www.lemetropolecafe.com
Good evening Ladies and Gentlemen:
Gold closed up by 5.00 to 773.00. Silver fell by 15 cents to 9.81.
The open interest on gold comex rose a bit yesterday up by 400 contracts to 262800. Silver’s Oi also rose by a scant 147 contracts to 83000.
Today, libor rates in usa funds fell slightly to 2.16%. However lease rates on silver 3 months out rose to 2.26%. On seeing these figures, I wanted to see if silver went into backwardation. Lo and behold it did. Silver closed at spot prices higher than in the future months.
For gold, we had a slight contango.
At the silver and gold pits, there were no changes in deliveries.
The big news came from the banks participation report. In silver, two banks represent over 98% of the commercial short position.
This is flagrantly against comex policy and shows manipulation by these two banks. I will highlight the important passages for you:
this is the reason for the criminal probe against silver by the CFTC law enforcement people.). This is from Gene Arensberg:
"On the fly" Gold And Silver COT Information
re
The Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) release of its Bank Participation in Futures Markets on the first reporting week of the month. The figures for December are out.
The concentration in gold is ridiculous, but the horrendous acting silver market is beyond scandalous. From Gene A’s report:
For silver, it’s even more startling. On December 2, as silver closed at $9.57, exactly 2 U.S. banks held a net short positioning of 24,555 contracts. The CFTC reports that as of the same date all traders classed as commercial held a net short positioning of 24,894 contracts. So, the 2 U.S. banks, with one particular Fed member bank probably holding almost all of it, held a sickening 98.64% of all the collective commercial net short positioning on the COMEX, division of NYMEX in New York.
Here’s what the miscreant banks’ positioning looks like on a graph:

Source CFTC for Bank Participation, Cash Market for silver.
Exactly two U.S. banks have practically all the COMEX commercial net short positioning on silver. For a little context, 24,555 net short contracts means that the two banks held net short positions on December 2 for 122,775,000 ounces of silver with silver at $9.57. The COMEX said on December 4, that there were 80,239,857 ounces total in the "Registered" category, so these 2 malefactor banks held net short positioning equal to about 153% of the amount of deliverable silver in ALL the COMEX members’ accounts…
http://www.resourceinvestor.com/pebble.asp?relid=48524
-END-
We already have feedback from the CFTC that one of those positions was a result of a takeover, which clearly was JP Morgan Chase taking on the SHORT position of Bear Stearns. What is the point of having anti-trust laws if this is allowed to stand, especially when the physical retail market is so tight, and coin premiums are at historic high levels? If this sort of information doesn’t prove GATA’s point, nothing ever will. This is no hedging operation, it is the United States Government suppressing the price of silver in unlawful fashion to suit its own agenda.
And that is the problem with Bart Chilton’s investigation of the silver market. He is investigating his own government. How does he tell them to bugger off? Seems to me the only way to carry on here is to go to the Justice Department. What else does he have to investigate? It is all there in their own government stats.
It is beyond bizarre. Hardly any dealers are short silver because they know of the real shortage, so the US Government has become THE SHORT. What kind of free market is that?
Bart Chilton has been very cordial in answering numerous emails, unlike anyone else in Washington I have come across over the last decade. He has to be commended for that. However, it is time for him to get off the pot and do something. There is nothing else to investigate. He only needs to demand JP Morgan Chase reduce a much too concentrated short position, one which has the silver market dysfunctional.
He ought to do so for his own good and for the good of our financial markets. This sort of chicanery and utter price suppression nonsense will not stand too much longer. It wouldn’t take much to blow up the silver Comex market up. That kind of ramification could lead to very serious financial market consequences, putting the integrity of all our financial exchanges in question. We have enough trouble with our financial markets at the moment. No one needs that.
Mr. Bart Chilton can be reached here:
BChilton@CFTC.gov
You will note that the net commercial shorts by one or two banks in silver is about 122,750,000 oz. The number of contracts short by the commercial entities are 24,555 or approximately 98% of the entire commercial short interest.
On top of this, backwardation is rearing its ugly head at the cartel. JPMorgan is probably staring into an abyss.
