banks reported $10.2 billion in earnings for the quarter, the remaining 8,245 banks together lost $2.6 billion, according to the analysis.
One in five banks lost money in the quarter, and several lost big, weighing down the rest.
Four large banks account for more than $5 billion in losses. Huntington National Bank of Columbus, Ohio, lost $2.46 billion. FIA Card Services of Wilmington, Del., lost $1.47 billion. SunTrust Bank of Atlanta lost $783 million. Sovereign Bank of Wyomissing, Pa., lost $764 million.
What's the trend in bad loans?
Continuing the trend from 2008, there was a significant deterioration in the first quarter in the ability of banks to withstand potential losses from troubled loans.
If a troubled asset ratio of 100 is a sign of severe stress, then an additional 93 banks moved past that level in the quarter, for a total of 237. Still, that's only 3 percent of the nation's banks.
Some analysts have said that any ratio over 20 percent is an early warning sign. An additional 421 banks moved past that level, for a total of 2,692. That's 33 percent of the nation's banks.
While the troubled asset ratio is not a predictor of bank failure, 29 of the 37banks that have failed so far this year had ratios of greater than 100 percent, reported Wendell Cochran, senior editor of the reporting project at American University.
Most banks still have relatively low levels of troubled loans. But there was a worsening of the median troubled asset ratio for all banks, rising to 11.7 at the end of the quarter, up from 9.8 at year end 2008, and 4.9 at year-end 2007, when only one-quarter of the nation's metro areas were in recession.
The reports in most cases do not include the billions in federal money injected onto the balance sheets of bank holding companies in the form of so-called TARP funds. Although the public was told by members of Congress that one of the purposes of the TARP program was to increase lending, in nearly all cases that money has stayed with the bank holding companies as a cushion against hard times, and has not been passed on to their individual banks where it might be used to make loans. In fact, the total of loans outstanding declined again in the quarter as the recession continued…-END-
I will leave you with Bill Holters commentary on the subject of gold. He echoes my views totally:
Bill H:
One Ounce Of Gold In
German Markets
January 1919 170
September 1919 499
January 1920 1,340
September 1920 1,201
January 1921 1,349
September 1921 2,175
January 1922 3,976
September 1922 30,381
January 1923 372,477
September 1923 269,439,000
Oct 2, 1923 6,631,749,000
Oct 9, 1923 24,868,950,000
Oct 16, 1923 84,969,072,000
Oct 23, 1923 1,160,552,882,000
Oct 30, 1923 1,347,070,000,000
Nov 5, 1923 8,700,000,000,000
Nov 30, 1923 87,000,000,000,000Source: CIBC World Markets
To all; the above "Gold prices" were the result of German monetary policy from 1919 to 1923. It is very important to understand that I put "Gold prices" in quotes because this is how we Americans think. This is completely wrongheaded thinking. The truth of the matter is that German Reichmarks were valued in Gold ounces and the German currency collapsed in value, thus the amount of currency necessary to purchase 1 ounce of Gold exploded exponentially. Gold did not "go up", the Reichmark imploded.
We think in terms of Gold went up or down today when we should be thinking the Dollar went up or down. An ounce of Gold 200 years ago is still that same ounce of Gold today. 200 years ago Dollars did not exist, they may not exist in the near future. The point is that Gold or Silver is a constant or a measuring stick for other goods and for paper currencies, not vice versa.
Looking at the above numbers is certainly startling. I read about the Weimar Republic years ago (not in college because this is not something Americans "need" to know) and I knew the currency went to zero. What I did not know was how fast it really happened! In 3 years the Reichmark dropped 95% vs. Gold, it only took another 21 months to become worthless. Think about the numbers above. 87 trillion RM's for one ounce, 87 trillion?! You may be wondering why I am posting this. I am not trying to show you that you will become "rich" or that you will retain your purchasing power by owning Gold, by now I think we all understand the many reasons to own Gold and that hyperinflation and destruction of the Dollar is virtually a given.
I show you this because many people have asked me "what is our exit strategy"? This is always a logical question to ask and one that is always necessary when you first enter into an investment. I believe that what lies ahead of us will in no way resemble 1980 when Gold spiked and then plunged, only to barely tread water for the next 20 years. My thoughts are; that since the global currency markets are Dollar based, once the fiat Ponzi scheme collapses we will have plenty of time to survey the lay of the land and make intelligent investments from that point without time pressure to get out before Gold crashes again. Why do I believe it will be different this time? Simple, people will not trust another fiat currency again during our lifetimes because of the wealth destruction that has and will occur due to "funny money". Gold will be seen again for what it always has been, MONEY and a the ultimate store of value.
Because we live in a world with computers that provide instant information and communication, I believe the potential for a virtual 2 week tsunami of value destruction has a very good possibility of occurring. I see only one possible alternative. Once the "powers that be" see that Dollar destruction is imminent, I believe a new currency will be unveiled. Gold will be the new foundation and will be marked up accordingly, 10 to 1, 100 to one, 1000, etc. I have no idea what the number is, but it will be eye popping. I also believe the longer this is postponed the greater the mark up will be.
There have been many very well respected people throwing out Dollar/Gold numbers such as $1,650, $3,000, $6,500 and even higher than $10,000. I pay no attention to these numbers and think that anyone offering up a number is fooling themselves. There are just too many variables to arrive at a $/Gold number. Do we really know how many Dollars exist now that money supply is no longer reported? No. Do we have any idea how many synthetic Dollars exist in the derivatives markets? No. We do know that the government says they have over 8,000 tonnes of Gold, should we believe them? (I'll leave this one up to you). But what if there is only 4,000 tonnes, or 1,000? Or God forbid, what if it is all gone!? As I said, too many what if's. The only thing we do know for sure is that even if we believe every ounce of Gold is still in Ft. Knox, there is nowhere near enough to support the "admitted" money supply with each Dollar priced at 1/1,000 th per ounce.
I wanted to show you the Weimar experience because it is visually shocking. It is certainly a scary thought if Gold were to require $87 trillion to purchase one ounce. It is also important to screw our heads on straight as to thinking about Gold in Dollar terms since we know (were taught) no other way. When all is said and done, we will have to "relearn" how to value assets in terms of ounces rather than in how many pieces of paper with how many zeros.
The funny thing is that you don't even have to believe me or what I have said, just listen to Ben Bernanke, Tim Geithner, and our new President. They have told you exactly what they plan to do. They will borrow more (until there is no more) and they will use the electronic printing presses. When these begin to fail, then the real Weimar will emerge, the Fed will simply print more Dollars to purchase Treasury bonds that were left unsold because the world did not want them. In tandem the Dollar and Treasuries will go down the Weimar rat hole together unless and until we get a new currency that has Gold backing and the government completely restructures itself (read, banckruptcy) going forward with manageable and balanced budgets.
I will leave you with a couple of questions. Do you know of anyone (country, corporation, or individual) that went through bankruptcy with assets entirely of Gold bullion and no liabilities? During Weimar, Argentina, USSR, US 1930's, Zimbabwe, Iceland, US present (Zimbabwe II)? Were these not the absolute worst economic times in the last 100 years? Has anyone EVER gone broke owning nothing but paid for and in possession Gold? No, no, no, and double no! Regards, Bill H.
end
I wish you all a grand weekend.
and I will speak to you on Monday.
Harvey
