From: Harvey Organ
Sent: October-01-08 5:33 PM
To: 'Chilton, Bart'
Cc: don jack; Robert G. Hryniak
Subject: RE: gold and silver manipulation
Dear Mr Chilton:
I have been away in Europe so please forgive my late reply to your email to me informing us of the CFTC probe on the silver manipulation.
In my email to you in August, there was no doubt in my or anybody else’s mind, that collusion, manipulation and fraud were a major part in the shorting of silver by two major banks as published by the CFTC’s report on the Participation on Banks.
I asked for an explanation as to what happened. This is the first time I can ever recall that the crime is still being perpetrated on investors and an investigation has commenced. Generally, the crime stops the event and then the probe determines what happened. Yesterday, we saw silver fall in excess of one dollar as the collusive banks continued to short silver. Today they covered, and this process has been ongoing with the same modus operandi for the last 8 years.
Mr Chilton, we do not need a probe, we just need an explanation as to what happened . Two banks sold short 140 million oz of silver on July 6.08 ( 20% of worldly production) and then forced the silver price down to the low 10 dollar level. In the real world, we saw mints around the world run out of metal and the real physical price of silver was averaging approximately.15.80 to 18.00 per oz. The Canadian mint could not produce maple leafs. The South African mint could no longer produce Krugerrands, the worlds most popular gold coin as supplies of gold had run out.
I can tell you that my son Leonard was at the Bank of Nova Scotia vault and counted the amount of working supply of gold and silver. Amazingly, there was none or zero ounces of 1 oz, 5 oz, 10 oz, 100 oz silver bars and only 60 1000 oz bars that have since been sold. Further, there was only 84,000 oz of gold.
I have been informed that the Bank of Nova Scotia acts as a depository for all silver certificates issued by all banks in Canada.
A few days ago, the CFTC released data on 5500 contracts of silver leaving the comex. The amount of silver equated to I believe 26,500,000.000 oz of silver. I find the movement strange in that silver bars are exact weight and in 3 decimals. E.g. 26,500,003.03 oz.. It seems that the comex has now electronic silver instead of real silver which should help explain the massive fraud upon us.
It looks to me that we have 1 inventory of real silver covering both the SLV over in London and the comex in NY.
This is what needs to be explained . Billions of dollars have been lost by ordinary small investors and the dollars flowed criminally to the two banks in question. Mr Chilton, we are small investors compared to the giant banks. We need regulators to protect us from activities which seem suspect.
Mr Chilton, we need to now in an expedited fashion what happened.
It looks like there is a good probability of a default in December for the silver contracts as many physical dealers cannot get their metal. I guess all hell will break loose. The truth now will save your department a lot of grief.
Sir, I applaud your decision to commence an investigation. However, we do not need another whitewashing of the explanation of the manipulation.
I urge you to resolve these difficulties forthwith.
Harvey B Organ.
From: Chilton, Bart [mailto:BChilton@CFTC.gov]
Sent: September-25-08 11:03 AM
To: Harvey Organ
Subject: RE: gold and silver manipulation
I wanted to take a moment to send you a news article from today’s Wall Street Journal regarding an investigation that has been opened by the CFTC related to silver. This investigation was prompted by you and others who wrote to the Commission about the matter.
As I have said, the CFTC needs to do a better job. I think this investigation is a strong step in that direction and will allow a fresh and detailed look into the silver markets. It may interest you to learn that the individual in charge of the team effort is a veteran investigator who has handled many successful enforcement cases – including the largest settlement case in the CFTC’s history. I have tremendous confidence in the Division of Enforcement team that is beginning to look at the issues surrounding silver. Commissioners will be confidentially updated on the progress of the investigation as it goes forward.
Thank you again for your interest. I will try to contact you again when there is anything of significance that can be announced to the public.