They are caught red handed!!!
The ECB just announced sales of gold for the week. They came in at 2 tonnes of gold or 42million euros worth of gold.
Certainly, Euroland is not responsible for gold sales. Here is the link:
he ECB’s weekly statement of condition indicates that “gold and gold receivables” fell E42Mm last week, which “reflected” sales by two captive CBs. This is 2.08 tonnes at the current book value. Last week two CBs were said to have sold 5.7 tonnes. The ECB echelon of CBs apparently does not care to even approach the 9.6 tonne weekly average notionally possible under WAG2. Perhaps we will see a sale from the ECB itself, which for some reason are announced separately. With a new WAG2 year, this would be possible.
Yesterday’s $17.10 (2.3%) gain for Comex gold saw only 466 lots added to open interest (0.02%, or 1.45 tonnes). Apparently there was almost as much short covering as outright buying. The steadiness of open interest – in the 260,000s all month so far – is becoming notable.
Today’s $4.90 Comex gain incorporated a sell-off at the start and a brief attempt on $780, for an $18.20 range. Estimated volume, however was only 72,555 lots, with a switch effect of 8,836.
Although Comex gold has gained $22 in the past two business days, MarketVane’s Bullish Consensus has only risen three points, to 58%. Novembers 13’s 49% low was the lowest for several years. On the other hand, Mark Hulbert’s survey of gold-timing newsletters is being interpreted negatively by him. See
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/Still-a-
bullishness-among-gold/story.aspx?guid=%7BF85CD
0F1%2D85E3%2D476E%2D9650%2D2429ED2FFBD5%7D
As for economic news, I highlighted 3 articles for you:
U.S. consumer confidence falls in December - IBD
NEW YORK, Dec 9 (Reuters) - U.S. consumer confidence fell in December, hurt by worry over the condition of the auto industry, news of big job losses and recent confirmation the economy is in recession, a survey released on Tuesday said.
Investor's Business Daily and TechnoMetrica Market Intelligence said their IBD/TIPP Economic Optimism Index fell 5.8 points, or 11.4 percent, to reach 45 in December.
The index is 2.5 points above its 12-month average of 42.5 and just 6.5 points below its all-time average of 51.5.
Index readings above 50 indicate optimism; below 50 point to pessimism.
-END-
U.S. Oct pending home sales slip 0.7 percent - NAR
WASHINGTON, Dec 9 (Reuters) - Pending sales of existing U.S. homes fell by a smaller-than-expected margin in October, data showed on Tuesday, raising cautious optimism of some stability in the distressed housing market.
The National Association of Realtors Pending Home Sales Index, based on contracts signed in October, slipped 0.7 percent to 88.9 from an upwardly revised reading of 89.5 in September.
October's reading was 1.0 percent lower than a year earlier. Economists polled by Reuters ahead of the report were expecting pending home sales to drop 3.2 percent. Pending sales declined by a revised 4.3 percent in September.
-END-
U.S. economic slowdown seen continuing in 2009-ISM
NEW YORK, Dec 9 (Reuters) - Economic growth in the Untied States will vary by industry and sector in 2009, the nation's purchasing and supply management executives said in their December 2008 semiannual economic forecast released on Tuesday.
The "adverse conditions" experienced in the second half of 2008 are expected to continue in 2009 in manufacturing, the Institute for Supply Management said. The non-manufacturing sector foresees marginal growth during the same period.
The overall forecast "lacks the sense of optimism that purchasing and supply managers have typically expressed about the U.S. economy in their annual forecasts," the organization said.
The manufacturing sector overall is pessimistic about prospects for 2009 with revenues expected to decline in 12 of 18 industries, while the non-manufacturing sector appears more positive about the year ahead with eight out of 18 industries expecting higher-than-average revenues.
Business investment, a major driver of the U.S. economy, is expected to decline, with two sectors seeing a combined 7.6 percent drop in capital spending.
-END
Daan Joubert has released his version on the backwardation issue on gold and silver comex. It is self explanatory.
I have highlighted the important passage for you:
South Africa’s Daan Joubert and some explanation on backwardization, Antal Fekete's commentary and the latest flap over it…
I earlier had some questions regarding the Fekete essay, in effect saying that he is a bit too theoretical for easy understanding. I'll try to elaborate on the specific point he is making. It all has to do with the concept of backwardation (BW) and when/why it arises. You can simply read my comments and interpretation in isolation or first read the Fekete essay (Dos Passos Table) - or read it after looking through my comments.
In principle, but not in fact, the futures price of a commodity is always greater than the spot or current price.
A futures price relative to the spot price is a function of two main factors: the risk-free interest rate and the duration of the futures contract. These factors combine into a measure that reflect the time value of money in terms of the cost of a transaction to have ownership of the commodity. Ownership can be either immediate - by a purchase at the spot price - or through purchase of a future and then taking delivery at some later time.
Assume that a single grain contract is equal to 100 bushels, with the grain trading at $100 a bushel; margin is $10/bushel and the contract has 1 month to go before delivery can be taken. Assume that the contract is currently also trading at $100 with delivery happening in one month's time.
Someone who needs 100 bushels of that grain 1 month from now has two options - he can buy the 100 bushels on the open market and store the grain for one month. Doing so will require an outlay of $100 to do the purchase (and some storage cost, which we will consider to be negligible.)
Alternatively, he can buy one contract at the current value of $100, with margin of $10 as the outlay. That leaves him $90 of his capital on which to draw interest, One month from now he takes delivery of the 100 bushels, which then costs him $100 ($10 margin and the $90 that has been drawing interest) and this leaves him with a profit equal to the amount of interest he has earned.
It is easy to see that with spot and the one month contract both costing $100 that everyone with any financial sense will buy the contract for $10 down as margin, and earn interest on the additional $90 that would have been needed for the purchase. In order to balance the choice between the commodity and the future, the future would be priced higher simply by demand - and the price premium in principle would be equal to the amount of interest that can be earned on $90/contract.
This reasoning can be extended to saying that the longer the duration of the contract, the higher will be the premium - basically because a longer premium allows a longer time for the difference between the margin and the actual price to draw interest. A future with 3 months to expiry enables the $90 in the above example to be invested for 3 months, earning interest. Purchase of a 6-month contract will deliver interest for 6 months, etc.
Where this sequence for higher prices, starting with spot, is broken, the condition is known as backwardation (BW) While it can occur at any point within the sequence of futures of longer duration, it most often happens between the price and the closest contract - although it can extend to additional contracts, starting with the next nearest expiration.
Fekete writes about gold that went into BW for the first time in history. Why would a commodity go into BW?
If spot is higher than the nearest future - say with one month to go before it expires - it means that people are willing to forgo the potential profit of buying the contract in favour of buying the actual commodity right now. The most obvious example occurs in the case of an industrial commodity.
Say, for example, that a factory uses a good deal of copper in its operation and cannot operate at all without it.
It has enough supply at hand for the next month, but would then have to have a new supply to continue operation.
As in the example above, the owner has two options: purchase the copper and store it or buy a futures contract for one month and take delivery when it expires.
Under normal circumstances the price of the futures contract will be higher than spot, as described above.
Now think a little before reading further - what kind of condition would have to exist for the owner to forgo the interest offered by the futures contract by buying the actual copper at the higher spot price; which by the fact that it is higher means he loses out on a good deal of interest.Keep in mind that the commodity is not needed until the end of the month.
The only logical reason is that if he buys the copper he knows he has it on site; but he believes that he might not be able to get delivery if he went for the contract - and then his factory grinds to a halt. So, giving his knowledge of the very tight conditions in the copper market he has some reason to believe that if he buys the contract, his counter party might not be able to deliver the copper one month form now.
In other words, a commodity goes into BW when users of that commodity believe supply to be so tight that they may not be able to effect delivery when they try to do so. Now for an important point: for BW to persist, all major players in the market has to share that belief. To illustrate:
Assume that copper spot is at $11/lb and the one month contract is at $10/lb - a case of backwardation. Let there be a player that sits on 1000 lbs of copper he does not himself need immediately, but will need in one month's time. If he is certain he can replace the copper after one month in the commodities exchange, he can do the following: sell the copper in the sport market for $11/lb and receive $11 000. At 10% margin he uses $1000 of that money to buy a futures contract that will deliver the same amount of copper at $10/lb. He invests the remaining $10 000 and earns interest on it for one month and then uses $9000 of the capital to pay for his 1000 lbs of copper when he takes delivery. he has the $1000 profit on the transaction as well as the interest he has earned on the $10 000.