B
CFTC Relents and Probes Silver Market
Persistent Complaints of Foul Play Draw the Still-Skeptical Agency to Investigate
Wall Street Journal – September 25, 2008
By CAROLYN CUI
With silver prices falling this past summer, silver bugs world-wide set out to prove that their metal was in short supply and market manipulation was at work. They bombarded federal regulators with hundreds of emails crying foul play and demanded answers.
Though such pleas proved futile in the past, this time the rousing chorus grabbed regulators' attention. On Wednesday, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission confirmed that there's an investigation into the silver market.
The CFTC isn't yet convinced there's systemic wrongdoing and in May published a report saying as much. But the agency decided to take a fresh look, in part to show critics that it checks out complaints, and also to make sure there isn't something new to uncover.
"We take the threat of manipulation in the futures and options markets very seriously and employ a number of measures to prevent, identify and prosecute it," said Stephen Obie, acting director of the agency's division of enforcement.
Silver investors have argued that a handful of U.S. banks have been controlling a large portion of silver's short positions -- or bets that prices will decline -- on Comex division of the New York Mercantile Exchange. Official data from the CFTC showed that two U.S. banks had increased short positions in the silver futures market between July and August by 450% and controlled 25% of the total open interest.
"The proof that this selloff was criminal lies in public data," wrote Theodore Butler of Cape Elizabeth, Maine, in August in a silver newsletter. "The concentrated sale of such quantities in such a short time" caused silver's fall, wrote Mr. Butler, who for many years has been vocal about purported silver-market manipulation. In September he reiterated to readers that they should email the CFTC.
The CFTC had argued in May that the large banks that people assailed for manipulating the market were instead acting appropriately as market makers, who take on futures positions to offset their exposure in over-the-counter markets. Therefore, these traders aren't "naked shorts" and won't benefit from long-term depressed silver prices. Many analysts agree with the agency's conclusion.
Silver stalwarts weren't persuaded. Jason Hommel, a newsletter writer based in Penn Valley, Calif., directed readers to visit their local coin shops at 2 p.m. on Sept. 2 to size up for themselves whether there was a silver shortage. From Michigan to North Carolina and beyond, he says, investors trekked to coin shops. Many reported no silver for sale.
Bart Chilton, one of the CFTC commissioners, said he has received about 700 emails from silver investors since August, far more than the estimated 100 he received from May to July. Mr. Chilton, a Democrat who has criticized the CFTC as doing a poor job communicating with consumers, says he has spent nights and weekends personally answering emails.
Historically, silver has been a volatile market. This year it saw a near-50% drop and remains down 9.5% on the year. Gold is up 6.5%. The agency has long heard from frustrated silver investors. In 2004, it published an open letter by Michael Gorham, then the agency's director of market oversight, after receiving more than 500 letters and emails from silver investors.
That the enforcement rather than oversight division is taking on the issue marks a difference from the CFTC's previous efforts regarding the silver market. The oversight division performs overall market surveillance. The enforcement division looks at activities in a specific time period.
Bart Chilton, Commissioner
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5060
Fax: (202) 418-5620
cftc.gov
From: Harvey Organ [mailto:harveyorgan@rogers.com]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 8:26 PM
To: Chilton, Bart
Subject: RE: gold and silver manipulation
Dear Sir:
I would appreciate it very much if you read my complaint in full. Please note that there was an increase in silver short of 138 million oz and in gold of 7.8 million oz. With respect to silver there is only one source of silver on the planet that that quantity of silver and that is the SLV over in London England. There is no doubt that the two banks leased an additional 138 million oz on top of their 30 million oz short from the SLV.
The problem is that this inventory belongs to the owners of the SLV who bought the SLV as an investment thinking silver was going to rise. They would not take kindly if this paper short caused them irreparable harm.
I urge you to please read my complaint and not give me a `form` response.
Could you please investigate in detail my complaint and answer forthwith.