So if BW persists, it means there is nobody out there who
a) has copper he does not need to use for some period of time and
b) believes that if he did sell the copper he can replace it by taking delivery on a futures contract.
To sum up - if BW exists and persists, we know that the above applies to all players in the market who do own that commodity and who do not intend to use it for some length of time. BW is a sign of a very tight market in that commodity and most probably prospects of it being tight for some time.
But gold is not a consumable commodity, like copper or grain or any other industrial commodity.
Only jewelers 'use up' a significant amount of gold so that they have to go into the spot market in order to keep operations going when he fears that delivery may not take place if he went the futures route. But gold used for jewelry is only a small amount of the gold that is traded - the London Bullion Market have claimed that their daily volume is many hundreds of tons; often a 1000 tons - therefore many millions of times more than the daily conversion of gold into jewelry. So why should the jewelers want to buy gold right now at a price substantially higher than that one month from now?
Gold of course has another role - it is a store of value. A hedge against uncertainty and risk.
If people who invest in gold for these reasons are willing to pay more immediately than to obtain gold by means of a delivery on the futures exchange,it means two things:
a) There are enough people so concerned about non-delivery that they will pay a large premium to get their hands on gold right now
b) There are no large holders of gold who have sufficient faith in the futures exchange to exploit the BW, as described above.
That reveals enough as to why gold has gone into backwardation, albeit perhaps only briefly.Fekete wrote about the BW on December 2 and 3. At
http://www.nymex.com/gol_fut_cso.aspx are the December 5 closing futures prices for months Dec 2008 - Aug 2009
Spot is $754.30 (per Kitco) and this is higher than the Dec, Jan, Feb and April futures, which range from $750.50 to $753.70, (No March contract)so backwardation is still in place, and out to the April contract - getting very substantial now. The June contract is $755.20.
The longer this persists - and the farther it goes out into the future - the more damning it is in terms of there being no holder of gold who is willing to take the risk of selling into the spot market and then replacing the gold through a futures contract. That says more than enough about the tightness of the market and, by implication, the risk that sellers of gold contracts will go into default when they are asked to deliver on the futures they had sold.
It is possible that the situation can reverse - that someone can obtain enough gold from somewhere to sell into the spot market WITH strong and certain belief that when the time comes to take delivery on the contracts that were purchased to replenish the gold he has sold, his contracts will be honoured. The possibility of that happening seems remote, but not impossible.
2008 has just over three weeks to go and can still become most interesting!!
If BW persists, 2009 promises to be a golden year.
Daan
Daan is correct. Should we get a more serious and lasting gold/silver backwardiztion, it will be a sign the prices of gold and silver will go bananas. Nothing could be more bullish, especially in light of all that has been brought to your attention the past few months.
For a couple of weeks now I have noted the nearby tightness, even backwardization, at times, but have seen none of it in the back months. Perhaps, this is the beginning and how a full blown backwardization will occur. I sure hope that is the case. end
Tonight, there is talk that Italy is behind the talks to sell 2000 tonnes of gold Yesterday we heard about the IMF and today Italy.
For our vantage point, Italy has already leased all of its gold. As for the IMF, none of their gold is allocated . Even if they had allocated gold, congress needs to approve of the IMF sale and with the world in turmoil, I doubt that congress would approve the sale.
In summation, it looks to us that the only suppliers of precious metals silver and gold is JPMorgan (at the comex). All other participants have left. The kitchen is getting a little to hot for them.
They also see first hand,backwardation and they know that spells trouble. If the comex survives December, then February will kill off the cartel in gold and March, it will be silver. It is possible for January as many will roll forward their March contracts for fear of not getting metal. They will roll into option related contracts.
Stay tuned to this one!!