Harvey B Organ
298 Russell Hill Rd
Toronto Ontario
416 928 0898
Email: harveyorgan@rogers.com
From: Chilton, Bart [mailto:BChilton@CFTC.gov]
Sent: August-24-08 4:08 PM
To: Harvey Organ
Subject: RE: gold and silver manipulation
Dear Mr. Organ:
Thank you for your e-mail. I have been asking the professionals here to look at these things since last year. As you may know, there was a letter (it is on our web site) that looked at many of these issues this year. I think that letter is due to people like you who contacted me and my requests to the Chairman of the Commission to investigate these matters. As you know, I am one of five Commissioners and do not have discretion to instruct staff to perform certain actions by myself. I will, however, do all that I can to look into this again. If you have not already done so, you may wish to read the letter. It can be found at cftc.gov.
Bart Chilton, Commissioner
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre 1155 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20581
Telephone: (202) 418-5060
Fax: (202) 418-5620
cftc.gov
From: Harvey Organ [mailto:harveyorgan@rogers.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 8:42 AM
To: Chilton, Bart
Cc: don jack; don jack
Subject: gold and silver manipulation
Dear Mr Chilton;
I write to you today in anger that the CFTC has decided to ignore again the criminal manipulation in both silver and gold. I urge you to read Mr Ted Butler`s commentary released Friday night. I understand that he is in communication with you on a regular basis and that he has informed you of his findings.
I would like to point out that in silver (data from the participation report of banks) a total increase of 138 million oz of silver were sold short by only two unnamed banks. The data is from July 1 through to August 15.08. Other commercial banks remain on the short end but did not participate in any new purchases or sales of futures during this period.
The price of silver dropped from 19.55 to 12.22 at its low point. I strongly believe that there is a connection between the collusive action of these two banks and the fall in price of silver.
Throughout the past few months, silver was becoming scarce. Prices at EBay for silver averaged 2 dollars per oz higher than spot. When the price of silver collapsed, the mint has delayed shipments and totally stopped the production of gold coins. There is no plausible explanation for there being a shortage of metal and the price declines sharply. It defies economic logic. My broker has no explanation for this
As for gold, 3 banks increased their shorts by 7.8 million oz. Same logic as above.
The silver short of 138 million oz represents approximately 20% of worldly production which is around 500 million oz. The total quantity of silver metal represents an inventory greater than the total inventory at the comex.
In gold, world production is 72 million oz and the increase short is equivalent to 11% of world production. The 7.8 million oz is greater than the entire supply at the comex.
For silver, I gather that the two unnamed banks colluded to lease the silver inventory at the SLV. There is no other inventory large enough to lease. They would have leased that silver from the operator of the SLV fund. The leasee banks for some apparent reason, were paid a leesing fee of 3.5% per annum to carry out this horrific deed. The inventory belongs to owners of silver who invest in the SLV because they believe in the investment of silver. The owners would be shocked to see that the operators are going contra to their investment. My question to you is this:
Did you do a thorough analysis that the short position had REAL SILVER behind it..not leased silver that does not belong to the banks or operators of the silver fund.
Can you explain to me how the world benefited from this collusive and fraudulent transaction. How can two banks collude and decide together that they must short 20% of world production. What happens if they fail. Will taxpayers have to bail them out just like Fannie and Freddie are going to be bailed out with taxpayers money.
Right now, the short position by the banks are at record levels and yet the price of silver is very low. To me, it looks like we are heading into a total silver and gold default at the comex. I can just see foreign entities who see first hand the shortage of physical metal will bid for and take delivery of all remaining physical stocks at the comex. They can see this clearly, I am surprised that you do not see the problem.
The regulators must protect investors as that is your job. Your job is not to protect the banks. Your job is to protect the integrity of markets, free of manipulation, collusion and outright fraud.
I urge you to investigate this collusive fraud on the investing publc and report back immediately. I can see class action lawsuits developing rapidly.
Sincerely,
Harvey B Organ
298 Russell Hill Rd
Toronto Ontario
M4v2t6
416 928 0898